From: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
To: "igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/frontbuffer_tracking: Do not assert FBC state after a page flip changing stride
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 19:46:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0c028d738deadaa8fca6506738870547e07bd96b.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <005633a0c49a33e66edd4d823f63828917cd565f.camel@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2802 bytes --]
On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 11:49 -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-03-28 at 15:28 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > When the stridechange subtest was introduced f23ea58f1fbb
> > ("kms_frontbuffer_tracking: expand badstride and stridechange")
> > atomic was not around and change the stride using drmModePageFlip()
> > was not allowed so it was expected that it would return -EINVAL and
> > kernel would keep the old framebuffer with the smaller plane that
> > is
> > know to fit on CFB(if it don't fit the test will skip on the first
> > full-modeset because "not enough stolen memory" is set).
> >
> > But after the introduction of atomic the subtest was updated by
> > f63e070b469d ("kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Fix tests with the new
> > atomic reality.") to accept a no error return from
> > drmModePageFlip()
> > but the do_assertions() that follows it was not updated.
> > As the subtest function comment states, kernel will do fastsets in
> > this scenario and the allocated CFB could not be enough to keep FBC
> > enabled over the new framebuffer, so here adding the missing
> > DONT_ASSERT_FEATURE_STATUS to ignore the FBC state and just test if
> > CRC match and if kernel do not misbehave.
> >
> > Other way to solve this issue would be make the kernel do a
> > full-modeset when CFB is not enough for the new plane so FBC is
> > disabled with the CRC freeing the actual CFB and then after enable
> > CRTC again it will try to enable FBC again if it can allocate the
> > required CFB but by the subtest comment this is not intended.
> >
> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105683
> > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> > ---
> > tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > index 4d15ce1c..087fc473 100644
> > --- a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > +++ b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > @@ -2950,7 +2950,7 @@ static void stridechange_subtest(const struct
> > test_mode
> > *t)
> > */
> > rc = drmModePageFlip(drm.fd, drm.display.pipes[params-
> > >pipe].crtc_id,
> > new_fb->fb_id, 0, NULL);
> > igt_assert(rc == -EINVAL || rc == 0);
> > - do_assertions(0);
> > + do_assertions(DONT_ASSERT_FEATURE_STATUS);
> The assertion is still valid if the page flip ioctl failed, isn't it?
Huum yeah, I guess non-atomic drivers would also return a error before
changing the hardware state.
So change to:
do_assertions(rc ? 0 : DONT_ASSERT_FEATURE_STATUS);
>
> -DK
>
> > }
> >
> > /**
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 153 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-02 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-28 22:28 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/frontbuffer_tracking: Do not assert FBC state after a page flip changing stride José Roberto de Souza
2019-03-28 22:28 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/frontbuffer_tracking: Assert the status of other features on stridechange subtest José Roberto de Souza
2019-04-02 19:26 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2019-04-02 19:47 ` Souza, Jose
2019-03-28 23:28 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [i-g-t,1/2] tests/frontbuffer_tracking: Do not assert FBC state after a page flip changing stride Patchwork
2019-03-29 8:59 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-04-02 18:49 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] " Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2019-04-02 19:46 ` Souza, Jose [this message]
2019-04-02 20:23 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0c028d738deadaa8fca6506738870547e07bd96b.camel@intel.com \
--to=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox