From: Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Cc: egg_mushroomcow@foxmail.com, bootaina702@gmail.com, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 11/11] git-gui: add gui and pick as explicit subcommands
Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 11:42:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fad43240-1089-4447-b97d-ee553c34eef1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e336544b-941d-43ed-890f-2b8950dbaf88@kdbg.org>
On 5/16/26 4:18 AM, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Am 14.05.26 um 16:33 schrieb Mark Levedahl:
>> git-gui accepts subcommands blame | browser | citool, and assumes the
>> subcommand is 'gui' if none is actually given, But, git gui also has a
>> repository picker (choose_repository::pick) that can create a new
>> repository + worktree, or choose an existing one, switch to that, and
>> the run the gui. The user has no direct control over invoking the
>> picker, instead the picker is triggered by failure in the repository /
>> worktree discover process: this includes being started in a directory
>> not controlled by git, which is probably the intended use case.
>>
>> The picker can appear when the user has no intention of creating a new
>> worktree, and the user cannot use the picker to create a new worktree
>> inside another.
>>
>> So, add two new explicit subcommands:
>> gui - Run the gui if repository/worktree discovery succeeds, or die
>> with an error message, but never run the picker.
>> pick - First run the picker, regardless, then start the gui in
>> the chosen worktree.
>>
>> Nothing in this changes the prior behavior, the alternates above must be
>> explicitly selected to see any change.
> OK.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> git-gui.sh | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/git-gui.sh b/git-gui.sh
>> index 3a83dd5..c56aeef 100755
>> --- a/git-gui.sh
>> +++ b/git-gui.sh
>> @@ -1021,6 +1021,7 @@ proc load_config {include_global} {
>> ##
>> ## feature option selection
>>
>> +set run_picker_on_error 1
>> if {[regexp {^git-(.+)$} [file tail $argv0] _junk subcommand]} {
>> unset _junk
>> } else {
>> @@ -1030,6 +1031,7 @@ if {$subcommand eq {gui.sh}} {
>> set subcommand gui
>> }
>> if {$subcommand eq {gui} && [llength $argv] > 0} {
>> + set run_picker_on_error 0
>> set subcommand [lindex $argv 0]
>> set argv [lrange $argv 1 end]
>> }
>> @@ -1047,6 +1049,7 @@ blame {
>> disable_option multicommit
>> disable_option branch
>> disable_option transport
>> + set run_picker_on_error 0
>> }
>> citool {
>> enable_option singlecommit
>> @@ -1055,6 +1058,7 @@ citool {
>> disable_option multicommit
>> disable_option branch
>> disable_option transport
>> + set run_picker_on_error 0
>>
>> while {[llength $argv] > 0} {
>> set a [lindex $argv 0]
> Can we please use the available disable_option and enable_option feature
> instead of a new variable. Just for consistency around repository discovery.
>
>> @@ -1162,14 +1166,28 @@ proc pick_repo {} {
>> set picked 1
>> }
>>
>> +# run repository picker if explicitly requested
>> +switch -- $subcommand {
>> + pick {
>> + pick_repo
>> + set subcommand gui
>> + set run_picker_on_error 0
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
> It just feels wrong to have a new pick_repo call before repository
> discovery. Can we not treat this case below as if regular repository
> discovery failed and then end up in the existing call of pick_repo?
So, your suggestion is to create an error inside the catch clause, assure GIT_VAR and
GIT_WORK_TREE are unset so we don't throw and error message and abort, and then fall
through to the existing pick_repo clause?
I think this makes code less understandable and more complicated. As written, the user
selects the repo, and now the standard discovery runs except that the picker cannot be re-run.
I like the current structure better.
>> # find repository.
>> if {[catch {
>> set _gitdir [git rev-parse --absolute-git-dir]
>> } err]} {
>> if {[is_gitvars_error $err]} {
>> exit 1
>> - } else {
>> + }
>> + if {$run_picker_on_error} {
>> pick_repo
>> + } else {
>> + catch {wm withdraw .}
>> + error_popup [strcat [mc "Git directory not found:"] "\n\n$err"]
>> + exit 1
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -3051,7 +3069,7 @@ gui {
>> # fall through to setup UI for commits
>> }
>> default {
>> - set err "[mc usage:] $argv0 \[{blame|browser|citool}\]"
>> + set err "[mc usage:] $argv0 \[{blame|browser|citool|gui|pick}\]"
>> if {[tk windowingsystem] eq "win32"} {
>> wm withdraw .
>> tk_messageBox -icon error -message $err \
> We don't need to switch on the new subcommands?
>
> As a follow-up to my comment on 04/11: How relevant is it that variable
> $picked is set in a 'git gui pick' invocation?
>
> -- Hannes
>
Repeating, I need to understand what "picked" really does in the gui. Will definitely
address your question.
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-16 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-21 16:28 [PATCH] git-gui: handle bare repo or missing worktree Shroom Moo
2026-04-29 6:58 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-04-29 17:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] git-gui: protect rev-parse --show-toplevel call Shroom Moo
2026-04-29 20:14 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-04-30 10:02 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] git-gui: handle missing worktree and separated gitdir Shroom Moo
2026-04-30 16:18 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-01 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] git-gui: handle missing worktree and separated Shroom Moo
2026-05-01 13:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] git-gui: handle missing worktree and separated gitdir Johannes Sixt
2026-05-01 16:42 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-02 21:51 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-03 8:53 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-04 15:13 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-05 3:40 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-06 7:32 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-06 11:27 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-06 12:57 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-06 14:05 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-07 5:09 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v4 " Shroom Moo
2026-05-04 14:59 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] git-gui: restructure repository startup Shroom Moo
2026-05-06 7:15 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-06 20:27 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] git-gui: robustify startup and fix environment handling Shroom Moo
2026-05-09 13:37 ` [PATCH v7 " Shroom Moo
2026-05-14 14:28 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 00/11] Improve git gui operation without a worktree Mark Levedahl
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 01/11] git-gui: allow specifying path '.' to the browser Mark Levedahl
2026-05-15 15:54 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-16 13:38 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 02/11] git-gui: refactor browser / blame argument parsing Mark Levedahl
2026-05-15 15:56 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-16 14:21 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 03/11] git-gui: guard set/unset of GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE Mark Levedahl
2026-05-15 15:58 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-16 14:25 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 04/11] git-gui: put choose_repository::pick in a proc Mark Levedahl
2026-05-15 11:00 ` Aina Boot
2026-05-15 13:33 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-15 15:59 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-16 14:29 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 05/11] git-gui: use --absolute-git-dir Mark Levedahl
2026-05-15 16:00 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-16 14:33 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 06/11] git gui: GIT_DIR / GIT_WORK_TREE make any discovery error fatal Mark Levedahl
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 07/11] git-gui: use rev-parse exclusively to find a repository Mark Levedahl
2026-05-15 16:06 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-16 14:38 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 08/11] git-gui: simplify [is_bare] to report if a worktree is known Mark Levedahl
2026-05-16 8:12 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 09/11] git-gui: support using repository parent dir as a worktree Mark Levedahl
2026-05-16 8:14 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-16 14:48 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 10/11] git-gui: improve worktree discovery Mark Levedahl
2026-05-16 8:16 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-16 15:28 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-14 14:33 ` [PATCH v1 11/11] git-gui: add gui and pick as explicit subcommands Mark Levedahl
2026-05-16 8:18 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-16 15:42 ` Mark Levedahl [this message]
2026-05-16 8:28 ` [PATCH v1 00/11] Improve git gui operation without a worktree Johannes Sixt
[not found] ` <20260509133756.1367-1-egg_mushroomcow@foxmail.com>
2026-05-09 13:37 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] git-gui: restructure repository startup Shroom Moo
2026-05-15 8:26 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-09 13:37 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] git-gui: disable gitk visualization when no worktree available Shroom Moo
2026-05-15 8:28 ` Johannes Sixt
2026-05-09 13:37 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] git-gui: handle GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE early Shroom Moo
2026-05-15 8:28 ` Johannes Sixt
[not found] ` <20260506202751.3294-1-egg_mushroomcow@foxmail.com>
2026-05-06 20:27 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] git-gui: restructure repository startup Shroom Moo
2026-05-06 20:27 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] git-gui: disable gitk visualization when no worktree available Shroom Moo
2026-05-06 20:27 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] git-gui: handle GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE early Shroom Moo
2026-05-07 15:50 ` Mark Levedahl
2026-05-09 8:46 ` Aina Boot
2026-05-09 9:55 ` Shroom Moo
2026-04-29 18:28 ` [PATCH] git-gui: handle bare repo or missing worktree Shroom Moo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fad43240-1089-4447-b97d-ee553c34eef1@gmail.com \
--to=mlevedahl@gmail.com \
--cc=bootaina702@gmail.com \
--cc=egg_mushroomcow@foxmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox