From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@ursulin.net>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Subject: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] tests/perf_pmu: Use measured sleep in all time based tests
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 12:47:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180201124746.10641-4-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180201124746.10641-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Stop relying on timers to end spin batches but use measured sleep, which
was established to work better, in all time based tests.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
---
tests/perf_pmu.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/perf_pmu.c b/tests/perf_pmu.c
index bdf452c8347c..e27e74abe686 100644
--- a/tests/perf_pmu.c
+++ b/tests/perf_pmu.c
@@ -454,30 +454,31 @@ static void
no_sema(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e, bool busy)
{
igt_spin_t *spin;
- uint64_t val[2];
+ uint64_t val[2][2];
int fd;
fd = open_group(I915_PMU_ENGINE_SEMA(e->class, e->instance), -1);
open_group(I915_PMU_ENGINE_WAIT(e->class, e->instance), fd);
- if (busy) {
+ if (busy)
spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0, e2ring(gem_fd, e), 0);
- igt_spin_batch_set_timeout(spin, batch_duration_ns);
- } else {
- usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
- }
- if (busy)
- gem_sync(gem_fd, spin->handle);
+ pmu_read_multi(fd, 2, val[0]);
+ measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
+ pmu_read_multi(fd, 2, val[1]);
- pmu_read_multi(fd, 2, val);
+ val[0][0] = val[1][0] - val[0][0];
+ val[0][1] = val[1][1] - val[0][1];
- if (busy)
+ if (busy) {
+ igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
+ gem_sync(gem_fd, spin->handle);
igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin);
+ }
close(fd);
- assert_within_epsilon(val[0], 0.0f, tolerance);
- assert_within_epsilon(val[1], 0.0f, tolerance);
+ assert_within_epsilon(val[0][0], 0.0f, tolerance);
+ assert_within_epsilon(val[0][1], 0.0f, tolerance);
}
#define MI_INSTR(opcode, flags) (((opcode) << 23) | (flags))
@@ -766,7 +767,7 @@ static void
multi_client(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
{
uint64_t config = I915_PMU_ENGINE_BUSY(e->class, e->instance);
- unsigned int slept;
+ unsigned int slept[2];
igt_spin_t *spin;
uint64_t val[2];
int fd[2];
@@ -781,23 +782,22 @@ multi_client(int gem_fd, const struct intel_execution_engine2 *e)
fd[1] = open_pmu(config);
spin = igt_spin_batch_new(gem_fd, 0, e2ring(gem_fd, e), 0);
- igt_spin_batch_set_timeout(spin, 2 * batch_duration_ns);
- val[0] = pmu_read_single(fd[0]);
- val[1] = pmu_read_single(fd[1]);
- slept = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
+ val[0] = val[1] = pmu_read_single(fd[0]);
+ slept[1] = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000);
val[1] = pmu_read_single(fd[1]) - val[1];
close(fd[1]);
- gem_sync(gem_fd, spin->handle);
-
+ slept[0] = measured_usleep(batch_duration_ns / 1000) + slept[1];
val[0] = pmu_read_single(fd[0]) - val[0];
+ igt_spin_batch_end(spin);
+ gem_sync(gem_fd, spin->handle);
igt_spin_batch_free(gem_fd, spin);
close(fd[0]);
- assert_within_epsilon(val[0], 2 * batch_duration_ns, tolerance);
- assert_within_epsilon(val[1], slept, tolerance);
+ assert_within_epsilon(val[0], slept[0], tolerance);
+ assert_within_epsilon(val[1], slept[1], tolerance);
}
/**
--
2.14.1
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-01 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-01 12:47 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] perf_pmu reliability improvements Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-01 12:47 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/3] tests/perf_pmu: Tighten busy measurement Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-01 12:57 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-01 16:26 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-01 16:39 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-01 16:58 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-01 17:08 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-01 17:16 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-01 17:34 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-01 17:20 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-01 12:47 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/3] tests/perf_pmu: More busy measurement tightening Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-01 12:59 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-01 16:37 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-01 16:48 ` Chris Wilson
2018-02-01 17:02 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-02-01 12:47 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2018-02-01 17:37 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 3/3] tests/perf_pmu: Use measured sleep in all time based tests Chris Wilson
2018-02-01 13:22 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for perf_pmu reliability improvements Patchwork
2018-02-01 16:38 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180201124746.10641-4-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--to=tursulin@ursulin.net \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox