Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Allow transfer of any valid sha1
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 02:32:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m14pzdchje.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7virntsto6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Thu, 25 May 2006 14:04:09 -0700")

Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> writes:

> ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:

>> - It feels really weird when everything else allows me to use sha1s
>>   for git-fetch to deny them.
>
> That is a real argument and I am not opposed to change
> fetch-pack to ask for an arbitrary SHA1 the caller obtained out
> of band.

Good this was the primary reason I kept pursuing the issue after
I figured out what it was.

>> Then there is the big hole in my plan to get better changelog information
>> that it appears that after Andrew pulls a branch he resolves some
>> merge conflicts.  If that is right I need to figure out how to address
>> that before I can improve git-quiltimport.sh.
>
> The last time I talked with Andrew, he is not doing a merge nor
> resolving merge conflicts.  He treats git primarily as a
> patchbomb distribution mechanism, and works on (a rough
> equivalent of) the output of format-patch from merge base
> between his base tree and individual subsystem tree.  After that
> things are normal quilt workflow outside git, whatever it is.

That sounds right.  I just know that there I had some strange
merge conflicts on the second git tree I pulled from.  Something
about a file being added twice.  It was one thing too many to
investigate this round.

Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-26  8:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-24  7:51 [RFC][PATCH] Allow transfer of any valid sha1 Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-24  9:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-25  5:09   ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-25  6:36     ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-25 17:00       ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-25 17:28         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-25 17:59           ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-25 18:28           ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-25 18:36             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-25 20:30               ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-25 20:53                 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-26  8:27                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-26 10:04                 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-26 17:32                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-25 20:50             ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-05-25 21:04               ` Junio C Hamano
2006-05-26  8:32                 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2006-06-08  9:33                 ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m14pzdchje.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=junkio@cox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox