From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Steffen Prohaska <prohaska@zib.de>,
Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>,
msysGit <msysgit@googlegroups.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Should we discuss Windows-related changes on git@vger.kernel.org?
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:40:45 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0807111638130.3459@woody.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0807120033490.8950@racer>
On Sat, 12 Jul 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> I think that is a perfect example, since Hannes worked on it in mingw.git.
> AFAIR a few comments came through msysGit, and were incorporated. When
> everything was good for a first go at git@vger, it was sent, and the
> interface finalized.
Umm. Dscho - that was before the thing was merged.
Now that the basic mingw support is part of standard git, the situation
has changed.
That's the main issue here - if mingw support is in standard git (and it
is), then mingw issues that touch any non-mingw code should be discussed
where all the git developers are.
Can't you see the difference between the pre-merge and the post-merge
situation?
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-11 23:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-11 8:07 Should we discuss Windows-related changes on git@vger.kernel.org? Steffen Prohaska
2008-07-11 11:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-11 15:51 ` Steffen Prohaska
2008-07-11 15:57 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-11 16:24 ` Steffen Prohaska
2008-07-11 18:36 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-11 19:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-11 19:40 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-11 21:10 ` Steffen Prohaska
2008-07-11 21:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-11 23:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-11 23:37 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-12 8:07 ` Steffen Prohaska
2008-07-11 22:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-07-11 23:35 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-11 23:40 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2008-07-11 23:47 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-11 23:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 0:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-07-12 1:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-07-12 7:38 ` Steffen Prohaska
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.1.10.0807111638130.3459@woody.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=johannes.sixt@telecom.at \
--cc=msysgit@googlegroups.com \
--cc=prohaska@zib.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox