From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>,
"Konstantin Ryabitsev" <mricon@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] sequencer: do not record dropped commits as rewritten
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:57:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqpl17rec3.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1782833268.git.phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> (Phillip Wood's message of "Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:28:50 +0100")
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com> writes:
> On 19/06/2026 11:13, Phillip Wood wrote:
>> I'm happy to take this forward and try and fix at least some of the
>> other bugs I've listed above. Uwe - if I don't cc you on some patches
>> within the next couple of weeks please feel free to send a reminder.
>
> Here is the first batch that fixes the same problem as Uwe's patch. I've
> taken a slightly different approach that uses the return value from
> do_pick_commit() to signal that a commit was dropped rather than
> adding another function argument. That involves a number of preparatory
> patches, but they are hopefully reasonably small and easy to follow.
>
> If a commit gets dropped because its changes are already upstream
> then we should not record it as rewritten. As well as confusing any
> post-rewrite hooks this means we end up copying the notes from the
> dropped commit to the commit that was picked immediately before the
> one that was dropped.
>
> This series is structured as follows:
>
> Patch 1 restores some test coverage that was lost when the default
> rebase backend was changed.
>
> Patch 2 moves a function so it can be called without a forward
> declaration in Patch 11.
>
> Patches 3 & 4 fix the return value of do_pick_commit() when an external
> command fails (this is in preparation for patch 10).
>
> Patches 5-9 try and simplify the control flow in pick_one_commit()
> in preparation for patch 10.
>
> Patch 10 changes the return type of do_pick_commit() to an enum.
>
> Patch 11 adds a new member to the enum from patch 10 for commits that
> are dropped when they become empty and uses that to stop them from
> being recorded as rewritten.
>
> Base-Commit: 6c3d7b73556db708feb3b16232fab1efc4353428
> Published-As: https://github.com/phillipwood/git/releases/tag/pw%2Frebase-drop-notes-with-commit%2Fv1
> View-Changes-At: https://github.com/phillipwood/git/compare/6c3d7b735...26551f268
> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/phillipwood/git pw/rebase-drop-notes-with-commit/v1
Thanks.
A tangent (I Cc'ed Konstantin for this), but
$ b4 am -o- '<cover.1782833268.git.phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>' >b4am.mbx
failed to produce a usable mailbox. It somehow did not think [2/11]
existed. I manually examined the References and In-Reply-To headers
of that particular message and compared them with those from other
messages but did not find anything suspicious X-<.
I have a bunch of typofixes queued on top of these 11 patches (made
with "git commit --fixup reword:<sha1>"); please double check when
you reroll after seeing more substantial reviews than mere typofixes,
possibly from others.
Thanks.
Here is the transcript of failed b4 am invocation.
---- >8 ----
Looking up https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1782833268.git.phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk/
Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1782833268.git.phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk/t.mbox.gz
Analyzing 17 messages in the thread
WARNING: duplicate messages found at index 1
Subject 1: sequencer: Skip copying notes for commits that disappear during rebase
Subject 2: t3400: restore coverage for note copying with apply backend
2 is not a reply... assume additional patch
Looking for additional code-review trailers on lore.kernel.org
Analyzing 0 code-review messages
Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
---
✗ [PATCH] sequencer: Skip copying notes for commits that disappear during rebase
✗ No key: openpgp/u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com
✗ BADSIG: DKIM/baylibre.com
✓ [PATCH 1/11] t3400: restore coverage for note copying with apply backend
✓ Signed: DKIM/gmail.com
✓ [PATCH 3/11] sequencer: be more careful with external merge
✓ Signed: DKIM/gmail.com
✓ [PATCH 4/11] sequencer: never reschedule on failed commit
✓ Signed: DKIM/gmail.com
✓ [PATCH 5/11] sequencer: remove unnecessary "or" in pick_one_commit()
✓ Signed: DKIM/gmail.com
✓ [PATCH 6/11] sequencer: simplify handing of fixup with conflicts
✓ Signed: DKIM/gmail.com
✓ [PATCH 7/11] sequencer: remove unnecessary condition in pick_one_commit()
✓ Signed: DKIM/gmail.com
✓ [PATCH 8/11] sequencer: simplify pick_one_commit()
✓ Signed: DKIM/gmail.com
✓ [PATCH 9/11] sequencer: return early from pick_one_commit() on success
✓ Signed: DKIM/gmail.com
✓ [PATCH 10/11] sequencer: use an enum to represent result of picking a commit
✓ Signed: DKIM/gmail.com
✓ [PATCH 11/11] sequencer: do not record dropped commits as rewritten
✓ Signed: DKIM/gmail.com
ERROR: missing [12/2]!
---
Total patches: 11
---
WARNING: Thread incomplete!
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/cover.1782833268.git.phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk
:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 17:40 [PATCH] sequencer: Skip copying notes for commits that disappear during rebase Uwe Kleine-König
2026-06-17 13:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-06-17 13:58 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-06-19 10:13 ` Phillip Wood
2026-06-19 13:01 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-06-30 15:28 ` [PATCH 00/11] sequencer: do not record dropped commits as rewritten Phillip Wood
2026-06-30 15:28 ` [PATCH 01/11] t3400: restore coverage for note copying with apply backend Phillip Wood
2026-06-30 15:28 ` [PATCH 02/11] sequencer: move definition of is_final_fixup() Phillip Wood
2026-06-30 15:28 ` [PATCH 03/11] sequencer: be more careful with external merge Phillip Wood
2026-06-30 15:28 ` [PATCH 04/11] sequencer: never reschedule on failed commit Phillip Wood
2026-06-30 15:28 ` [PATCH 05/11] sequencer: remove unnecessary "or" in pick_one_commit() Phillip Wood
2026-06-30 15:28 ` [PATCH 06/11] sequencer: simplify handing of fixup with conflicts Phillip Wood
2026-06-30 15:28 ` [PATCH 07/11] sequencer: remove unnecessary condition in pick_one_commit() Phillip Wood
2026-06-30 15:28 ` [PATCH 08/11] sequencer: simplify pick_one_commit() Phillip Wood
2026-07-06 11:06 ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2026-07-06 13:40 ` Phillip Wood
2026-06-30 15:28 ` [PATCH 09/11] sequencer: return early from pick_one_commit() on success Phillip Wood
2026-07-06 11:08 ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2026-06-30 15:29 ` [PATCH 10/11] sequencer: use an enum to represent result of picking a commit Phillip Wood
2026-07-06 11:12 ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2026-07-06 13:39 ` Phillip Wood
2026-06-30 15:29 ` [PATCH 11/11] sequencer: do not record dropped commits as rewritten Phillip Wood
2026-06-30 19:57 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2026-07-01 6:00 ` [PATCH 00/11] " Uwe Kleine-König
2026-07-01 13:29 ` Phillip Wood
2026-07-01 13:31 ` Phillip Wood
2026-07-01 9:38 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-07-01 13:37 ` Phillip Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqpl17rec3.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mricon@kernel.org \
--cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox