* [PATCH] Return error when not checking out an entry due to dirtiness.
@ 2005-10-04 5:11 Junio C Hamano
2005-10-04 19:52 ` Horst von Brand
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2005-10-04 5:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Without -f flag, 'git-checkout-index foo.c' issued an error message
when foo.c already existed in the working tree and did not match index.
However it did not return an error from the underlying checkout_entry()
function and resulted in a successful exit(0).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
---
* I've made sure that the existing scripts do not use
checkout-index without -f in a way that could be affected by
this change. However, third-party scripts may be affected by
this. Cogito and StGIT should be OK -- they either run
checkout with -f, do not check the error return when it does
not use -f, or runs checkout without -f in an empty working
tree.
checkout-index.c | 11 ++++++++---
entry.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
5a166f6a9d1b7ca2de673139fbfc4112b1b2e308
diff --git a/checkout-index.c b/checkout-index.c
--- a/checkout-index.c
+++ b/checkout-index.c
@@ -63,15 +63,20 @@ static int checkout_file(const char *nam
static int checkout_all(void)
{
- int i;
+ int i, errs;
- for (i = 0; i < active_nr ; i++) {
+ for (errs = i = 0; i < active_nr ; i++) {
struct cache_entry *ce = active_cache[i];
if (ce_stage(ce))
continue;
if (checkout_entry(ce, &state) < 0)
- return -1;
+ errs++;
}
+ if (errs)
+ /* we have already done our error reporting.
+ * exit with the same code as die().
+ */
+ exit(128);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/entry.c b/entry.c
--- a/entry.c
+++ b/entry.c
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ int checkout_entry(struct cache_entry *c
if (!state->force) {
if (!state->quiet)
fprintf(stderr, "git-checkout-index: %s already exists\n", path);
- return 0;
+ return -1;
}
/*
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Return error when not checking out an entry due to dirtiness.
2005-10-04 5:11 [PATCH] Return error when not checking out an entry due to dirtiness Junio C Hamano
@ 2005-10-04 19:52 ` Horst von Brand
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Horst von Brand @ 2005-10-04 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: git
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
> Without -f flag, 'git-checkout-index foo.c' issued an error message
> when foo.c already existed in the working tree and did not match index.
> However it did not return an error from the underlying checkout_entry()
> function and resulted in a successful exit(0).
>
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
>
> ---
>
> * I've made sure that the existing scripts do not use
> checkout-index without -f in a way that could be affected by
> this change. However, third-party scripts may be affected by
> this. Cogito and StGIT should be OK -- they either run
> checkout with -f, do not check the error return when it does
> not use -f, or runs checkout without -f in an empty working
> tree.
>
> checkout-index.c | 11 ++++++++---
> entry.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> 5a166f6a9d1b7ca2de673139fbfc4112b1b2e308
> diff --git a/checkout-index.c b/checkout-index.c
> --- a/checkout-index.c
> +++ b/checkout-index.c
> @@ -63,15 +63,20 @@ static int checkout_file(const char *nam
>
> static int checkout_all(void)
> {
> - int i;
> + int i, errs;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < active_nr ; i++) {
> + for (errs = i = 0; i < active_nr ; i++) {
This is ugly. Why not just:
errs = 0;
for (i = 0; i < active_nr ; i++) {
(errs is in no way the variable controlled by the for).
--
Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-10-04 19:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-10-04 5:11 [PATCH] Return error when not checking out an entry due to dirtiness Junio C Hamano
2005-10-04 19:52 ` Horst von Brand
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox