Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/6] lib/igt_vmwgfx: Add vmwgfx device

From: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: thellstrom@vmware.com, syeh@vmware.com,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-graphics-maintainer@vmware.com,
	Deepak Rawat <drawat@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/6] lib/igt_vmwgfx: Add vmwgfx device
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 12:11:23 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181011091123.GN17124@platvala-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181011090148.GB31561@phenom.ffwll.local>

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 11:01:48AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 05:20:59PM -0700, Deepak Rawat wrote:
> > Add DRIVER_VMWGFX to represent vmwgfx device for running igt tests.
> > 
> > v2: Don't remove second virtio_gpu
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Deepak Rawat <drawat@vmware.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/drmtest.c | 8 ++++++++
> >  lib/drmtest.h | 3 +++
> >  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/drmtest.c b/lib/drmtest.c
> > index fee9d33a..9d013a00 100644
> > --- a/lib/drmtest.c
> > +++ b/lib/drmtest.c
> > @@ -105,6 +105,11 @@ bool is_i915_device(int fd)
> >  	return __is_device(fd, "i915");
> >  }
> >  
> > +bool is_vmwgfx_device(int fd)
> > +{
> > +	return __is_device(fd, "vmwg");
> > +}
> > +
> >  static bool has_known_intel_chipset(int fd)
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_i915_getparam gp;
> > @@ -206,6 +211,7 @@ static const struct module {
> >  	{ DRIVER_VGEM, "vgem" },
> >  	{ DRIVER_VIRTIO, "virtio-gpu" },
> >  	{ DRIVER_VIRTIO, "virtio_gpu" },
> > +	{ DRIVER_VMWGFX, "vmwgfx" },
> >  	{}
> >  };
> >  
> > @@ -348,6 +354,8 @@ static const char *chipset_to_str(int chipset)
> >  		return "virtio";
> >  	case DRIVER_AMDGPU:
> >  		return "amdgpu";
> > +	case DRIVER_VMWGFX:
> > +		return "vmwgfx";
> >  	case DRIVER_ANY:
> >  		return "any";
> >  	default:
> > diff --git a/lib/drmtest.h b/lib/drmtest.h
> > index 949865ee..0213fb51 100644
> > --- a/lib/drmtest.h
> > +++ b/lib/drmtest.h
> > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
> >  #define DRIVER_VGEM	(1 << 2)
> >  #define DRIVER_VIRTIO	(1 << 3)
> >  #define DRIVER_AMDGPU	(1 << 4)
> > +#define DRIVER_VMWGFX	(1 << 5)
> 
> This seems not needed? For pure generic kms tests I think it'd be great if
> we don't have to sprinkle driver-specific checks all over. Which you seem
> to achive in your series here.
> 
> So not clear why this here is needed?

Loading the .ko needs the name in this array:

> > @@ -206,6 +211,7 @@ static const struct module {
> >  	{ DRIVER_VGEM, "vgem" },
> >  	{ DRIVER_VIRTIO, "virtio-gpu" },
> >  	{ DRIVER_VIRTIO, "virtio_gpu" },
> > +	{ DRIVER_VMWGFX, "vmwgfx" },

-- 
Petri Latvala

> -Daniel
> 
> >  /*
> >   * Exclude DRVER_VGEM from DRIVER_ANY since if you run on a system
> >   * with vgem as well as a supported driver, you can end up with a
> > @@ -80,6 +81,8 @@ void igt_require_intel(int fd);
> >  
> >  bool is_i915_device(int fd);
> >  
> > +bool is_vmwgfx_device(int fd);
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * do_or_die:
> >   * @x: command
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > igt-dev mailing list
> > igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
> 
> -- 
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
> _______________________________________________
> igt-dev mailing list
> igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev