From: Jasper Mayone <me@jaspermayone.com>
To: haraldnordgren@gmail.com
Cc: gitster@pobox.com, git@vger.kernel.org, ben.knoble@gmail.com,
kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com, phillip.wood123@gmail.com,
Jasper Mayone <me@jaspermayone.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] branch: let --delete-merged find squash merged branches
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 13:35:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261021173503.70887-1-me@jaspermayone.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.2425.v3.git.git.1792585717.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
"Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
> * By default a branch counts as merged when an upstream commit has its
> exact version of every file it changed. This never reads file contents,
> so it stays cheap in a partial clone. It finds rebase merges, and squash
> merges where upstream left those files alone.
> * Replace --no-squashed with an opt-in --squashed, which also finds
> branches merged after upstream changed the same files by merging those
> files.
Thanks for the new round. I ran v3 (2befb182dc) on the same generated
repositories as v2, and added one case for a squash that landed after
upstream changed another line of the same file. t3200 passes, and the
build is clean with DEVELOPER=1.
The results match the cover letter. Without --squashed, v3 deletes the
squash merges, the GitHub-style squash, the rebase merge, the rename,
and the squash that was later reverted. It keeps the new case.
--squashed also deletes the new case, and "landed as" names the correct
commit each time. A branch whose work only partly landed is kept, with
or without --squashed.
But the false positive from my v2 report is still there. A branch that
was never merged is deleted because another author made the same change
in an unrelated commit. In v2 I could turn that off with --no-squashed.
In v3 the cheap check finds it, so it happens with no option at all.
That is the case Junio called "irrelevant", and he suggested that
"--delete-merged" stay the strict "my commits are in upstream" check.
The file contents of such a branch are in upstream, but its own commits
and messages are not, and the user did not ask for the looser meaning.
So I would still prefer the whole looser check behind one opt-in, with
a config variable for the default. The cheap check and --squashed could
then be two levels of that one option, for example:
git branch --delete-merged origin/main --landed=files
git branch --delete-merged origin/main --landed=merge
Users who land everything through "Squash and merge" set it once in the
config, and plain --delete-merged keeps its current meaning.
A branch checked out in a worktree is still skipped with no message,
while a branch with deleteMerged=false prints "Skipping". I sent an RFC
for "git worktree list --merged" about that case:
https://lore.kernel.org/git/20261021173350.67854-1-me@jaspermayone.com/
Thanks,
Jasper
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-21 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 7:30 [PATCH] branch: let --delete-merged find squash merged branches Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-09-29 7:46 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-09-29 7:52 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-09-29 8:08 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-09-29 11:18 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 13:31 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-09-29 11:26 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 13:44 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-09-29 13:52 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-09-29 15:28 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-29 18:34 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-04 9:54 ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-04 22:28 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-08 15:25 ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-08 18:42 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-09 8:16 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-10-09 11:11 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-09 11:18 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-09 13:40 ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-09 13:37 ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-09 15:27 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-08 17:51 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-10-09 13:34 ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-11 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-11 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-11 9:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] branch: add --no-squashed to skip the squash search Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-12 0:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] branch: let --delete-merged find squash merged branches Junio C Hamano
2026-10-12 9:50 ` Phillip Wood
2026-10-12 14:31 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-12 16:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-12 17:44 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-13 2:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-17 22:23 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-19 4:40 ` Jasper Mayone
2026-10-18 15:09 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-12 12:41 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-12 15:49 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-10-21 12:28 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] " Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-21 12:28 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] branch: move the deleteMerged opt-out check into a helper Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-21 12:28 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] branch: let --delete-merged find rebase merged branches Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-21 12:28 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] branch: add --squashed to find squash " Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-21 17:35 ` Jasper Mayone [this message]
2026-10-21 18:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] branch: let --delete-merged " Harald Nordgren
2026-10-22 12:55 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-10-22 14:41 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-22 5:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-22 7:18 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-22 16:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-22 16:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-22 17:31 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-22 17:44 ` Jasper Mayone
2026-10-22 17:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-23 9:07 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-22 17:44 ` Harald Nordgren
2026-10-22 12:59 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-10-26 8:33 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] " Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-26 8:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] branch: move the deleteMerged opt-out check into a helper Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-26 8:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] branch: let delete_branches() name where a branch landed Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-26 8:33 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] branch: add --delete-integrated to delete rebase and squash merged branches Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
2026-10-26 8:33 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] branch: let --delete-integrated find branches merged onto changed files Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261021173503.70887-1-me@jaspermayone.com \
--to=me@jaspermayone.com \
--cc=ben.knoble@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=haraldnordgren@gmail.com \
--cc=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox