* [PATCH] Command-line format clarification
@ 2010-01-14 15:38 Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko @ 2010-01-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: The development of GRUB 2
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1029 bytes --]
There is some amount of confusion regarding command line format. I
propose following clarification:
=== modified file 'doc/multiboot.texi'
--- doc/multiboot.texi 2010-01-12 16:49:46 +0000
+++ doc/multiboot.texi 2010-01-14 15:36:23 +0000
@@ -707,7 +707,11 @@
If bit 2 of the @samp{flags} longword is set, the @samp{cmdline} field
is valid, and contains the physical address of the command line to
be passed to the kernel. The command line is a normal C-style
-zero-terminated string.
+zero-terminated string. The exact format of command line is left to
+OS developpers. General-purpose boot loaders should allow user a complete
+control on command line independently of other factors like image name.
+Boot loaders with specific payload in mind may completely or partially
generate
+it algorithmically.
If bit 3 of the @samp{flags} is set, then the @samp{mods} fields
indicate to the kernel what boot modules were loaded along with the
--
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 293 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2010-01-14 15:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-14 15:38 [PATCH] Command-line format clarification Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox