Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
Cc: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>,
	Marc Fournier <marc.fournier@camptocamp.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git-subtree: directory mismatch
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:31:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v7htexuxc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32541b130911251028h6db240d5yd171fa4941ef14ba@mail.gmail.com> (Avery Pennarun's message of "Wed\, 25 Nov 2009 13\:28\:52 -0500")

Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> writes:

>> Probably you can save time by using what was already done
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/76650/focus=89021
>
> Hi Nanako,
>
> I've read through the thread (I do remember skimming it awhile ago)
> but can't find patches for the syntax actually under discussion.

I very much prefer gmane threading when following discussion over all the
other mail archives, but this shows one thing I really dislike about it.

It is not easy to find a near-by thread when looking at an old article,
and you have to be willing to bisect the page number at the right hand
side of the web UI.  Often a patch series is posted as a separate thread
after a discussion reaches conclusion or identifies an issue to solve, and
the real patch series lives in a near-by thread.  Very inconvenient.

I don't know how Nana digs up older discussion; maybe she knows better
ways.

In my primary repository, I have an archive of mothballed branches kept
with this alias:

    [alias]
    hold = "!sh -c 'git update-ref refs/hold/$1 refs/heads/$1 && git branch -D $1' -"

and found this series in there.  It applies to v1.6.0-rc0~245 (no, I won't
be rebasing this myself---I don't have time for that while preparing for
the pre-release feature freeze).

    f7713ce Document that merge strategies can now take their own options
    7eda236 Make "subtree" part more orthogonal to the rest of merge-recursive.
    e416d61 Teach git-pull to pass -X<option> to git-merge
    09f7d22 Teach git-merge to pass -X<option> to the backend strategy module
    904288c git-merge-recursive-{ours,theirs}
    e0aafb4 git-merge-file --ours, --theirs
    -d3e977b Merge branch 'maint'

Look at http://github.com/gitster/git/commits/jc/merge-theirs/

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-25 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-24 19:53 git-subtree: directory mismatch Marc Fournier
2009-11-24 21:48 ` Avery Pennarun
2009-11-24 23:08   ` Nanako Shiraishi
2009-11-25 18:28     ` Avery Pennarun
2009-11-25 19:31       ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2009-11-25 19:48         ` Avery Pennarun
2009-11-25 20:20           ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 23:17             ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-25 23:20               ` Avery Pennarun
2009-11-25 23:41                 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-11-25 23:45                   ` Avery Pennarun
2009-11-25 14:32   ` Marc Fournier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7v7htexuxc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=apenwarr@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.fournier@camptocamp.com \
    --cc=nanako3@lavabit.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox