Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Michael Montalbo <mmontalbo@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] fixing expensive http test timeouts
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:05:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <akOGzAq8Is7ghgIM@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqik71xqtc.fsf@gitster.g>

On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 09:19:11AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> 
> >> pushes only to "cast in stone" branches.  If there are other
> >> branches that deserve to be tested with TEST_LONG upon other events
> >> that the existing GitHub Actions CI does not trigger, it may be good
> >> to have GitLab CI cover them, perhaps?
> >
> > I'm a bit hesitant to do such a split, mostly because the canonical
> > source of truth that the project typically uses is GitHub's CI. So I
> > want us at GitLab to be able to catch the same issues that GitHub would
> > flag. And if GitLab's CI stopped detecting everything that GitHub does,
> > then the result would likely be that we often create merge requests on
> > both platforms, which would only result in more wasted resources.
> 
> I didn't suggest splitting them into two circles that overlap but
> each with area only it covers, though.  GitLab's coverage can be
> superset to GitHub's and that would satify what I suggested.

Fair.

> FWIW, I do not consider GitHub's CI "the canonical source" at all.
> It is a very handy service to use to check how well we are doing,
> but from time to time it has its own hiccups ;-).

Well, GitLab of course has its own share of hiccups, like for example
the Chocolatey issues we've been facing.

> What can we do to make the visibility of GitLab's CI more prominent?
> 
> I know where the CI jobs that are triggered when I push out the
> integration branches are found at GitHub's website[*], but I do not
> think I know the corresponding one at GitLab, for example, and I
> think that is a shame.

The pipelines of the official mirror can be found at [1]. We might for
example add something like the below patch to our README.md to make it
more discoverable.

Patrick

[1]: https://gitlab.com/git-scm/git/-/pipelines

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index d87bca1b8c..9ad77fdf7e 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-[![Build status](https://github.com/git/git/workflows/CI/badge.svg)](https://github.com/git/git/actions?query=branch%3Amaster+event%3Apush)
+[![GitHub build status](https://github.com/git/git/workflows/CI/badge.svg)](https://github.com/git/git/actions?query=branch%3Amaster+event%3Apush)
+[![GitLab build status](https://gitlab.com/git-scm/git/badges/master/pipeline.svg)](https://gitlab.com/git-scm/git/-/pipelines?ref=master)
 
 Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system
 =========================================================

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-30  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-20 15:33 [RFH] Why do osx CI jobs so unreliable? Michael Montalbo
2026-06-21 21:34 ` Jeff King
2026-06-22  4:42   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-22  9:47     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-22  9:55       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-22 10:29         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-26  3:27           ` Michael Montalbo
2026-06-26  5:16             ` Jeff King
2026-06-26 10:50               ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-26 13:45                 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-26 23:26                 ` Michael Montalbo
2026-06-28  7:57                   ` [PATCH 0/3] fixing expensive http test timeouts Jeff King
2026-06-28  8:00                     ` [PATCH 1/3] t/lib-httpd: bump apache timeout Jeff King
2026-06-28  8:03                     ` [PATCH 2/3] t5551: put many-tags case into its own repo Jeff King
2026-06-28 21:44                       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-29  0:34                         ` Jeff King
2026-06-29 14:42                           ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-29 20:36                             ` Jeff King
2026-06-28  8:07                     ` [PATCH 3/3] t5551: pack refs after creating many tags Jeff King
2026-06-28 21:25                       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-29  5:57                       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-29 20:35                         ` Jeff King
2026-06-30  9:05                           ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-29  7:33                     ` [PATCH 0/3] fixing expensive http test timeouts Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-29 14:39                       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-29 16:09                         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-06-29 16:19                           ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-30  9:05                             ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2026-06-26 23:43                 ` [RFH] Why do osx CI jobs so unreliable? Jeff King
2026-06-22  5:05   ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=akOGzAq8Is7ghgIM@pks.im \
    --to=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=mmontalbo@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox