Re: [PATCH] notes: do not drop notes written by a concurrent process

[Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>]

On Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 03:16:01PM -0700, Farid Zakaria wrote:
> On Thu Oct 29, 2026 at 2:42 PM PDT, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > "Farid Zakaria" <farid.m.zakaria@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> I felt confident reviewing the current patch at it's current state
> >> (AI-assisted) and I do concur that it's a net-positive change in the
> >> interim.
> >
> > Sorry, but I find the above very confusing, and I cannot figure out
> > who is reviewing whose patch, and who is concuring whose statement
> > that said what.
> 
> It's because I bottom-posted; I thought it might be easier to read that
> way -- I guess not.
> 
> I was just trying to say that I felt confident in my comprehension of
> this current patch, and agreed with Kristoffer that it's a positive
> change as it stands, although the algorithm could be improved to handle
> cases with different branches as mentioned.
> 
> (hopefully that's a little more concise and clear)

Are we talking to a meat proxy here?

Patrick