* how to have real (existing) submodules?
@ 2010-12-08 20:58 Oliver Kullmann
2010-12-08 22:25 ` Seth Robertson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Kullmann @ 2010-12-08 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Hi,
I have the following organisational problem:
Due to access restrictions, privacy, communication problems etc.
I need to have independent git repositories for various projects
(for example working on a scientific paper --- tossing the repos
as tarballs around is really great, and it works also for those
who do not want to use git). There repositories exist all at various
locations, often just local repositories, without internet access
(though some are on Github).
This creates obviously the problem of carrying them around (especially
given that certain places don't have Internet connection, and data
needs to be transferred via memory sticks).
I thought that "git submodule" would solve the problem, but now
I realised that these submodules are not "real", but they only contain
a bit of meta-data (this should really be said directly in the documentation).
So my hope, that I can have one super-repo, where I say, e.g., "git submodule foreach pull",
get the full super-repo, copy it on a memory stick, and then by pulling from
that copy I get everything into another super-repo, from which I distribute the
sub-repos, seems not so easily realisable with git?
A major restriction of git seems that the url's of each sub-repo need to
be unique, since they are in the global file .gitmodules? This seems strange
to me: If every submodule had its repo-specific pull-information, then still
by foreach-git-pull, where each pull has location-specific information, I
could achieve something.
Hm, is the way how this is supposed to work really to first do "git submodule init",
to get a false path to the sub-repo into config, and then to change that path?
Then I have that nonsensic information about the url in .gitmodules?
And I can't just push the whole thing to Github (as I would have hoped)?
There is also the old problem that config is not under version control.
So "submodule" would be just about substituting scripts which run through
a bunch of repos and call, e.g., git pull in each (but with a certain commit in mind)?
Anyway, if that's how it is, please just tell me.
(And perhaps the use-case is somehow convincing to a developer, and
somebody might think about adding "full" submodules.)
Thanks in any case!
Oliver
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: how to have real (existing) submodules?
2010-12-08 20:58 how to have real (existing) submodules? Oliver Kullmann
@ 2010-12-08 22:25 ` Seth Robertson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Seth Robertson @ 2010-12-08 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver Kullmann; +Cc: git
In message <20101208205846.GW29789@cs-wsok.swansea.ac.uk>, Oliver Kullmann writ
es:
I thought that "git submodule" would solve the problem, but now I
realised that these submodules are not "real", but they only
contain a bit of meta-data (this should really be said directly in
the documentation).
So my hope, that I can have one super-repo, where I say, e.g.,
"git submodule foreach pull", get the full super-repo, copy it on
a memory stick, and then by pulling from that copy I get
everything into another super-repo, from which I distribute the
sub-repos, seems not so easily realisable with git?
gitslave may work for you better than git-submodules in this specific
use case. http://gitslave.sf.net
In your example, you would create an organizational super-project git
module which is primarily a container for the .gitslave file which
tells the system how to access the various git repos and their on-disk
path names.
Given your diverse repo locations, it sounds like you will not be
using the feature which allows the pathnames of the slave repos to be
relative based on the URL to the super-repo (though you could have a
mixture of relative and absolute URLs if that would help your
functionality).
You would then run `gits pull` to issue a `git pull` against every
slave repo, and likewise `gits push` or `gits push home` or whatever.
(remotes would best work if your gitslave system has relative URLs).
While the super-project cannot be bare, the slave-repos could be bare
if that would help your data transfer functionality.
If certain slave repos would not be accessible in all locations, there
are options to bypass the errors you will get attempting to contact
the unreachable repos.
If you have any questions, please let me know (here, private email, or
on #git).
-Seth Robertson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-08 22:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-12-08 20:58 how to have real (existing) submodules? Oliver Kullmann
2010-12-08 22:25 ` Seth Robertson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox