From: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
To: Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de>
Cc: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
msysGit <msysgit@googlegroups.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Should we discuss Windows-related changes on git@vger.kernel.org?
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:56:46 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807111349470.3640@eeepc-johanness> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DDFD7E3B-8401-4EA0-9BBA-C9D8E25998A3@zib.de>
Hi,
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Steffen Prohaska wrote:
> I decided to stop queuing changes in 4msysgit. Instead I'd like to
> bring the diff between Junio's and 4msysgit's master to zero. This
> seems to be achievable after Junio merged Hannes' MinGW changes.
>
> I think all Windows-related changes to the git code base could be
> discussed directly on the main git list and the msysgit list would be
> reserved for the MinGW/MSYS runtime environment and the installer.
I disagree. Judging from the mails I read on the git list, Junio gets
really swamped by patches these days (what with our very productive GSoC
students).
I really think that we should discuss the patches on the msysGit list
first, whip them into shape, and then send them off.
Just think of those patches that were sent off, only to realize that they
were no longer needed. That should not have happened.
My 2p,
Dscho
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-11 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-11 8:07 Should we discuss Windows-related changes on git@vger.kernel.org? Steffen Prohaska
2008-07-11 11:56 ` Johannes Schindelin [this message]
2008-07-11 15:51 ` Steffen Prohaska
2008-07-11 15:57 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-11 16:24 ` Steffen Prohaska
2008-07-11 18:36 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-11 19:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-11 19:40 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-11 21:10 ` Steffen Prohaska
2008-07-11 21:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-11 23:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-11 23:37 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-12 8:07 ` Steffen Prohaska
2008-07-11 22:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-11 23:35 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-11 23:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-11 23:47 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-11 23:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 0:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-12 1:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 7:38 ` Steffen Prohaska
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.1.00.0807111349470.3640@eeepc-johanness \
--to=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=johannes.sixt@telecom.at \
--cc=msysgit@googlegroups.com \
--cc=prohaska@zib.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox