Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] format-patch: simplify get_notes_arg parameters

["Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com>]

On Fri, Oct 2, 2026, at 21:07, Kristoffer Haugsbakk wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2026, at 19:28, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com writes:
>>
>>> From: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
>>>
>>> git-format-patch(1) passes on the notes behavior that it is using for
>>> the patches to git-range-diff(1). In turn you get the same Git notes
>>> displayed in the range diff as the ones you used to generate the
>>> patches. And that makes sense in most cases.
>>>
>>> However, I often make notes between series versions that mostly prepend
>>> ...
>>> something like an alias set up with it. But why spend code closing
>>> that door? There is no usability upside to erroring out.
>>
>> This is somewhat shared with the next step, but the commit message
>> includes a lengthy narrative of the author's thought process ("An
>> off/on switch is enough for this behavior...", "But now we are faced
>> with a problem...", "Well, we can't. Therefore we need...").
>>
>> Can we strip out the conversational journey?  The log message should
>> be a concise, permanent technical reference explaining the problem
>> (range diff notes inherit patch notes, which may contain irrelevant
>> iteration changelogs) and the solution (the new options and the
>> .override flag).
>
> Sure.
>[snip]

Sorry about this duplicate that message that replied to the wrong
email as well.