Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v3 1/2] tests/intel-ci: Add basic PSR2 tests to fast feedback test list

From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v3 1/2] tests/intel-ci: Add basic PSR2 tests to fast feedback test list
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 08:45:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190123164544.GD931@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190123120732.GL3271@phenom.ffwll.local>

On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 01:07:32PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 01:37:19PM +0200, Petri Latvala wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 05:09:49PM -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > > Lets run the same PSR1 basic tests for PSR2 to caught PSR2
> > > regressions faster.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 4 ++++
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> > > index da3c4c8e..e48cb8a5 100644
> > > --- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> > > +++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> > > @@ -227,6 +227,10 @@ igt@kms_psr@primary_page_flip
> > >  igt@kms_psr@cursor_plane_move
> > >  igt@kms_psr@sprite_plane_onoff
> > >  igt@kms_psr@primary_mmap_gtt
> > > +igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_page_flip
> > > +igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_plane_move
> > > +igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_plane_onoff
> > > +igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_mmap_gtt
> > 
> > 
> > The BAT results mail said success because these are new tests, but do
> > note that they failed. They must pass to get onto the BAT list.
> 
> Also, adding all kinds of tests to BAT to validate features doesn't scale.
> We need some way to run these tests on specific machines as part of the
> follow-up shard runs ... Otherwise we're stuck with a huge pressure to add
> all kinds of super-important-feature-right-now things to BAT.

I understand and I agree with your point. But on this very specific case
no shard have PSR1 or PSR2 panels.

Also this shouldn't increase the test time much, because machines with PSR1 are
already running the PSR1 tests only, machines without PSR are not running
anything and machines. Only machines with PSR2 panels that are now coming from
no PSR tests to running this few PSR2 tests.

> -Daniel
> -- 
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev