* git push should automatically push to remote tracking branch
@ 2009-10-18 20:20 Mohit Aron
2009-10-18 23:11 ` Tomas Carnecky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mohit Aron @ 2009-10-18 20:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Hello,
I've been using git for around a year now and I'm continuing to find
the 'git push' API rather cumbersome. My workflow is as follows. I
typically have a local branch track a remote branch and want to pull
and push changes back and forth. The names of the local and remote
branches are different. Even so, while 'git pull' is enough to pull
changes, 'git push' is not. Instead, the pull requires a full refspec
to be specified which gets real cumbersome and error prone.
Say my local branch name is foo and it is tracking a remote release
branch of a product. Say the remote's name is origin and corresponding
branch there is 6.1. 'git pull' nicely fetches and merges changes
submitted by others in the remote branch to my branch foo. However, to
do a push, I need to call:
git push origin HEAD:6.1
Since my local branch has been setup to track the remote branch, I
shouldn't have to specify all this in the 'git push' command. It'll be
great if 'git push' were to support a variant that automatically
allows pushing to the remotely tracked branch. This is the typical
workflow with other version control systems too.
If anyone knows a simpler alternative I can use in Git, please let me
know. Otherwise, it'll be great if such a feature could be added to
Git in the future.
- Mohit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: git push should automatically push to remote tracking branch
2009-10-18 20:20 git push should automatically push to remote tracking branch Mohit Aron
@ 2009-10-18 23:11 ` Tomas Carnecky
2009-10-19 3:50 ` Mohit Aron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tomas Carnecky @ 2009-10-18 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mohit Aron; +Cc: git
On Oct 18, 2009, at 10:20 PM, Mohit Aron wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been using git for around a year now and I'm continuing to find
> the 'git push' API rather cumbersome. My workflow is as follows. I
> typically have a local branch track a remote branch and want to pull
> and push changes back and forth. The names of the local and remote
> branches are different. Even so, while 'git pull' is enough to pull
> changes, 'git push' is not. Instead, the pull requires a full refspec
> to be specified which gets real cumbersome and error prone.
>
> Say my local branch name is foo and it is tracking a remote release
> branch of a product. Say the remote's name is origin and corresponding
> branch there is 6.1. 'git pull' nicely fetches and merges changes
> submitted by others in the remote branch to my branch foo. However, to
> do a push, I need to call:
>
> git push origin HEAD:6.1
>
> Since my local branch has been setup to track the remote branch, I
> shouldn't have to specify all this in the 'git push' command. It'll be
> great if 'git push' were to support a variant that automatically
> allows pushing to the remotely tracked branch. This is the typical
> workflow with other version control systems too.
>
> If anyone knows a simpler alternative I can use in Git, please let me
> know. Otherwise, it'll be great if such a feature could be added to
> Git in the future.
$ git config push.default tracking
tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-19 5:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-18 20:20 git push should automatically push to remote tracking branch Mohit Aron
2009-10-18 23:11 ` Tomas Carnecky
2009-10-19 3:50 ` Mohit Aron
2009-10-19 5:06 ` Jeff King
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox