From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>, igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tests/intel/xe_vm: Always have at least 2 pages bound in hammer sections
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:42:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <165db5d9-b43a-45dc-bb66-4fc6436fb648@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240410012148.409170-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>
On 10/04/2024 02:21, Matthew Brost wrote:
> If the prefetch buffer is 2k or larger the hammer sections will prefetch
> the next page, if the page is unbound a fault will occur. Account for
> larger prefetchs by always having at least 2 pages bound for the hammer
> thread.
Is this referring to bb_start pre-fetch? It should be + 4K at most for
xe2. Is it possible to make the test consider xe_cs_prefetch_size()
somehow instead of hardcoding? Or perhaps that is tricky here? Otherwise
maybe we can add an assert that xe_cs_prefetch_size() remains <= 4K for
this test, with comment explaining what needs to change if we start
triggering the assert? Thinking is that would be easier to debug and fix
than seeing CAT errors, faults etc. if the pre-fetch changes again.
>
> v2:
> - Missed table entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_vm.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_vm.c b/tests/intel/xe_vm.c
> index bd4973cc38..9f9f61b7ef 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_vm.c
> @@ -1843,12 +1843,12 @@ igt_main
> { "all", 4, 2, 0, 4, 0 },
> { "one-partial", 4, 1, 1, 2, 0 },
> { "either-side-partial", 4, 2, 1, 2, 0 },
> - { "either-side-partial-hammer", 4, 2, 1, 2,
> + { "either-side-partial-hammer", 6, 2, 2, 2,
> MAP_FLAG_HAMMER_FIRST_PAGE },
> - { "either-side-partial-split-page-hammer", 4, 2, 1, 2,
> + { "either-side-partial-split-page-hammer", 6, 2, 2, 2,
> MAP_FLAG_HAMMER_FIRST_PAGE |
> MAP_FLAG_LARGE_PAGE },
> - { "either-side-partial-large-page-hammer", 4, 2, 1, 2,
> + { "either-side-partial-large-page-hammer", 6, 2, 2, 2,
> MAP_FLAG_HAMMER_FIRST_PAGE |
> MAP_FLAG_LARGE_PAGE |
> MAP_FLAG_LARGE_PAGE_NO_SPLIT },
> @@ -1857,7 +1857,7 @@ igt_main
> { "front", 4, 2, 1, 3, 0 },
> { "many-all", 4 * 8, 2 * 8, 0 * 8, 4 * 8, 0 },
> { "many-either-side-partial", 4 * 8, 2 * 8, 1, 4 * 8 - 2, 0 },
> - { "many-either-side-partial-hammer", 4 * 8, 2 * 8, 1, 4 * 8 - 2,
> + { "many-either-side-partial-hammer", 4 * 8, 2 * 8, 2, 4 * 8 - 4,
> MAP_FLAG_HAMMER_FIRST_PAGE },
> { "many-either-side-full", 4 * 8, 4 * 8, 1 * 8, 2 * 8, 0 },
> { "many-end", 4 * 8, 4, 0 * 8, 3 * 8 + 2, 0 },
> @@ -1902,12 +1902,12 @@ igt_main
> { "one-partial", 4, 1, 1, 2, 0 },
> { "either-side-partial", 4, 2, 1, 2, 0 },
> { "either-side-full", 4, 4, 1, 2, 0 },
> - { "either-side-partial-hammer", 4, 2, 1, 2,
> + { "either-side-partial-hammer", 6, 2, 2, 2,
> MAP_FLAG_HAMMER_FIRST_PAGE },
> - { "either-side-partial-split-page-hammer", 4, 2, 1, 2,
> + { "either-side-partial-split-page-hammer", 6, 2, 2, 2,
> MAP_FLAG_HAMMER_FIRST_PAGE |
> MAP_FLAG_LARGE_PAGE },
> - { "either-side-partial-large-page-hammer", 4, 2, 1, 2,
> + { "either-side-partial-large-page-hammer", 6, 2, 2, 2,
> MAP_FLAG_HAMMER_FIRST_PAGE |
> MAP_FLAG_LARGE_PAGE |
> MAP_FLAG_LARGE_PAGE_NO_SPLIT },
> @@ -1915,7 +1915,7 @@ igt_main
> { "front", 4, 2, 1, 3, 0 },
> { "many-all", 4 * 8, 2 * 8, 0 * 8, 4 * 8, 0 },
> { "many-either-side-partial", 4 * 8, 2 * 8, 1, 4 * 8 - 2, 0 },
> - { "many-either-side-partial-hammer", 4 * 8, 2 * 8, 1, 4 * 8 - 2,
> + { "many-either-side-partial-hammer", 4 * 8, 2 * 8, 2, 4 * 8 - 4,
> MAP_FLAG_HAMMER_FIRST_PAGE },
> { "userptr-all", 4, 2, 0, 4, MAP_FLAG_USERPTR },
> { "userptr-one-partial", 4, 1, 1, 2, MAP_FLAG_USERPTR },
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-10 8:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-10 1:21 [PATCH v2] tests/intel/xe_vm: Always have at least 2 pages bound in hammer sections Matthew Brost
2024-04-10 1:59 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success for tests/intel/xe_vm: Always have at least 2 pages bound in hammer sections (rev2) Patchwork
2024-04-10 2:25 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-04-10 8:42 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2024-04-12 1:58 ` [PATCH v2] tests/intel/xe_vm: Always have at least 2 pages bound in hammer sections Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=165db5d9-b43a-45dc-bb66-4fc6436fb648@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox