From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>,
"D . Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] format-patch: learn --[no-]range-diff-notes
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2026 10:28:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqy0cgvwpi.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <V3_format-patch_learn_--range-diff-notes.d3b@m5gid.xyz> (kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com's message of "Fri, 2 Oct 2026 12:56:39 +0200")
kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com writes:
> From: Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
>
> git-format-patch(1) passes on the notes behavior that it is using for
> the patches to git-range-diff(1). In turn you get the same Git notes
> displayed in the range diff as the ones you used to generate the
> patches. And that makes sense in most cases.
>
> However, I often make notes between series versions that mostly prepend
> ...
> something like an alias set up with it. But why spend code closing
> that door? There is no usability upside to erroring out.
This is somewhat shared with the next step, but the commit message
includes a lengthy narrative of the author's thought process ("An
off/on switch is enough for this behavior...", "But now we are faced
with a problem...", "Well, we can't. Therefore we need...").
Can we strip out the conversational journey? The log message should
be a concise, permanent technical reference explaining the problem
(range diff notes inherit patch notes, which may contain irrelevant
iteration changelogs) and the solution (the new options and the
.override flag).
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-format-patch.adoc b/Documentation/git-format-patch.adoc
> index 191f64b77d1..5907f299a8d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-format-patch.adoc
> +++ b/Documentation/git-format-patch.adoc
> @@ -378,6 +378,21 @@ case is to show comparison with an older iteration of the same
> topic and the tool should find more correspondence between the two
> sets of patches.
>
> +`--range-diff-notes=<ref>`::
> +`--no-range-diff-notes`::
> + Used with `--range-diff`, tweak what notes to display in the
> + range diff.
> ++
> +The default behavior is to display the same notes in the range diff as
> +on the patches; see `--notes`. But you can use these options to use a
> +different list of notes. For example, say you have given three notes
> +refs to `--notes`. At this point those same three notes will be
> +displayed in the range diff. But then you pass
> +`--range-diff-notes=<ref>`. Now the range diff will only display
> +_<ref>_. You can of course pass more refs to this option, just like
> +`--notes`. And you can also turn off all range diff notes with
> +`--no-range-diff-notes`.
Very chatty and colloquial. A technical reference manual should be
concise and direct. Here is my attempt to condense it down to make
it more readable:
By default, '--range-diff' displays the same notes as the patches
(see '--notes'). Use '--range-diff-notes=<ref>' to specify a
different notes ref for the range diff. This option can be given
multiple times to show notes from multiple refs. Use
'--no-range-diff-notes' to disable notes in the range diff.
> diff --git a/builtin/log.c b/builtin/log.c
> index 560af00e2fd..d70101f0755 100644
> --- a/builtin/log.c
> +++ b/builtin/log.c
> @@ -1327,15 +1327,56 @@ static void prepare_cover_text(struct pretty_print_context *pp,
> strbuf_release(&subject_sb);
> }
>
> +struct rdiff_notes {
> + /*
> + * True if we want to override the notes behavior
> + * of 'format-patch'
> + */
> + bool override;
> + struct string_list notes;
> +};
> +
> +static int rdiff_notes_cb(const struct option *option,
> + const char *arg,
> + int unset)
> +{
> + struct rdiff_notes *rdiff_notes = option->value;
> +
> + rdiff_notes->override = 1;
> +
> + /*
> + * The rest is the same as
> + * parse-options-cb.c:parse_opt_string_list
> + */
Hmph, I wonder if it is more future-proof to wrap the string-list
callback like so ...
static int rdiff_notes_cb(const struct option *option,
const char *arg,
int unset)
{
struct option opt = *option;
struct rdiff_notes *rdiff_notes = opt.value;
rdiff_notes->override = 1;
opt.value = &rdiff_notes->notes;
return parse_opt_string_list(&opt, arg, unset);
}
... than copying and letting the code drift apart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-02 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 20:35 [PATCH 0/3] format-patch: learn --[no-]range-diff-notes kristofferhaugsbakk
2026-08-24 20:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] format-patch: simplify get_notes_arg parameters kristofferhaugsbakk
2026-08-24 20:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] revision.h: rename struct member to reflect notes role kristofferhaugsbakk
2026-08-24 20:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] format-patch: learn --[no-]range-diff-notes kristofferhaugsbakk
2026-08-24 22:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-25 18:36 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-08-28 0:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-28 13:48 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-08-28 17:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-02 13:19 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-09-06 7:22 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-09-06 13:37 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-06 16:44 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-09-06 17:57 ` D. Ben Knoble
2026-09-06 17:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-09 18:08 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-09-09 19:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-26 18:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " kristofferhaugsbakk
2026-09-26 18:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] format-patch: simplify get_notes_arg parameters kristofferhaugsbakk
2026-09-26 18:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] format-patch: learn --[no-]range-diff-notes kristofferhaugsbakk
2026-09-27 12:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-27 19:42 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-09-28 15:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-28 15:53 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-10-02 10:56 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " kristofferhaugsbakk
2026-10-02 10:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] format-patch: simplify get_notes_arg parameters kristofferhaugsbakk
2026-10-02 16:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-02 18:51 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-10-02 19:07 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-10-02 19:13 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-10-02 10:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] format-patch: learn --[no-]range-diff-notes kristofferhaugsbakk
2026-10-02 17:28 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-10-02 18:56 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-10-04 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " kristofferhaugsbakk
2026-10-04 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] format-patch: simplify get_notes_arg parameters kristofferhaugsbakk
2026-10-04 10:17 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] format-patch: learn --[no-]range-diff-notes kristofferhaugsbakk
2026-10-04 16:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-04 17:30 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-10-04 17:58 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] " kristofferhaugsbakk
2026-10-04 17:58 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] format-patch: simplify get_notes_arg parameters kristofferhaugsbakk
2026-10-04 17:58 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] format-patch: learn --[no-]range-diff-notes kristofferhaugsbakk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqy0cgvwpi.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=ben.knoble@gmail.com \
--cc=code@khaugsbakk.name \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).