public inbox for igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
To: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>,
	"igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/frontbuffer_tracking: Do not assert FBC state after a page flip changing stride
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 13:23:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <439d78690d4f136b09b5ab725263e5b090e407b3.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0c028d738deadaa8fca6506738870547e07bd96b.camel@intel.com>

On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 12:46 -0700, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 11:49 -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2019-03-28 at 15:28 -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > > When the stridechange subtest was introduced f23ea58f1fbb
> > > ("kms_frontbuffer_tracking: expand badstride and stridechange")
> > > atomic was not around and change the stride using drmModePageFlip()
> > > was not allowed so it was expected that it would return -EINVAL and
> > > kernel would keep the old framebuffer with the smaller plane that
> > > is
> > > know to fit on CFB(if it don't fit the test will skip on the first
> > > full-modeset because "not enough stolen memory" is set).
> > > 
> > > But after the introduction of atomic the subtest was updated by
> > > f63e070b469d ("kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Fix tests with the new
> > > atomic reality.") to accept a no error return from
> > > drmModePageFlip()
> > > but the do_assertions() that follows it was not updated.
> > > As the subtest function comment states, kernel will do fastsets in
> > > this scenario and the allocated CFB could not be enough to keep FBC
> > > enabled over the new framebuffer, so here adding the missing
> > > DONT_ASSERT_FEATURE_STATUS to ignore the FBC state and just test if
> > > CRC match and if kernel do not misbehave.
> > > 
> > > Other way to solve this issue would be make the kernel do a
> > > full-modeset when CFB is not enough for the new plane so FBC is
> > > disabled with the CRC freeing the actual CFB and then after enable
> > > CRTC again it will try to enable FBC again if it can allocate the
> > > required CFB but by the subtest comment this is not intended.
> > > 
> > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105683
> > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > > b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > > index 4d15ce1c..087fc473 100644
> > > --- a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > > +++ b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > > @@ -2950,7 +2950,7 @@ static void stridechange_subtest(const struct
> > > test_mode
> > > *t)
> > >  	 */
> > >  	rc = drmModePageFlip(drm.fd, drm.display.pipes[params-
> > > > pipe].crtc_id,
> > > 
> > > new_fb->fb_id, 0, NULL);
> > >  	igt_assert(rc == -EINVAL || rc == 0);
> > > -	do_assertions(0);
> > > +	do_assertions(DONT_ASSERT_FEATURE_STATUS);
> > 
> > The assertion is still valid if the page flip ioctl failed, isn't it?
> 
> Huum yeah, I guess non-atomic drivers would also return a error before
> changing the hardware state.
> 
> So change to:
> 
> do_assertions(rc ? 0 : DONT_ASSERT_FEATURE_STATUS);
> 
Yeah, that should work.

-DK
> 
> > 
> > -DK
> > 
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  /**

_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev

      reply	other threads:[~2019-04-02 20:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-28 22:28 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/frontbuffer_tracking: Do not assert FBC state after a page flip changing stride José Roberto de Souza
2019-03-28 22:28 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/frontbuffer_tracking: Assert the status of other features on stridechange subtest José Roberto de Souza
2019-04-02 19:26   ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2019-04-02 19:47     ` Souza, Jose
2019-03-28 23:28 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [i-g-t,1/2] tests/frontbuffer_tracking: Do not assert FBC state after a page flip changing stride Patchwork
2019-03-29  8:59 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-04-02 18:49 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] " Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2019-04-02 19:46   ` Souza, Jose
2019-04-02 20:23     ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=439d78690d4f136b09b5ab725263e5b090e407b3.camel@intel.com \
    --to=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox