Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Pablo Sabater" <pabloosabaterr@gmail.com>
Cc: <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/3] cat-file: extract the transport ownership from get_remote_info()
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 06:42:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq33tqdjr0.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DMGGJIMVUXEG.WJSWR3E4POW1@gmail.com> (Pablo Sabater's message of "Wed, 28 Oct 2026 12:07:42 +0000")

"Pablo Sabater" <pabloosabaterr@gmail.com> writes:

> But with that in mind, what if in the future there's a transport without
> smart_options that does support object-info? The smart_options check is
> there because of "this transport can't do object-info", and nothing
> on the object-info path reads smart_options from what I checked.
>
> So I'm going to drop that die(). Later in the code there's already a 
> check on transport_fetch_object_info(), which looks for 
> fetch_object_info in the transport's vtable. It's a bit later, but it 
> checks the real capability and it will give less trouble in the future. 

That design decision makes a lot of sense.  Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-28 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-27  3:16 [PATCH RFC 0/3] cat-file: make remote-object-info request in batches Pablo Sabater
2026-10-27  3:16 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] cat-file: extract the transport ownership from get_remote_info() Pablo Sabater
2026-10-27 19:02   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-27 21:00     ` Pablo Sabater
2026-10-28  6:37       ` Junio C Hamano
2026-10-28 12:07         ` Pablo Sabater
2026-10-28 13:42           ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-10-27  3:16 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] cat-file: make remote-object-info request in batches Pablo Sabater
2026-10-27  3:16 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] cat-file: add --remote-max-batch option Pablo Sabater
2026-10-27 19:12 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] cat-file: make remote-object-info request in batches Junio C Hamano
2026-10-27 20:47   ` Pablo Sabater
2026-10-27 20:53     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq33tqdjr0.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabloosabaterr@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox