Git development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: "Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2026, #06)
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 10:46:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqq7bjbosj6.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <athRc1-tSEVgBupp@pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Wed, 21 Oct 2026 07:45:23 +0200")

Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:

> diff --git a/t/t1450-fsck.sh b/t/t1450-fsck.sh
> index 16cc5d5dcb..a19bb27db7 100755
> --- a/t/t1450-fsck.sh
> +++ b/t/t1450-fsck.sh
> @@ -544,6 +544,7 @@ test_expect_success 'rev-list --verify-objects with truncated loose blob' ' 
>  		cd truncated-blob &&
>  		blob=$(test-tool genrandom one 5k | git hash-object -t blob -w --stdin) &&
>  		obj=.git/objects/$(test_oid_to_path $blob) &&
> +		chmod +w $obj &&
>  		# Truncate the loose blob such that its header can still be
>  		# parsed, but reading the object data fails mid-stream.
>
> Ah, right, that makes sense. Makes me wonder why none of our tests in CI
> hit this error. Weird.

Not just CI.  I haven't seen this fail locally, either.  Is the
breakage Torsten reports that the later step

	mv obj.tmp "$obj"

fail when $obj" is not writable?  That does not make sense to me.

> Junio, as this patch series is already in "next", do you want me to send
> a patch on top to fix it or shall I send a new version?

A separate patch on top is very much appreciated.

Thanks.

      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-21 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-16 23:02 What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2026, #06) Junio C Hamano
2026-10-20 18:51 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2026-10-21  5:45   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-10-21 17:46     ` Junio C Hamano [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=xmqq7bjbosj6.fsf@gitster.g \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=tboegi@web.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox