From: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>, Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>,
Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>,
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/10] promisor-remote: pass config entry to all_fields_match() directly
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 13:52:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260407115243.358642-3-christian.couder@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260407115243.358642-1-christian.couder@gmail.com>
The `in_list == 0` path of all_fields_match() looks up the remote in
`config_info` by `advertised->name` repeatedly, even though every
caller in should_accept_remote() has already performed this
lookup and holds the result in `p`.
To avoid this useless work, let's replace the `int in_list`
parameter with a `struct promisor_info *config_entry` pointer:
- When NULL (ACCEPT_ALL mode): scan the whole `config_info` list, as
the old `in_list == 1` path did.
- When non-NULL: match against that single config entry directly,
avoiding the redundant string_list_lookup() call.
This removes the hidden dependency on `advertised->name` inside
all_fields_match(), which would be wrong if in the future
auto-configured remotes are implemented, as the local config name may
differ from the server's advertised name.
While at it, let's also add a comment before all_fields_match() and
match_field_against_config() to help understand how things work and
help avoid similar issues.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
---
promisor-remote.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/promisor-remote.c b/promisor-remote.c
index 7ce7d22f95..6c935f855a 100644
--- a/promisor-remote.c
+++ b/promisor-remote.c
@@ -575,6 +575,12 @@ enum accept_promisor {
ACCEPT_ALL
};
+/*
+ * Check if a specific field and its advertised value match the local
+ * configuration of a given promisor remote.
+ *
+ * Returns 1 if they match, 0 otherwise.
+ */
static int match_field_against_config(const char *field, const char *value,
struct promisor_info *config_info)
{
@@ -586,9 +592,18 @@ static int match_field_against_config(const char *field, const char *value,
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * Check that the advertised fields match the local configuration.
+ *
+ * When 'config_entry' is NULL (ACCEPT_ALL mode), every checked field
+ * must match at least one remote in 'config_info'.
+ *
+ * When 'config_entry' points to a specific remote's config, the
+ * checked fields are compared against that single remote only.
+ */
static int all_fields_match(struct promisor_info *advertised,
struct string_list *config_info,
- int in_list)
+ struct promisor_info *config_entry)
{
struct string_list *fields = fields_checked();
struct string_list_item *item_checked;
@@ -597,7 +612,6 @@ static int all_fields_match(struct promisor_info *advertised,
int match = 0;
const char *field = item_checked->string;
const char *value = NULL;
- struct string_list_item *item;
if (!strcasecmp(field, promisor_field_filter))
value = advertised->filter;
@@ -607,7 +621,11 @@ static int all_fields_match(struct promisor_info *advertised,
if (!value)
return 0;
- if (in_list) {
+ if (config_entry) {
+ match = match_field_against_config(field, value,
+ config_entry);
+ } else {
+ struct string_list_item *item;
for_each_string_list_item(item, config_info) {
struct promisor_info *p = item->util;
if (match_field_against_config(field, value, p)) {
@@ -615,12 +633,6 @@ static int all_fields_match(struct promisor_info *advertised,
break;
}
}
- } else {
- item = string_list_lookup(config_info, advertised->name);
- if (item) {
- struct promisor_info *p = item->util;
- match = match_field_against_config(field, value, p);
- }
}
if (!match)
@@ -640,7 +652,7 @@ static int should_accept_remote(enum accept_promisor accept,
const char *remote_url = advertised->url;
if (accept == ACCEPT_ALL)
- return all_fields_match(advertised, config_info, 1);
+ return all_fields_match(advertised, config_info, NULL);
/* Get config info for that promisor remote */
item = string_list_lookup(config_info, remote_name);
@@ -652,7 +664,7 @@ static int should_accept_remote(enum accept_promisor accept,
p = item->util;
if (accept == ACCEPT_KNOWN_NAME)
- return all_fields_match(advertised, config_info, 0);
+ return all_fields_match(advertised, config_info, p);
if (accept != ACCEPT_KNOWN_URL)
BUG("Unhandled 'enum accept_promisor' value '%d'", accept);
@@ -663,7 +675,7 @@ static int should_accept_remote(enum accept_promisor accept,
}
if (!strcmp(p->url, remote_url))
- return all_fields_match(advertised, config_info, 0);
+ return all_fields_match(advertised, config_info, p);
warning(_("known remote named '%s' but with URL '%s' instead of '%s'"),
remote_name, p->url, remote_url);
--
2.54.0.rc0.114.g05d466edb8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-07 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-02 7:06 [PATCH 00/10] Prepare for advertised remotes auto-configure via URL allowlist Christian Couder
2026-04-02 7:06 ` [PATCH 01/10] promisor-remote: try accepted remotes before others in get_direct() Christian Couder
2026-04-02 7:46 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-04-07 12:05 ` Christian Couder
2026-04-07 14:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-04-02 7:06 ` [PATCH 02/10] promisor-remote: pass config entry to all_fields_match() directly Christian Couder
2026-04-02 7:06 ` [PATCH 03/10] promisor-remote: clarify that a remote is ignored Christian Couder
2026-04-02 7:06 ` [PATCH 04/10] promisor-remote: reject empty name or URL in advertised remote Christian Couder
2026-04-02 7:46 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-04-02 7:06 ` [PATCH 05/10] promisor-remote: refactor should_accept_remote() control flow Christian Couder
2026-04-02 7:06 ` [PATCH 06/10] promisor-remote: refactor has_control_char() Christian Couder
2026-04-02 7:06 ` [PATCH 07/10] promisor-remote: refactor accept_from_server() Christian Couder
2026-04-02 7:06 ` [PATCH 08/10] promisor-remote: keep accepted promisor_info structs alive Christian Couder
2026-04-02 7:06 ` [PATCH 09/10] promisor-remote: remove the 'accepted' strvec Christian Couder
2026-04-02 7:06 ` [PATCH 10/10] t5710: use proper file:// URIs for absolute paths Christian Couder
2026-04-02 9:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-04-03 8:16 ` Christian Couder
2026-04-07 12:02 ` Christian Couder
2026-04-02 7:47 ` [PATCH 00/10] Prepare for advertised remotes auto-configure via URL allowlist Patrick Steinhardt
2026-04-02 18:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-04-07 11:57 ` Christian Couder
2026-04-07 11:52 ` [PATCH v2 " Christian Couder
2026-04-07 11:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] promisor-remote: try accepted remotes before others in get_direct() Christian Couder
2026-04-07 11:52 ` Christian Couder [this message]
2026-04-07 16:56 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] promisor-remote: pass config entry to all_fields_match() directly Junio C Hamano
2026-04-07 11:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] promisor-remote: clarify that a remote is ignored Christian Couder
2026-04-07 17:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-04-07 11:52 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] promisor-remote: reject empty name or URL in advertised remote Christian Couder
2026-04-07 17:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-04-07 11:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] promisor-remote: refactor should_accept_remote() control flow Christian Couder
2026-04-07 11:52 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] promisor-remote: refactor has_control_char() Christian Couder
2026-04-07 11:52 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] promisor-remote: refactor accept_from_server() Christian Couder
2026-04-07 11:52 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] promisor-remote: keep accepted promisor_info structs alive Christian Couder
2026-04-07 11:52 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] promisor-remote: remove the 'accepted' strvec Christian Couder
2026-04-07 11:52 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] t5710: use proper file:// URIs for absolute paths Christian Couder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260407115243.358642-3-christian.couder@gmail.com \
--to=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox