Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>, Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>,
	Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>,
	Kristofer Karlsson <krka@spotify.com>,
	Kristofer Karlsson <krka@spotify.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] fetch: write commit-graph using updated refs only
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2026 09:46:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pull.2239.v2.git.1791279992.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.2239.git.1790930019.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

When fetch.writeCommitGraph is enabled, the commit-graph is rebuilt from all
reachable refs after every fetch. This is unnecessarily expensive on
repositories with many refs, since add_ref_to_set() validates each ref
against the odb.

This series optimizes the commit-graph write by using only the newly updated
refs as seeds instead of scanning all refs. Since fetch writes the
commit-graph in split mode, the newly fetched history is added as a new
layer on top of the existing chain. A three-mode enum (REACHABLE / TIPS /
SKIP) makes the policy explicit:

 * No-op fetch: skip the commit-graph write entirely
 * Updated refs + existing graph: write incrementally from updated tips only
 * No existing graph or multi-remote fetch: fall back to full reachable scan

Patch 1 adds a commit-info subcommand to test-tool read-graph for verifying
graph contents in tests.

Patch 2 implements the optimization in builtin/fetch.c with tests covering
the incremental, unrelated-commit, no-op, fallback, and shallow-rejected
cases.

Benchmark on a synthetic setup: git.git with 200K extra packed refs (~206K
total), a local file:// remote, an existing split commit-graph and a warm
page cache. Times are the median of 9 runs of the trace2 region
fetch/write-commit-graph:

scenario          before    after
no-op fetch       380 ms    (skipped)
1 ref updated     357 ms    9.3 ms
10 refs updated   359 ms    8.9 ms


Changes since v1:

 * Explain in the commit message that fetch writes in split mode, so the new
   tips are added as a new layer on top of the existing chain, and that the
   incremental path relies on this (a non-split write would replace the
   graph with only the closure of the seeds).
 * Extend the incremental test to check that a local-only commit, which was
   in the graph before the fetch but is not reachable from the fetched tips,
   is still in the graph afterwards.
 * Add benchmark numbers to the commit message.
 * Add a comment explaining why shallow-rejected refs are skipped when
   collecting the updated tips (like store_updated_refs(), since their
   history is incomplete), and mention it in the commit message.
 * Add a test in t5537 for a fetch with fetch.writeCommitGraph where a ref
   is rejected because it would require changes to .git/shallow. Without the
   check, the commit-graph write dies on the missing parent.

Kristofer Karlsson (2):
  test-tool read-graph: add commit-info subcommand
  fetch: write commit-graph using updated refs only

 builtin/fetch.c            | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 commit-graph.c             |  2 +-
 commit-graph.h             |  1 +
 t/helper/test-read-graph.c | 23 ++++++++++++-
 t/t5510-fetch.sh           | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 t/t5537-fetch-shallow.sh   | 28 ++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)


base-commit: 0f8e75abebff0877cae681a3d5ff31ac47f54220
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-2239%2Fspkrka%2Fkrka%2Fincremental-commit-graph-v2
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-2239/spkrka/krka/incremental-commit-graph-v2
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/2239

Range-diff vs v1:

 1:  36cc3ff3b3 = 1:  36cc3ff3b3 test-tool read-graph: add commit-info subcommand
 2:  fee92f3c20 ! 2:  7507354cc9 fetch: write commit-graph using updated refs only
     @@ Commit message
      
          Since do_fetch() already knows which refs were updated, collect them
          into an oidset and then pass them directly to write_commit_graph().
     -    In split mode, close_reachable() walks from the updated tips and
     -    stops at commits already present in the graph, efficiently adding
     -    the newly fetched history.  This reachability closure also covers
     -    auto-followed tags, since their targets are reachable from the
     -    fetched tips that caused them to be auto-followed.
     +    fetch always writes the commit-graph in split mode, so this adds a
     +    new layer on top of the existing chain rather than replacing it:
     +    close_reachable() walks from the updated tips and stops at commits
     +    already present in the graph, so the new layer only contains the
     +    newly fetched history, and commits covered by the existing layers
     +    remain covered.  This relies on split mode; a non-split write would
     +    replace the graph with just the closure of the seeds.
     +
     +    The reachability closure also covers auto-followed tags, since their
     +    targets are reachable from the fetched tips that caused them to be
     +    auto-followed.
     +
     +    Refs that are rejected because they would require changes to
     +    .git/shallow are skipped, just like store_updated_refs() does.  Their
     +    objects are received but their history is incomplete, so walking from
     +    them would make the commit-graph write fail.
      
          After fetch_one() returns, call prepare_commit_graph() (which is
          made non-static by this commit) to determine the graph-write mode:
     @@ Commit message
          which periodically rebuilds the commit-graph from all reachable
          refs.
      
     +    The effect was measured on a synthetic setup: git.git with 200K
     +    extra packed refs (~206K total), a local file:// remote, an existing
     +    split commit-graph and a warm page cache.  The times below are the
     +    median of 9 runs of the trace2 region fetch/write-commit-graph:
     +
     +        scenario          before    after
     +        no-op fetch       380 ms    (skipped)
     +        1 ref updated     357 ms    9.3 ms
     +        10 refs updated   359 ms    8.9 ms
     +
          Signed-off-by: Kristofer Karlsson <krka@spotify.com>
      
       ## builtin/fetch.c ##
     @@ builtin/fetch.c: out:
      +	struct ref *rm;
      +	for (rm = ref_map; rm; rm = rm->next) {
      +		struct commit *commit;
     ++		/*
     ++		 * Like store_updated_refs(), skip shallow-rejected refs:
     ++		 * they are not stored, and their history is incomplete.
     ++		 */
      +		if (rm->status == REF_STATUS_REJECT_SHALLOW)
      +			continue;
      +		if (is_null_oid(&rm->old_oid))
     @@ t/t5510-fetch.sh: test_expect_success 'fetch.writeCommitGraph' '
      +	git init incremental-source &&
      +	test_commit -C incremental-source one &&
      +	git clone incremental-source incremental-dest &&
     ++	test_commit -C incremental-dest local &&
      +	git -C incremental-dest commit-graph write --reachable --split &&
      +	test_commit -C incremental-source two &&
      +	test_commit -C incremental-source three &&
      +	(
      +		cd incremental-dest &&
      +		git -c fetch.writeCommitGraph=true fetch origin &&
     -+		test-tool read-graph commit-info three two
     ++		test-tool read-graph commit-info three two local
      +	)
      +'
      +
     @@ t/t5510-fetch.sh: test_expect_success 'fetch.writeCommitGraph' '
       test_expect_success 'fetch.writeCommitGraph with submodules' '
       	test_config_global protocol.file.allow always &&
       	git clone dups super &&
     +
     + ## t/t5537-fetch-shallow.sh ##
     +@@ t/t5537-fetch-shallow.sh: test_expect_success 'fetch that requires changes in .git/shallow is filtered' '
     + 	)
     + '
     + 
     ++test_expect_success 'fetch.writeCommitGraph skips refs that require changes in .git/shallow' '
     ++	git clone --no-local --depth=2 .git shallow-graph &&
     ++	(
     ++		cd shallow-graph &&
     ++		git checkout --orphan no-shallow &&
     ++		commit no-shallow
     ++	) &&
     ++	git init notshallow-graph &&
     ++	git -C notshallow-graph -c fetch.writeCommitGraph=true \
     ++		fetch ../shallow-graph/.git "refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/shallow/*" &&
     ++	(
     ++		cd shallow-graph &&
     ++		commit no-shallow-2
     ++	) &&
     ++	rejected=$(git -C shallow-graph rev-parse main) &&
     ++	(
     ++		cd notshallow-graph &&
     ++		git -c fetch.writeCommitGraph=true \
     ++			fetch ../shallow-graph/.git "refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/shallow/*" &&
     ++		git for-each-ref --format="%(refname)" >actual.refs &&
     ++		echo refs/remotes/shallow/no-shallow >expect.refs &&
     ++		test_cmp expect.refs actual.refs &&
     ++		test-tool read-graph commit-info shallow/no-shallow &&
     ++		test_expect_code 1 \
     ++			test-tool read-graph commit-info $rejected 2>/dev/null
     ++	)
     ++'
     ++
     + test_expect_success 'fetch --update-shallow' '
     + 	(
     + 	cd shallow &&

-- 
gitgitgadget

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-06  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-02  8:33 [PATCH 0/2] fetch: write commit-graph using updated refs only Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-02  8:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] test-tool read-graph: add commit-info subcommand Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-02  8:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] fetch: write commit-graph using updated refs only Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-02 11:22   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-02 12:40     ` Kristofer Karlsson
2026-10-05  6:27       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-05 14:47         ` Kristofer Karlsson
2026-10-06  9:46 ` Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget [this message]
2026-10-06  9:46   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] test-tool read-graph: add commit-info subcommand Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-06  9:46   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] fetch: write commit-graph using updated refs only Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-07  6:39     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-07  7:33       ` Kristofer Karlsson
2026-10-07 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-07 14:22   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] test-tool read-graph: add commit-info subcommand Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-07 14:22   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] fetch: write commit-graph using updated refs only Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-08  6:01     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-08  6:49       ` Kristofer Karlsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=pull.2239.v2.git.1791279992.gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --to=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=krka@spotify.com \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=stolee@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox