* [BUG] rebase --onto doesn't abort properly
@ 2014-01-06 17:42 Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-06 18:44 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ramkumar Ramachandra @ 2014-01-06 17:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Git List
Hi,
On the latest git, I noticed that a rebase --onto doesn't abort
properly. Steps to reproduce:
# on some topic branch
$ git rebase --onto master @~10
^C # quickly!
$ git rebase --abort
# HEAD is still detached
I tried going back a few revisions, and the bug seems to be very old;
I'm surprised I didn't notice it earlier.
Are others able to reproduce this?
Thanks.
Ram
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [BUG] rebase --onto doesn't abort properly
2014-01-06 17:42 [BUG] rebase --onto doesn't abort properly Ramkumar Ramachandra
@ 2014-01-06 18:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-06 18:55 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2014-01-06 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ramkumar Ramachandra; +Cc: Git List
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On the latest git, I noticed that a rebase --onto doesn't abort
> properly. Steps to reproduce:
>
> # on some topic branch
> $ git rebase --onto master @~10
> ^C # quickly!
> $ git rebase --abort
> # HEAD is still detached
I do not think --abort was designed to abort an uncontrolled stop
like ^C in the first place. To allow that kind of "recovery", you
need to teach "rebase" to first record the state you would want to
go back to before doing anything, but then what happens if the ^C
comes when you are still in the middle of doing so?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [BUG] rebase --onto doesn't abort properly
2014-01-06 18:44 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2014-01-06 18:55 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ramkumar Ramachandra @ 2014-01-06 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Git List
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I do not think --abort was designed to abort an uncontrolled stop
> like ^C in the first place.
Why not? All it requires is a reset --hard to
.git/rebase-apply/head-name, as usual, no?
> To allow that kind of "recovery", you
> need to teach "rebase" to first record the state you would want to
> go back to before doing anything, but then what happens if the ^C
> comes when you are still in the middle of doing so?
I'm a bit puzzled: doesn't rebase write_basic_state() as soon as it
starts? It's true that we can't recover from a ^C before that, but I
would expect to be able to recover after a ^C somewhere in the middle.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-01-06 18:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-01-06 17:42 [BUG] rebase --onto doesn't abort properly Ramkumar Ramachandra
2014-01-06 18:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-01-06 18:55 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox