From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Subject: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] tests/perf_pmu: Tighten busy measurement
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 12:47:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180201124746.10641-2-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180201124746.10641-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
In cases where we manually terminate the busy batch, we always want to
sample busyness while the batch is running, just before we will
terminate it, and not the other way around. This way we make the window
for unwated idleness getting sampled smaller.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
tests/perf_pmu.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
index 2f7d33414a53..bf16e5e8b1f9 100644
--- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
@@ -146,10 +146,9 @@ single(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, bool busy)
spin = NULL;
slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
- igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
-
val = pmu_read_single(fd);
+ igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin);
close(fd);
@@ -256,7 +255,7 @@ busy_double_start(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd);
}
-static void log_busy(int fd, unsigned int num_engines, uint64_t *val)
+static void log_busy(unsigned int num_engines, uint64_t *val)
{
char buf[1024];
int rem = sizeof(buf);
@@ -303,14 +302,14 @@ busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0, e2ring(gem_fd, e), 0);
slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
- igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
-
pmu_read_multi(fd[0], num_engines, val);
- log_busy(fd[0], num_engines, val);
+ igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin);
close(fd[0]);
+ log_busy(num_engines, val);
+
assert_within_epsilon(val[busy_idx], slept, tolerance);
for (i = 0; i < num_engines; i++) {
if (i == busy_idx)
@@ -364,14 +363,14 @@ most_busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e,
fd[i] = open_group(val[i], fd[0]);
slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
- igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
-
pmu_read_multi(fd[0], num_engines, val);
- log_busy(fd[0], num_engines, val);
+ igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin);
close(fd[0]);
+ log_busy(num_engines, val);
+
for (i = 0; i < num_engines; i++) {
if (i == idle_idx)
assert_within_epsilon(val[i], 0.0f, tolerance);
@@ -420,14 +419,14 @@ all_busy_check_all(int gem_fd, const unsigned int num_engines)
fd[i] = open_group(val[i], fd[0]);
slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
- igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
-
pmu_read_multi(fd[0], num_engines, val);
- log_busy(fd[0], num_engines, val);
+ igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin);
close(fd[0]);
+ log_busy(num_engines, val);
+
for (i = 0; i < num_engines; i++)
assert_within_epsilon(val[i], slept, tolerance);
gem_quiescent_gpu(gem_fd);
@@ -903,12 +902,11 @@ static void cpu_hotplug(int gem_fd)
igt_waitchildren();
- igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
- gem_sync(gem_fd, spin->handle);
-
ref = igt_nsec_elapsed(&start);
val = pmu_read_single(fd);
+ igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
+ gem_sync(gem_fd, spin->handle);
igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin);
close(fd);
--
2.14.1
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-01 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-01 12:47 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] perf_pmu reliability improvements Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-01 12:47 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2018-02-01 12:57 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] tests/perf_pmu: Tighten busy measurement Chris Wilson
2018-02-01 16:26 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-01 16:39 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-01 16:58 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-01 17:08 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-01 17:16 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-01 17:34 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-01 17:20 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-01 12:47 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] tests/perf_pmu: More busy measurement tightening Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-01 12:59 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-01 16:37 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-01 16:48 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-01 17:02 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-01 12:47 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] tests/perf_pmu: Use measured sleep in all time based tests Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-01 17:37 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-01 13:22 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for perf_pmu reliability improvements Patchwork
2018-02-01 16:38 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180201124746.10641-2-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--to=tursulin@ursulin.net \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox