From: "Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>, Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>,
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>,
Kristofer Karlsson <krka@spotify.com>,
Kristofer Karlsson <krka@spotify.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] fetch: write commit-graph using updated refs only
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 14:22:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pull.2239.v3.git.1791382977.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.2239.git.1790930019.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
When fetch.writeCommitGraph is enabled, the commit-graph is rebuilt from all
reachable refs after every fetch. This is unnecessarily expensive on
repositories with many refs, since add_ref_to_set() validates each ref
against the odb.
This series optimizes the commit-graph write by using only the newly updated
refs as seeds instead of scanning all refs. Since fetch writes the
commit-graph in split mode, the newly fetched history is added as a new
layer on top of the existing chain. A three-mode enum (REACHABLE / TIPS /
SKIP) makes the policy explicit:
* No-op fetch: skip the commit-graph write entirely
* Updated refs + existing graph: write incrementally from updated tips only
* No existing graph or multi-remote fetch: fall back to full reachable scan
Patch 1 adds a commit-info subcommand to test-tool read-graph for verifying
graph contents in tests.
Patch 2 implements the optimization in builtin/fetch.c with tests covering
the incremental, unrelated-commit, no-op, fallback, and shallow-rejected
cases.
Benchmark on a synthetic setup: git.git with 200K extra packed refs (~206K
total), a local file:// remote, an existing split commit-graph and a warm
page cache. Times are the median of 9 runs of the trace2 region
fetch/write-commit-graph:
scenario before after
no-op fetch 380 ms (skipped)
1 ref updated 357 ms 9.3 ms
10 refs updated 359 ms 8.9 ms
Changes since v2:
* Trim the commit message: inline the commit references, keep the
explanation of why the incremental write relies on split mode, and drop
the paragraphs that only restated the diff (collecting the tips,
auto-followed tags, skipping shallow-rejected refs).
* Reword the comment on skipping shallow-rejected refs without the
reference to store_updated_refs().
* Simplify the t5537 test by using "test_commit -C ... --no-tag" instead of
subshells.
Changes since v1:
* Explain in the commit message that fetch writes in split mode, so the new
tips are added as a new layer on top of the existing chain, and that the
incremental path relies on this (a non-split write would replace the
graph with only the closure of the seeds).
* Extend the incremental test to check that a local-only commit, which was
in the graph before the fetch but is not reachable from the fetched tips,
is still in the graph afterwards.
* Add benchmark numbers to the commit message.
* Add a comment explaining why shallow-rejected refs are skipped when
collecting the updated tips (like store_updated_refs(), since their
history is incomplete), and mention it in the commit message.
* Add a test in t5537 for a fetch with fetch.writeCommitGraph where a ref
is rejected because it would require changes to .git/shallow. Without the
check, the commit-graph write dies on the missing parent.
Kristofer Karlsson (2):
test-tool read-graph: add commit-info subcommand
fetch: write commit-graph using updated refs only
builtin/fetch.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
commit-graph.c | 2 +-
commit-graph.h | 1 +
t/helper/test-read-graph.c | 23 ++++++++++++-
t/t5510-fetch.sh | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
t/t5537-fetch-shallow.sh | 22 ++++++++++++
6 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
base-commit: 0f8e75abebff0877cae681a3d5ff31ac47f54220
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-2239%2Fspkrka%2Fkrka%2Fincremental-commit-graph-v3
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-2239/spkrka/krka/incremental-commit-graph-v3
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/2239
Range-diff vs v2:
1: 36cc3ff3b3 = 1: 36cc3ff3b3 test-tool read-graph: add commit-info subcommand
2: 7507354cc9 ! 2: 01da9857bc fetch: write commit-graph using updated refs only
@@ Metadata
## Commit message ##
fetch: write commit-graph using updated refs only
- When fetch.writeCommitGraph was introduced in
-
- 50f26bd035 (fetch: add fetch.writeCommitGraph config
- setting, 2019-09-02),
-
- the stated goal was to stay updated with the latest commits after
- fetching new objects. The implementation used
- write_commit_graph_reachable() because it was the only API available,
- but two things have changed since then:
+ When fetch.writeCommitGraph was introduced in 50f26bd035 (fetch: add
+ fetch.writeCommitGraph config setting, 2019-09-02), the stated goal
+ was to stay updated with the latest commits after fetching new
+ objects. The implementation used write_commit_graph_reachable()
+ because it was the only API available, but two things have changed
+ since then:
1. write_commit_graph() was added, and it accepts an explicit set of
commits as seeds, enabling more targeted commit-graph updates.
2. The ref-scanning callback add_ref_to_set() became more expensive
- in
- 630cd5194e (commit-graph.c: peel refs in 'add_ref_to_set',
- 2020-07-22)
- when it started to validate the refs against the odb
+ in 630cd5194e (commit-graph.c: peel refs in 'add_ref_to_set',
+ 2020-07-22) when it started to validate the refs against the odb
for correctness. On a repository with many refs, this makes the
full reachable scan unnecessarily costly for a targeted fetch.
@@ Commit message
(since that would require propagating the set of refs across process
boundaries).
- Since do_fetch() already knows which refs were updated, collect them
- into an oidset and then pass them directly to write_commit_graph().
- fetch always writes the commit-graph in split mode, so this adds a
- new layer on top of the existing chain rather than replacing it:
- close_reachable() walks from the updated tips and stops at commits
- already present in the graph, so the new layer only contains the
- newly fetched history, and commits covered by the existing layers
- remain covered. This relies on split mode; a non-split write would
- replace the graph with just the closure of the seeds.
-
- The reachability closure also covers auto-followed tags, since their
- targets are reachable from the fetched tips that caused them to be
- auto-followed.
-
- Refs that are rejected because they would require changes to
- .git/shallow are skipped, just like store_updated_refs() does. Their
- objects are received but their history is incomplete, so walking from
- them would make the commit-graph write fail.
+ This relies on the commit-graph write being additive, keeping the
+ commits that are already in the graph. fetch already operates in
+ this mode (COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_SPLIT) and now that becomes
+ required for correctness. Without that mode, the write would
+ replace the commit-graph and lose other commits.
After fetch_one() returns, call prepare_commit_graph() (which is
made non-static by this commit) to determine the graph-write mode:
@@ builtin/fetch.c: out:
+ for (rm = ref_map; rm; rm = rm->next) {
+ struct commit *commit;
+ /*
-+ * Like store_updated_refs(), skip shallow-rejected refs:
-+ * they are not stored, and their history is incomplete.
++ * Shallow-rejected refs are not stored and their history
++ * is incomplete, so skip them.
+ */
+ if (rm->status == REF_STATUS_REJECT_SHALLOW)
+ continue;
@@ t/t5537-fetch-shallow.sh: test_expect_success 'fetch that requires changes in .g
+test_expect_success 'fetch.writeCommitGraph skips refs that require changes in .git/shallow' '
+ git clone --no-local --depth=2 .git shallow-graph &&
-+ (
-+ cd shallow-graph &&
-+ git checkout --orphan no-shallow &&
-+ commit no-shallow
-+ ) &&
++ git -C shallow-graph checkout --orphan no-shallow &&
++ test_commit -C shallow-graph --no-tag no-shallow &&
+ git init notshallow-graph &&
+ git -C notshallow-graph -c fetch.writeCommitGraph=true \
+ fetch ../shallow-graph/.git "refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/shallow/*" &&
-+ (
-+ cd shallow-graph &&
-+ commit no-shallow-2
-+ ) &&
++ test_commit -C shallow-graph --no-tag no-shallow-2 &&
+ rejected=$(git -C shallow-graph rev-parse main) &&
+ (
+ cd notshallow-graph &&
--
gitgitgadget
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-02 8:33 [PATCH 0/2] fetch: write commit-graph using updated refs only Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-02 8:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] test-tool read-graph: add commit-info subcommand Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-02 8:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] fetch: write commit-graph using updated refs only Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-02 11:22 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-02 12:40 ` Kristofer Karlsson
2026-10-05 6:27 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-05 14:47 ` Kristofer Karlsson
2026-10-06 9:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-06 9:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] test-tool read-graph: add commit-info subcommand Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-06 9:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] fetch: write commit-graph using updated refs only Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-07 6:39 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-07 7:33 ` Kristofer Karlsson
2026-10-07 14:22 ` Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget [this message]
2026-10-07 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] test-tool read-graph: add commit-info subcommand Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-07 14:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] fetch: write commit-graph using updated refs only Kristofer Karlsson via GitGitGadget
2026-10-08 6:01 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-08 6:49 ` Kristofer Karlsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pull.2239.v3.git.1791382977.gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--to=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krka@spotify.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox