From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t5540-http-push.sh: avoid non-portable grep -P
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:24:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vr61kpw0b.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4WGE1cq9SGp9DuzqT2ZuVN0RzLGmBe1mAX4n1O4-TNyRqiZqxDP62A@cipher.nrlssc.navy.mil> (Brandon Casey's message of "Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:12:26 -0600")
Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil> writes:
> Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Brandon Casey wrote:
>>
>>> sed -e 'script' input-file
>>>
>>> rather than
>>>
>>> sed -e 'script' < input-file
>>
>> What should make the former more preferable to the latter?
>
> It's less complex, but as you describe in the next paragraph, if the
> file name is not desired in the result then the latter is preferable.
> I initially viewed the latter form as a useless use of cat, equivalent
> to:
>
> cat input-file | sed -e 'script'
>
>> Especially given that the latter way is preferable with other commands (at
>> least as far as our test suite is concerned), such as grep, because you do
>> not get the file name as part of the result?
>>
>> And especially given that sed means _stream_ editor, not file editor?
>
> especially? Your first argument is valid, but this last sentence means nothing.
>
Ok, ok, I heard all of you. I think "sed -e 'script' file" is better
because it is one letter shorter than with "<" rediretion, nothing else.
I merely was shooting for rejecting an obvious crap, not aiming for
perfection.
Here is the final one. Let's stop wasting time and go on with our lives
;-)
Thanks.
-- >8 --
From: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:44:40 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] t5540-http-push.sh: avoid non-portable grep -P
OS X's GNU grep does not support -P/--perl-regexp.
We use a basic RE instead, and simplify the pattern slightly by
replacing '+' with '*' so it can be more easily expressed using a basic
RE. The important part of pattern, checking for a SHA-1 has suffix in
the successful PUT/MOVE operations, remains the same. Also, a-z instead
of a-f was an obvious mistake in the original RE. Here are samples of
what we want to match:
127.0.0.1 - - [26/Feb/2009:22:38:13 +0000] "PUT /test_repo.git/objects/3e/a4fbb9e18a401a6463c595d08118fcb9fb7426_fab55116904c665a95438bcc78521444a7db6096 HTTP/1.1" 201 277
127.0.0.1 - - [26/Feb/2009:22:38:13 +0000] "MOVE /test_repo.git/objects/3e/a4fbb9e18a401a6463c595d08118fcb9fb7426_fab55116904c665a95438bcc78521444a7db6096 HTTP/1.1" 201 277
Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
t/t5540-http-push.sh | 11 ++++++++---
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t5540-http-push.sh b/t/t5540-http-push.sh
index 11b3432..10e5fd0 100755
--- a/t/t5540-http-push.sh
+++ b/t/t5540-http-push.sh
@@ -94,10 +94,15 @@ test_expect_success 'MKCOL sends directory names with trailing slashes' '
'
-test_expect_success 'PUT and MOVE sends object to URLs with SHA-1 hash suffix' '
+x1="[0-9a-f]"
+x2="$x1$x1"
+x5="$x1$x1$x1$x1$x1"
+x38="$x5$x5$x5$x5$x5$x5$x5$x1$x1$x1"
+x40="$x38$x2"
- grep -P "\"(?:PUT|MOVE) .+objects/[\da-z]{2}/[\da-z]{38}_[\da-z\-]{40} HTTP/[0-9.]+\" 20\d" \
- < "$HTTPD_ROOT_PATH"/access.log
+test_expect_success 'PUT and MOVE sends object to URLs with SHA-1 hash suffix' '
+ sed -e "s/PUT /OP /" -e "s/MOVE /OP /" "$HTTPD_ROOT_PATH"/access.log |
+ grep -e "\"OP .*/objects/$x2/${x38}_$x40 HTTP/[.0-9]*\" 20[0-9] "
'
--
1.6.2.rc2.91.gf9a36
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-27 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-26 19:49 [PATCH] t5540-http-push.sh: avoid non-portable grep -P Jay Soffian
2009-02-26 20:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-26 20:43 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-26 20:46 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-26 21:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-26 22:19 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-26 22:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-02-26 22:40 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-26 22:45 ` [PATCH v3] " Jay Soffian
2009-02-26 23:29 ` [PATCH] " Junio C Hamano
2009-02-26 23:40 ` Jay Soffian
2009-02-26 23:44 ` [PATCH v4] " Jay Soffian
2009-02-26 23:51 ` [PATCH] " Brandon Casey
2009-02-26 23:58 ` Johannes Schindelin
2009-02-27 0:12 ` Brandon Casey
2009-02-27 0:24 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2009-02-26 21:41 ` [PATCH v2] " Jay Soffian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vr61kpw0b.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=casey@nrlssc.navy.mil \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jaysoffian@gmail.com \
--cc=rctay89@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox