Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tanay Abhra <tanayabh@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>,
	Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] config.c: change the function signature of `git_config_string()`
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 17:11:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53CE4DCE.1010908@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140722110720.GA386@peff.net>



On 7/22/2014 4:37 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 03:49:56AM -0700, Tanay Abhra wrote:
> 
>> `git_config_string()` output parameter `dest` is declared as a const
>> which is unnecessary as the caller of the function is given a strduped
>> string which can be modified without causing any harm.
>>
>> Thus, remove the const from the function signature.
> 
> You are correct that it is unnecessary. However, this patch alone is not
> sufficient because of the way const-ness in C works. If I have:
> 
>   static const char *some_global;
> 
> then with your patch, calling:
> 
>   git_config_string(&some_global, var, value);
> 
> will complain that we are passing a pointer to "const char *", not a
> pointer to "char *". And indeed, compiling with your patch introduces a
> ton of compiler warnings.
>

I had also thought that the compiler would raise lot of warnings but it didn't
on the first compile.
Now I checked again and now it complains a lot, maybe it because I was tinkering
with my config.mak, dunno.

> We would have to convert each of the variables we pass to it to:
> 
>   static char *some_global;
> 
> That's not so bad, but:
> 
>   static char *some_global = "some_default_value";
> 
> is wrong. Such a global sometimes points to const storage (i.e.,
> initially), and sometimes to allocated storage (if it was loaded from
> config). We simply keep the latter as a const pointer (since we would
> not bother to free it at the end of the program anyway), and that
> decision influences git_config_string, which is just a helper for
> setting such variables anyway.
> 
> So I would not mind lifting this unnecessary restriction on
> git_config_string, but I do not see a way to do it without making the
> rest of the code much uglier (and I do not see a particular advantage in
> modifying git_config_string here that would make it worth the trouble).
> 

Yes, you are right. This patch is the conclusion of discussion in [1].
I used the same function signature as git_config_string for
git_config_get_string() which lead to some ugly casts like

+git_config_get_string("imap.folder", (const char**)&imap_folder);

in imap-send.c patch and others. What should we do about such cases, I used
either an intermediate variable or casts but Junio commented that it would be better
if the dest parameter was a non-const and that it was a weakness of the config-set
API that demanded the dest to be a const pointer.

[1]: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/253948/

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-22 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-22 10:49 [PATCH] config.c: change the function signature of `git_config_string()` Tanay Abhra
2014-07-22 11:07 ` Jeff King
2014-07-22 11:41   ` Tanay Abhra [this message]
2014-07-22 11:44   ` Matthieu Moy
2014-07-22 11:48     ` Tanay Abhra
2014-07-22 15:53     ` Junio C Hamano
2014-07-22 16:03       ` Matthieu Moy
2014-07-22 16:47   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-07-23  8:42     ` Matthieu Moy
2014-07-23 17:25       ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53CE4DCE.1010908@gmail.com \
    --to=tanayabh@gmail.com \
    --cc=Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
    --cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox