From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Tian Yuchen <cat@malon.dev>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
Ayush Chandekar <ayu.chandekar@gmail.com>,
Olamide Caleb Bello <belkid98@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] environment: reorder variables in repo_config_values structure
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 09:42:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq5x1nmc90.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dbcbb042-5c50-4569-9b18-3edcc7b1ef4b@malon.dev> (Tian Yuchen's message of "Thu, 6 Aug 2026 16:44:03 +0800")
Tian Yuchen <cat@malon.dev> writes:
> On 8/6/26 05:47, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Tian Yuchen <cat@malon.dev> writes:
>>
>>> Reorder the fields in struct repo_config_values and its initialization
>>> function to follow the order of configuration sections.
>>>
>>> Keeping the declaration and initialization order aligned makes the
>>> structure easier to review and maintain.
>>
>> Really?
>>
>> Do you have some automated tool to make sure these initialization
>> assignments in the environment.c file and declaration in the
>> environment.h file match the order in Documentation/config/*.adoc or
>> something else? Have you designated some list as the authoritative
>> source of truth to check these against? Without such a list to
>> check the code against and a mechanism to enforce the ordering, I
>> find it hard to agree with such a claim that this makes it easier to
>> maintain.
>
> I see.
>
>>
>> It is typical to list the structure members in the order of stricter
>> to looser alignment requirement of their types. I do not know how
>> strictly it is followed for "struct repo_config_values", but by
>> spreading pointer valued members more widely with smaller enums in
>> between, the change certainly is making the overall structure size
>> larger by requiring more padding between the members with different
>> alignment requirements. Not that we would have 100s of instances of
>> these structures.
>>
>
> Oh, I overlooked the size issue. Thanks for pointing out.
I didn't mean to "point out" any size issue. As I said, it is not
like we have hundreds of these, so padding bloat here and there
would not matter and if we get a readability boost by reordering
into a sensible order, that by itself could be a win.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 11:53 [PATCH 0/3] environment: clean up repository config handling Tian Yuchen
2026-08-05 11:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] environment: simplify repository config getters Tian Yuchen
2026-08-05 21:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-05 11:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] environment: clarify repository config getter documentation Tian Yuchen
2026-08-05 21:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-06 8:49 ` Tian Yuchen
2026-08-05 11:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] environment: reorder variables in repo_config_values structure Tian Yuchen
2026-08-05 21:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-06 8:44 ` Tian Yuchen
2026-08-06 16:42 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-08-07 8:26 ` Tian Yuchen
2026-08-06 9:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] environment: clean up repository config handling Tian Yuchen
2026-08-06 9:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] environment: simplify repository config getters Tian Yuchen
2026-08-06 16:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-07 8:30 ` Tian Yuchen
2026-08-06 9:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] environment: clarify repository config getter documentation Tian Yuchen
2026-08-06 16:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-06 9:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] environment: remove inaccurate repo_config_values comments Tian Yuchen
2026-08-07 8:59 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] environment: clean up repository config handling Tian Yuchen
2026-08-07 8:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] environment: drop redundant NULL checks in config getters Tian Yuchen
2026-08-07 8:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] environment: clarify repository config getter documentation Tian Yuchen
2026-08-07 8:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] environment: remove inaccurate repo_config_values comments Tian Yuchen
2026-08-07 11:04 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] environment: clean up repository config handling Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-07 21:11 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqq5x1nmc90.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=ayu.chandekar@gmail.com \
--cc=belkid98@gmail.com \
--cc=cat@malon.dev \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox