* [PATCH] fix "git apply --index ..." not to deref NULL
@ 2011-10-12 8:18 Jim Meyering
2011-10-12 14:27 ` Jeff King
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jim Meyering @ 2011-10-12 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
I noticed this when "git am CORRUPTED" unexpectedly failed with an
odd diagnostic, and even removed one of the files it was supposed
to have patched.
Reproduce with any valid old/new patch from which you have removed
the "+++ b/FILE" line. You'll see a diagnostic like this
fatal: unable to write file '(null)' mode 100644: Bad address
and you'll find that FILE has been removed.
The above is on glibc-based systems. On other systems, rather than
getting "null" in parentheses, you'll probably provoke a segfault,
as git tries to dereference the NULL file name.
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com>
---
builtin/apply.c | 3 +++
t/t4254-am-corrupt.sh | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 t/t4254-am-corrupt.sh
diff --git a/builtin/apply.c b/builtin/apply.c
index f2edc52..aaa39fe 100644
--- a/builtin/apply.c
+++ b/builtin/apply.c
@@ -1407,6 +1407,9 @@ static int find_header(char *line, unsigned long size, int *hdrsize, struct patc
"%d leading pathname components (line %d)" , p_value, linenr);
patch->old_name = patch->new_name = patch->def_name;
}
+ if (!patch->is_delete && !patch->new_name)
+ die("git diff header lacks filename information "
+ "(line %d)", linenr);
patch->is_toplevel_relative = 1;
*hdrsize = git_hdr_len;
return offset;
diff --git a/t/t4254-am-corrupt.sh b/t/t4254-am-corrupt.sh
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b7da95f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t4254-am-corrupt.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+test_description='git am with corrupt input'
+. ./test-lib.sh
+
+# Note the missing "+++" line:
+cat > bad-patch.diff <<'EOF'
+From: A U Thor <au.thor@example.com>
+diff --git a/f b/f
+index 7898192..6178079 100644
+--- a/f
+@@ -1 +1 @@
+-a
++b
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success setup '
+ test $? = 0 &&
+ echo a > f &&
+ git add f &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m initial
+'
+
+# This used to fail before, too, but with a different diagnostic.
+# fatal: unable to write file '(null)' mode 100644: Bad address
+# Also, it had the unwanted side-effect of deleting f.
+test_expect_success 'try to apply corrupted patch' '
+ git am bad-patch.diff 2> actual
+ test $? = 1
+'
+
+cat > expected <<EOF
+fatal: git diff header lacks filename information (line 4)
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success 'compare diagnostic; ensure file is still here' '
+ test $? = 0 &&
+ test -f f &&
+ test_cmp expected actual
+'
+
+test_done
--
1.7.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] fix "git apply --index ..." not to deref NULL
2011-10-12 8:18 [PATCH] fix "git apply --index ..." not to deref NULL Jim Meyering
@ 2011-10-12 14:27 ` Jeff King
2011-10-12 14:33 ` Jim Meyering
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff King @ 2011-10-12 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jim Meyering; +Cc: git
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:18:01AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I noticed this when "git am CORRUPTED" unexpectedly failed with an
> odd diagnostic, and even removed one of the files it was supposed
> to have patched.
>
> Reproduce with any valid old/new patch from which you have removed
> the "+++ b/FILE" line. You'll see a diagnostic like this
>
> fatal: unable to write file '(null)' mode 100644: Bad address
>
> and you'll find that FILE has been removed.
Yikes. Your fix looks right to me.
> builtin/apply.c | 3 +++
> t/t4254-am-corrupt.sh | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 t/t4254-am-corrupt.sh
Missing executable bit on the new test.
-Peff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] fix "git apply --index ..." not to deref NULL
2011-10-12 14:27 ` Jeff King
@ 2011-10-12 14:33 ` Jim Meyering
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jim Meyering @ 2011-10-12 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff King; +Cc: git
Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:18:01AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
>> I noticed this when "git am CORRUPTED" unexpectedly failed with an
>> odd diagnostic, and even removed one of the files it was supposed
>> to have patched.
>>
>> Reproduce with any valid old/new patch from which you have removed
>> the "+++ b/FILE" line. You'll see a diagnostic like this
>>
>> fatal: unable to write file '(null)' mode 100644: Bad address
>>
>> and you'll find that FILE has been removed.
>
> Yikes. Your fix looks right to me.
>
>> builtin/apply.c | 3 +++
>> t/t4254-am-corrupt.sh | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 t/t4254-am-corrupt.sh
>
> Missing executable bit on the new test.
Thanks.
Fixed with this:
-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] fix "git apply --index ..." not to deref NULL
I noticed this when "git am CORRUPTED" unexpectedly failed with an
odd diagnostic, and even removed one of the files it was supposed
to have patched.
Reproduce with any valid old/new patch from which you have removed
the "+++ b/FILE" line. You'll see a diagnostic like this
fatal: unable to write file '(null)' mode 100644: Bad address
and you'll find that FILE has been removed.
The above is on glibc-based systems. On other systems, rather than
getting "null", you may provoke a segfault as git tries to
dereference the NULL file name.
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <meyering@redhat.com>
---
builtin/apply.c | 3 +++
t/t4254-am-corrupt.sh | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 t/t4254-am-corrupt.sh
diff --git a/builtin/apply.c b/builtin/apply.c
index f2edc52..aaa39fe 100644
--- a/builtin/apply.c
+++ b/builtin/apply.c
@@ -1407,6 +1407,9 @@ static int find_header(char *line, unsigned long size, int *hdrsize, struct patc
"%d leading pathname components (line %d)" , p_value, linenr);
patch->old_name = patch->new_name = patch->def_name;
}
+ if (!patch->is_delete && !patch->new_name)
+ die("git diff header lacks filename information "
+ "(line %d)", linenr);
patch->is_toplevel_relative = 1;
*hdrsize = git_hdr_len;
return offset;
diff --git a/t/t4254-am-corrupt.sh b/t/t4254-am-corrupt.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..b7da95f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t4254-am-corrupt.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+test_description='git am with corrupt input'
+. ./test-lib.sh
+
+# Note the missing "+++" line:
+cat > bad-patch.diff <<'EOF'
+From: A U Thor <au.thor@example.com>
+diff --git a/f b/f
+index 7898192..6178079 100644
+--- a/f
+@@ -1 +1 @@
+-a
++b
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success setup '
+ test $? = 0 &&
+ echo a > f &&
+ git add f &&
+ test_tick &&
+ git commit -m initial
+'
+
+# This used to fail before, too, but with a different diagnostic.
+# fatal: unable to write file '(null)' mode 100644: Bad address
+# Also, it had the unwanted side-effect of deleting f.
+test_expect_success 'try to apply corrupted patch' '
+ git am bad-patch.diff 2> actual
+ test $? = 1
+'
+
+cat > expected <<EOF
+fatal: git diff header lacks filename information (line 4)
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success 'compare diagnostic; ensure file is still here' '
+ test $? = 0 &&
+ test -f f &&
+ test_cmp expected actual
+'
+
+test_done
--
1.7.7
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-12 14:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-10-12 8:18 [PATCH] fix "git apply --index ..." not to deref NULL Jim Meyering
2011-10-12 14:27 ` Jeff King
2011-10-12 14:33 ` Jim Meyering
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox