Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add receive.denyNonFastforwards config variable
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 22:08:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v8xkderhv.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0609210211570.19042@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de> (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Thu, 21 Sep 2006 02:17:22 +0200 (CEST)")

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>> 
>> > 	No longer barfs on new refs, and tries all merge bases (even if I
>> > 	cannot come up with any scenario where there is more than one merge
>> > 	base in the case of a fast forward).
>> 
>> Hmm.  If that is the case (and I think it is although I haven't
>> come up with a proof),
>
> From git-fetch.sh:
>
>             # Require fast-forward.
>             mb=$(git-merge-base "$local" "$2") &&
>...
> So we indeed assumed that git-merge-base returns the old commit in the 
> case of a fast-forward (git-merge-base returns just the first item of the 
> result of get_merge_bases()).

I think this was leftover from the days we naïvely assumed that
multiple bases does not matter, and probably needs updating.

> Note that I have no proof that this assumption is true. It might be wrong 
> in this case:
>
>     X - a - b - c - Y
>   /           /
> o - d - e - f
>
> where X is the old commit, and Y is the new commit. But I am too tired to 
> test it right now.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-21  5:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-20 22:28 [PATCH] add receive.denyNonFastforwards config variable Johannes Schindelin
2006-09-20 22:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-20 22:46   ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-20 23:07   ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-09-20 23:19     ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-21  0:10       ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-09-21  6:26         ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-21  9:10           ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-09-20 23:38     ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-21  0:17       ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-09-21  5:08         ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2006-09-21  5:52         ` Jeff King
2006-09-21  6:43           ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-21  9:08             ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-09-21  9:25               ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-20 23:45     ` Jeff King
2006-09-21  0:07       ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-09-21  5:35         ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7v8xkderhv.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
    --to=junkio@cox.net \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox