[PATCH 0/1] banned.h: fix vsprintf warning

[PATCH 0/1] banned.h: fix vsprintf warning

[Andrey Portnoy via GitGitGadget]

Previously sprintf was the argument to the BANNED macro, where vsprintf is
expected.

Andrey Portnoy (1):
  banned.h: fix vsprintf warning

 banned.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)


base-commit: 75b2f01a0f642b39b0f29b6218515df9b5eb798e
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-322%2Fandportnoy%2Ffix-vsprintf-warning-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-322/andportnoy/fix-vsprintf-warning-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/322
-- 
gitgitgadget

[PATCH 1/1] banned.h: fix vsprintf warning

[Andrey Portnoy via GitGitGadget]

From: Andrey Portnoy <aportnoy@ucsd.edu>

Previously sprintf was the argument to the BANNED macro, where vsprintf
is expected.

Signed-off-by: Andrey Portnoy <aportnoy@ucsd.edu>
---
 banned.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/banned.h b/banned.h
index 447af24807..60a18d4403 100644
--- a/banned.h
+++ b/banned.h
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 #define vsprintf(...) BANNED(vsprintf)
 #else
 #define sprintf(buf,fmt,arg) BANNED(sprintf)
-#define vsprintf(buf,fmt,arg) BANNED(sprintf)
+#define vsprintf(buf,fmt,arg) BANNED(vsprintf)
 #endif
 
 #endif /* BANNED_H */
-- 
gitgitgadget

Re: [PATCH 0/1] banned.h: fix vsprintf warning

[Junio C Hamano]

"Andrey Portnoy via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:

> Previously sprintf was the argument to the BANNED macro, where vsprintf is
> expected.

Good eyes.  Thanks.


>
> Andrey Portnoy (1):
>   banned.h: fix vsprintf warning
>
>  banned.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 75b2f01a0f642b39b0f29b6218515df9b5eb798e
> Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-322%2Fandportnoy%2Ffix-vsprintf-warning-v1
> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-322/andportnoy/fix-vsprintf-warning-v1
> Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/322

Re: [PATCH 0/1] banned.h: fix vsprintf warning

[Jeff King]

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 09:24:10AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> "Andrey Portnoy via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > Previously sprintf was the argument to the BANNED macro, where vsprintf is
> > expected.
> 
> Good eyes.  Thanks.

There's an identical patch in:

  https://public-inbox.org/git/cab687db8315dd4245e1703402a8c76218ee1115.1566762128.git.me@ttaylorr.com/

and both were inspired by:

  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20793298

whose author has little info there, but I think is separate from either
submitter.

I don't know if we want to try to spread credit around via trailers.
"Racily-implemented-by:" ? :)

Anyway, the original bug is mine and the patch is obviously correct.

-Peff

Re: [PATCH 0/1] banned.h: fix vsprintf warning

[Taylor Blau]

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 02:33:17PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 09:24:10AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > "Andrey Portnoy via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > > Previously sprintf was the argument to the BANNED macro, where vsprintf is
> > > expected.
> >
> > Good eyes.  Thanks.
>
> There's an identical patch in:
>
>   https://public-inbox.org/git/cab687db8315dd4245e1703402a8c76218ee1115.1566762128.git.me@ttaylorr.com/

Thanks for mentioning. I did send mine in around a day ago now, but it
came in on a Sunday, so it makes sense that Andrey's message may have
appeared earlier in mailboxes when looking today.

I don't really mind about the credit, nor do I think there's much value
in crediting you or me with 'Racily-implemented-by'. My patch has a few
more details such as blame information (and how the typo was only made
in the explicit version, not the variadic form), so it may be worthwhile
to take that instead of this, but I don't mind either way.

> and both were inspired by:
>
>   https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20793298

Indeed. It was a little surprising to see 'banned.h' at the top of
Hacker News when I checked it this weekend :-).

> whose author has little info there, but I think is separate from either
> submitter.
>
> I don't know if we want to try to spread credit around via trailers.
> "Racily-implemented-by:" ? :)
>
> Anyway, the original bug is mine and the patch is obviously correct.
>
> -Peff

Yep.

Thanks,
Taylor

Re: [PATCH 0/1] banned.h: fix vsprintf warning

[Junio C Hamano]

Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> writes:

> ... My patch has a few
> more details such as blame information (and how the typo was only made
> in the explicit version, not the variadic form), so it may be worthwhile
> to take that instead of this, but I don't mind either way.

Yup, that was exactly why I took that version (after tentatively
queuing the other one, but discarded before pushing the integration
result out).

Thanks, all.

>> I don't know if we want to try to spread credit around via trailers.
>> "Racily-implemented-by:" ? :)

Please don't X-<.

Re: [PATCH 0/1] banned.h: fix vsprintf warning

[Andrey Portnoy]

> On Aug 26, 2019, at 11:33 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 09:24:10AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
>> "Andrey Portnoy via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>>> Previously sprintf was the argument to the BANNED macro, where vsprintf is
>>> expected.
>> 
>> Good eyes.  Thanks.
> 
> There's an identical patch in:
> 
>  https://public-inbox.org/git/cab687db8315dd4245e1703402a8c76218ee1115.1566762128.git.me@ttaylorr.com/
> 
> and both were inspired by:
> 
>  https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20793298
Nope, mine was not “inspired by” that comment, noticed the bug myself. I did look at this header because it was posted on HN, though.
> 
> whose author has little info there, but I think is separate from either
> submitter.
> 
> I don't know if we want to try to spread credit around via trailers.
> "Racily-implemented-by:" ? :)
> 
> Anyway, the original bug is mine and the patch is obviously correct.
> 
> -Peff
> 

Re: [PATCH 0/1] banned.h: fix vsprintf warning

[Andrey Portnoy]

> On Aug 26, 2019, at 11:33 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 09:24:10AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
>> "Andrey Portnoy via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>>> Previously sprintf was the argument to the BANNED macro, where vsprintf is
>>> expected.
>> 
>> Good eyes.  Thanks.
> 
> There's an identical patch in:
> 
> https://public-inbox.org/git/cab687db8315dd4245e1703402a8c76218ee1115.1566762128.git.me@ttaylorr.com/
> 
> and both were inspired by:
> 
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20793298
Nope, mine was not “inspired by” that comment, noticed the bug myself. I did look at this header because it was posted on HN, though.
> 
> whose author has little info there, but I think is separate from either
> submitter.
> 
> I don't know if we want to try to spread credit around via trailers.
> "Racily-implemented-by:" ? :)
> 
> Anyway, the original bug is mine and the patch is obviously correct.
> 
> -Peff
>