From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Allow transfer of any valid sha1
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 14:04:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7virntsto6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1y7wpde1w.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Thu, 25 May 2006 14:50:35 -0600")
ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
> - I don't know which branch I need to fetch.
As you say yourself Andrew marks which one he fetched from, so
this is a non-issue.
> - Fetching a branch that I just want a subset of is wasteful.
Generally this is true, but in practice and especially for this
particular application I do not think so. After all Andrew
pulled from the tip and got that tip, and IIUYC you are trying
to follow what Andrew did, so you'd be better doing this soon
after Andrew annouces the series, so your subset would be a
close to 100% subset. Otherwise you would have different
problem anyway -- the tree owner after seeing -mm tree has his
series may rewind and rebuild the branch in preparation of
feeding him with the next time around.
> - It feels really weird when everything else allows me to use sha1s
> for git-fetch to deny them.
That is a real argument and I am not opposed to change
fetch-pack to ask for an arbitrary SHA1 the caller obtained out
of band.
> Then there is the big hole in my plan to get better changelog information
> that it appears that after Andrew pulls a branch he resolves some
> merge conflicts. If that is right I need to figure out how to address
> that before I can improve git-quiltimport.sh.
The last time I talked with Andrew, he is not doing a merge nor
resolving merge conflicts. He treats git primarily as a
patchbomb distribution mechanism, and works on (a rough
equivalent of) the output of format-patch from merge base
between his base tree and individual subsystem tree. After that
things are normal quilt workflow outside git, whatever it is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-25 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-24 7:51 [RFC][PATCH] Allow transfer of any valid sha1 Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-24 9:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-25 5:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-25 6:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-25 17:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-25 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-25 17:59 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-25 18:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-25 18:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-25 20:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-25 20:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-26 8:27 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-26 10:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-26 17:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-25 20:50 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-25 21:04 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2006-05-26 8:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-08 9:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7virntsto6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
--to=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox