Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Isabella Basso" <isabbasso@riseup.net>,
	"Dominik Karol Piątkowski" <dominik.karol.piatkowski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t v2 13/17] lib/ktap: Reimplement KTAP parser
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 15:35:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1795725.3VsfAaAtOV@jkrzyszt-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23874386.ouqheUzb2q@jkrzyszt-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Friday, 15 September 2023 15:09:58 CEST Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
> 
> On Friday, 15 September 2023 14:28:49 CEST Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > On Fri,  8 Sep 2023 14:32:47 +0200
> > Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Forgot to mention on my past review:
> > 
> > > +				       &n, &len) == 1 && len == 
strlen(buf))) {
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * TODO: drop the following workaround as soon as
> > > +		 * kernel side issue of missing lines with top level
> > > +		 * KTAP version and test suite plan is fixed.
> > > +		 */
> > 
> > Please add a link to lore with the thread discussing the issue upstream,
> > as it can be helpful while this workaround is here.
> > 
> > Also, I would place the workaround on a separate patch, to make
> > easier to revert it when upstream fixes it.
> 
> Thanks for pointing that out.  Since we already have those kernel changes 
> included in v6.6-rc1, then in drm-tip, I'll drop the workaround now.

Or would you like, Mauro, to keep the workaround for CI testing of linux-xe 
not yet updated to v6.6-rc1?

Thanks,
Janusz

> 
> Thanks,
> Janusz
> 






  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-15 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-08 12:32 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 00/17] Fix IGT Kunit implementation issues Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-08 12:32 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 01/17] lib/kunit: Drop unused file stream Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-15 10:36   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-09-08 12:32 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 02/17] lib/kunit: Stop loading kunit module explicitly Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-15 10:36   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-09-08 12:32 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 03/17] lib/kunit: Fix struct kmod_module kunit_kmod not freed Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-08 12:32 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 04/17] lib/kunit: Optimize calls to igt_success/skip/fail() Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-11  8:49   ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-09-08 12:32 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 05/17] lib/kunit: Fix illegal igt_fail() calls inside subtest body Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-11  8:52   ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-09-11  9:28     ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-11 11:57       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-09-13 13:03         ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-15  9:58     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-09-15 10:08       ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-15 12:13         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-09-08 12:32 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 06/17] lib/ktap: Make sure we fail on premature cancel Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-11  8:55   ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-09-08 12:32 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 07/17] lib/ktap: Don't ignore interrupt signals Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-11  9:01   ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-09-13 14:04     ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-15 12:25       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-09-15 13:06         ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-08 12:32 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 08/17] lib/kunit: Cancel KTP parser on module load failure Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-11  9:02   ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-09-08 12:32 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 09/17] lib/ktap: Drop is_running flag Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-11  9:03   ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-09-08 12:32 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 10/17] lib/ktap: Read /dev/kmsg in blocking mode Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-15 10:42   ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-09-08 12:32 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 11/17] lib/kunit: Fail / skip on kernel taint Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-15 10:43   ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-09-08 12:32 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 12/17] lib/ktap: Use IGT linked lists for storing KTAP results Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-15 10:44   ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-09-08 12:32 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 13/17] lib/ktap: Reimplement KTAP parser Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-15 11:45   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-09-15 12:28   ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-09-15 13:09     ` Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-15 13:35       ` Janusz Krzysztofik [this message]
2023-09-08 12:32 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 14/17] lib/kunit: Load test modules in background Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-15 12:11   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-09-08 12:32 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 15/17] lib/kunit: Parse KTAP report from the main process thread Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-08 12:32 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 16/17] lib/kunit: Strip "_test" or "_kunit" suffix from subtest names Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-15 11:42   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2023-09-08 12:32 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2 17/17] lib/kunit: Omit suite name prefix if the same as subtest name Janusz Krzysztofik
2023-09-08 14:08 ` [igt-dev] ✗ GitLab.Pipeline: warning for Fix IGT Kunit implementation issues (rev2) Patchwork
2023-09-08 14:46 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2023-09-08 15:51 ` [igt-dev] ✓ CI.xeBAT: success " Patchwork
2023-09-11 12:26 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2023-09-11 14:57 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1795725.3VsfAaAtOV@jkrzyszt-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dominik.karol.piatkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=isabbasso@riseup.net \
    --cc=mauro.chehab@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox