From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
Cc: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com>,
Marc Fournier <marc.fournier@camptocamp.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git-subtree: directory mismatch
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:31:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v7htexuxc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32541b130911251028h6db240d5yd171fa4941ef14ba@mail.gmail.com> (Avery Pennarun's message of "Wed\, 25 Nov 2009 13\:28\:52 -0500")
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> writes:
>> Probably you can save time by using what was already done
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/76650/focus=89021
>
> Hi Nanako,
>
> I've read through the thread (I do remember skimming it awhile ago)
> but can't find patches for the syntax actually under discussion.
I very much prefer gmane threading when following discussion over all the
other mail archives, but this shows one thing I really dislike about it.
It is not easy to find a near-by thread when looking at an old article,
and you have to be willing to bisect the page number at the right hand
side of the web UI. Often a patch series is posted as a separate thread
after a discussion reaches conclusion or identifies an issue to solve, and
the real patch series lives in a near-by thread. Very inconvenient.
I don't know how Nana digs up older discussion; maybe she knows better
ways.
In my primary repository, I have an archive of mothballed branches kept
with this alias:
[alias]
hold = "!sh -c 'git update-ref refs/hold/$1 refs/heads/$1 && git branch -D $1' -"
and found this series in there. It applies to v1.6.0-rc0~245 (no, I won't
be rebasing this myself---I don't have time for that while preparing for
the pre-release feature freeze).
f7713ce Document that merge strategies can now take their own options
7eda236 Make "subtree" part more orthogonal to the rest of merge-recursive.
e416d61 Teach git-pull to pass -X<option> to git-merge
09f7d22 Teach git-merge to pass -X<option> to the backend strategy module
904288c git-merge-recursive-{ours,theirs}
e0aafb4 git-merge-file --ours, --theirs
-d3e977b Merge branch 'maint'
Look at http://github.com/gitster/git/commits/jc/merge-theirs/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-25 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-24 19:53 git-subtree: directory mismatch Marc Fournier
2009-11-24 21:48 ` Avery Pennarun
2009-11-24 23:08 ` Nanako Shiraishi
2009-11-25 18:28 ` Avery Pennarun
2009-11-25 19:31 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2009-11-25 19:48 ` Avery Pennarun
2009-11-25 20:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-11-25 23:17 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-11-25 23:20 ` Avery Pennarun
2009-11-25 23:41 ` Björn Steinbrink
2009-11-25 23:45 ` Avery Pennarun
2009-11-25 14:32 ` Marc Fournier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7v7htexuxc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=apenwarr@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.fournier@camptocamp.com \
--cc=nanako3@lavabit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox