From: "Nautiyal, Ankit K" <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
To: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>, <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 7/9] tests/kms_sharpness_filter: Add scaler subtests
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 14:17:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d38ea57-ef56-4604-b3f2-4ae628d0d3af@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241209114623.1843033-8-swati2.sharma@intel.com>
On 12/9/2024 5:16 PM, Swati Sharma wrote:
> Upscale/Downscale subtests are added to apply plane scaler and casf
> together.
>
> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/kms_sharpness_filter.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/kms_sharpness_filter.c b/tests/kms_sharpness_filter.c
> index 92c816480..06c9cce11 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_sharpness_filter.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_sharpness_filter.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,14 @@
> * SUBTEST: filter-suspend
> * Description: Verify content adaptive sharpness filter with suspend.
> * Functionality: casf, suspend
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: filter-scaler-upscale
> + * Description: Verify content adaptive sharpness filter with 1 plane scaler enabled.
> + * Functionality: casf, scaling
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: filter-scaler-downscale
> + * Description: Verify content adaptive sharpness filter with 1 plane scaler enabled.
It would be good to add upscale, and downscale in the description .
> + * Functionality: casf, scaling
> */
>
> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test to validate content adaptive sharpness filter");
> @@ -69,6 +77,9 @@ IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test to validate content adaptive sharpness filter");
> #define MAX_PIXELS_FOR_5_TAP_FILTER (3840 * 2160)
> #define NROUNDS 10
>
> +#define SET_PLANES ((type == TEST_FILTER_UPSCALE) \
> + || (type == TEST_FILTER_DOWNSCALE))
> +
> enum test_type {
> TEST_FILTER_BASIC,
> TEST_FILTER_MODIFIERS,
> @@ -79,6 +90,8 @@ enum test_type {
> TEST_FILTER_TAP,
> TEST_FILTER_DPMS,
> TEST_FILTER_SUSPEND,
> + TEST_FILTER_UPSCALE,
> + TEST_FILTER_DOWNSCALE,
> };
>
> const int filter_strength_list[] = {
> @@ -169,6 +182,27 @@ static void cleanup_fbs(data_t *data)
> igt_remove_fb(data->drm_fd, &data->fb[i]);
> }
>
> +static void set_planes(data_t *data, enum test_type type)
> +{
> + drmModeModeInfo *mode = data->mode;
> + igt_output_t *output = data->output;
> +
> + data->plane[1] = igt_output_get_plane(output, 1);
> + data->plane[2] = igt_output_get_plane(output, 2);
This is not used in these subtests.
Regards,
Ankit
> +
> + if (type == TEST_FILTER_UPSCALE) {
> + setup_fb(data->drm_fd, 20, 20, data->format, data->modifier, &data->fb[1]);
> + igt_plane_set_fb(data->plane[1], &data->fb[1]);
> + igt_plane_set_size(data->plane[1], mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay);
> + }
> +
> + if (type == TEST_FILTER_DOWNSCALE) {
> + setup_fb(data->drm_fd, mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay, data->format, data->modifier, &data->fb[1]);
> + igt_plane_set_fb(data->plane[1], &data->fb[1]);
> + igt_plane_set_size(data->plane[1], mode->hdisplay * 0.75, mode->vdisplay * 0.75);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void cleanup(data_t *data)
> {
> igt_display_reset(&data->display);
> @@ -238,6 +272,9 @@ static void test_sharpness_filter(data_t *data, enum test_type type)
> else
> igt_skip("No requested rotation on pipe %s\n", kmstest_pipe_name(data->pipe_id));
>
> + if (SET_PLANES)
> + set_planes(data, type);
> +
> set_filter_strength_on_pipe(data);
>
> if (data->filter_strength != 0)
> @@ -261,6 +298,10 @@ static void test_sharpness_filter(data_t *data, enum test_type type)
> if (type == TEST_FILTER_TOGGLE)
> ret |= test_filter_toggle(data);
>
> + if (type == TEST_FILTER_DOWNSCALE)
> + igt_skip_on_f(ret == -ERANGE || ret == -EINVAL,
> + "Scaling op not supported, cdclk limits might be exceeded.\n");
> +
> igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
>
> cleanup(data);
> @@ -354,6 +395,12 @@ run_sharpness_filter_test(data_t *data, enum test_type type)
> case TEST_FILTER_SUSPEND:
> snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "-suspend");
> break;
> + case TEST_FILTER_UPSCALE:
> + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "-upscale");
> + break;
> + case TEST_FILTER_DOWNSCALE:
> + snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "-downscale");
> + break;
> default:
> igt_assert(0);
> }
> @@ -510,6 +557,28 @@ igt_main_args("l", NULL, help_str, opt_handler, &data)
> run_sharpness_filter_test(&data, TEST_FILTER_SUSPEND);
> }
>
> + igt_describe("Verify content adaptive sharpness filter "
> + "with 1 plane scaler enabled.");
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic("filter-scaler-upscale") {
> + data.modifier = DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR;
> + data.rotation = IGT_ROTATION_0;
> + data.format = DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888;
> + data.filter_strength = MID_FILTER_STRENGTH;
> +
> + run_sharpness_filter_test(&data, TEST_FILTER_UPSCALE);
> + }
> +
> + igt_describe("Verify content adaptive sharpness filter "
> + "with 1 plane scaler enabled.");
> + igt_subtest_with_dynamic("filter-scaler-downscale") {
> + data.modifier = DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR;
> + data.rotation = IGT_ROTATION_0;
> + data.format = DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888;
> + data.filter_strength = MID_FILTER_STRENGTH;
> +
> + run_sharpness_filter_test(&data, TEST_FILTER_DOWNSCALE);
> + }
> +
> igt_fixture {
> igt_display_fini(&data.display);
> drm_close_driver(data.drm_fd);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-11 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-09 11:46 [PATCH i-g-t 0/9] Add new test to validate adaptive sharpness filter Swati Sharma
2024-12-09 11:46 ` [PATCH i-g-t, v3 1/9] lib/igt_kms: Add "sharpness strength" as crtc property Swati Sharma
2024-12-09 11:46 ` [PATCH i-g-t, v2 2/9] lib/igt_kms: Add func() to return scaling mode name string Swati Sharma
2024-12-09 11:46 ` [PATCH i-g-t, v9 3/9] tests/kms_sharpness_filter: Add adaptive sharpness basic filter tests Swati Sharma
2024-12-11 4:25 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-12-09 11:46 ` [PATCH i-g-t 4/9] tests/kms_sharpness_filter: Add toggle subtest Swati Sharma
2024-12-11 7:57 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-12-09 11:46 ` [PATCH i-g-t 5/9] tests/kms_sharpness_filter: Add filter-tap subtest Swati Sharma
2024-12-11 8:36 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-12-09 11:46 ` [PATCH i-g-t 6/9] tests/kms_sharpness_filter: Add dpms/suspend subtests Swati Sharma
2024-12-11 10:59 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-12-09 11:46 ` [PATCH i-g-t 7/9] tests/kms_sharpness_filter: Add scaler subtests Swati Sharma
2024-12-11 8:47 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K [this message]
2024-12-09 11:46 ` [PATCH i-g-t 8/9] tests/kms_sharpness_filter: Add invalid subtests Swati Sharma
2024-12-11 10:55 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-12-09 11:46 ` [PATCH i-g-t, v2 9/9] tests/chamelium/kms_chamelium_sharpness_filter: Add basic test Swati Sharma
2024-12-17 10:32 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2024-12-09 21:18 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for Add new test to validate adaptive sharpness filter (rev10) Patchwork
2024-12-09 21:28 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2024-12-09 22:33 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2024-12-09 23:50 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-12-04 8:26 [PATCH i-g-t,v9 0/9] Add new test to validate adaptive sharpness Swati Sharma
2024-12-04 8:26 ` [PATCH i-g-t 7/9] tests/kms_sharpness_filter: Add scaler subtests Swati Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1d38ea57-ef56-4604-b3f2-4ae628d0d3af@intel.com \
--to=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=swati2.sharma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox