Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Pushkar Singh <pushkarkumarsingh1970@gmail.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, r.norouzi@proton.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] reflog: fix default expiry periods
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 08:53:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aroO0x0Ptp09ncx_@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924184331.GB747880@coredump.intra.peff.net>

On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 02:43:31PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 10:45:21AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 04:12:04PM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> > >
> > >> > >  #define REFLOG_EXPIRE_OPTIONS_INIT(now) { \
> > >> > > -	.default_expire_total = now - 30 * 24 * 3600, \
> > >> > > -	.default_expire_unreachable = now - 90 * 24 * 3600, \
> > >> > > +	.default_expire_total = now - 90 * 24 * 3600, \
> > >> > > +	.default_expire_unreachable = now - 30 * 24 * 3600, \
> > >> > >  }
> > >> > 
> > >> > and the fix is very straight-forward.
> > >> 
> > >> Is this something that we want to fast-track for Git 2.56?
> > >
> > > The breakage was in v2.50.0, so it is not a new regression. OTOH it
> > > seems quite obvious and low-risk. I'd be OK either way.
> > 
> > Yeah, I didn't know the breakage was that old.  Perhaps not many
> > people are paying attention to reflog expiration?
> 
> Quite probably. The default expiration dates are somewhat arbitrary, and
> the reflogs themselves are somewhat ephemeral. Probably people would
> notice most on stashes, but those are also somewhat ephemeral.

Oh, I didn't realize that, either. In that case I agree it's not
necessary to fast-track this. Thanks!

Patrick

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28  6:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-19 18:32 reflog expire: default expiry times swapped since 2.50 r.norouzi
2026-09-22 16:54 ` [PATCH] reflog: fix default expiry periods Pushkar Singh
2026-09-22 17:27   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-22 18:02     ` Jeff King
2026-09-23 12:21       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-23 10:21   ` [PATCH v2] " Pushkar Singh
2026-09-23 19:26     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-24 14:12       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-24 15:46         ` Jeff King
2026-09-24 17:45           ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-24 18:43             ` Jeff King
2026-09-28  6:53               ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2026-09-24 17:43         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-24 17:58     ` [PATCH v3] " Pushkar Singh
2026-09-24 18:26       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-28  7:02       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-28 14:50         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-29  5:45           ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-09-29 18:31             ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aroO0x0Ptp09ncx_@pks.im \
    --to=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=pushkarkumarsingh1970@gmail.com \
    --cc=r.norouzi@proton.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox