From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: IGT dev <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>, Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH v13 6/9] lib/i915: add gem_engine_topology library
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 12:49:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190320102921.GA2176@intel.intel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d60fe4c-68cd-526e-eb97-cf58a1e1703f@linux.intel.com>
> > +{
> > + const char *class_names[] = { "rcs", "bcs", "vcs", "vecs" };
> > + char *__name;
> > +
> > + /* if we don't recognise the class, then we mark it as "unk" */
> > + if (name) {
> > + e2->name = name;
> > + } else {
> > + if (class >= ARRAY_SIZE(class_names))
> > + igt_assert(asprintf(&__name, "unk-%d:%d",
> > + class, instance) > 0);
> > + else
> > + igt_assert(asprintf(&__name, "%s%d",
> > + class_names[class], instance) > 0);
> > +
> > + e2->name = __name;
>
> We discussed on the IRC how names can be borrowed from the static engine
> table, which we have to keep maintaining due CI limitations anyway. That way
> all leaks are solved.
>
> So you would just replace the above with a name lookup against the static
> table and use that pointer.
Yes, this is the tax we need to pay for having counts name inside
intel_execution_engine2.
I can take the pointer from our intel_exectuion_engines2 array,
and then we wouldn't have "unk<class>:<instance>".
As I said the best thing here would be to remove the "const" and
be able to use all the string functions.
> > + } else if (cparam.size == sizeof(struct i915_context_param_engines)) {
>
> This should be "== 0" since Chris has special plans for the other.
>
> > + /* else if context doesn't have mapped engines */
> > + query_engine_list(&engine_data);
> > + map_engine_context(&engine_data, &cparam);
> > +
> > + } else {
> > + /* context has a list of mapped engines */
> > +
> > + uint8_t nengines = (cparam.size -
> > + sizeof(struct i915_context_param_engines)) /
> > + sizeof(cengine->class_instance[0]);
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < nengines - 1; i++)
>
> nengines - 1 is not right I think, just nengines.
>
> > + dup_engine(&engine_data.engines[i], NULL,
> > + cengine->class_instance[i].engine_class,
> > + cengine->class_instance[i].engine_instance,
> > + i + 1);
>
> Just "i" since index zero is not special any longer.
I was running on a messed up kernel that and was receiving weird
values :/
Andi
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-20 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-19 23:44 [igt-dev] [PATCH v13 0/9] new engine discovery interface Andi Shyti
2019-03-19 23:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v13 1/9] lib/igt_gt: remove unnecessary argument Andi Shyti
2019-03-19 23:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v13 2/9] lib: ioctl_wrappers: reach engines by index as well Andi Shyti
2019-03-20 9:14 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-19 23:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v13 3/9] lib: move gem_context_has_engine from ioctl_wrappers to gem_context Andi Shyti
2019-03-19 23:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v13 4/9] include/drm-uapi: import i915_drm.h header file Andi Shyti
2019-03-19 23:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v13 5/9] lib: igt_gt: use flags in intel_execution_engines2 Andi Shyti
2019-03-20 9:48 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-19 23:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v13 6/9] lib/i915: add gem_engine_topology library Andi Shyti
2019-03-20 9:47 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-20 10:49 ` Andi Shyti [this message]
2019-03-20 11:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-20 11:21 ` Andi Shyti
2019-03-20 9:56 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-20 10:49 ` Andi Shyti
2019-03-20 10:59 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-20 11:13 ` Andi Shyti
2019-03-20 11:18 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-20 11:35 ` Andi Shyti
2019-03-19 23:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v13 7/9] lib/igt_gt: use for_each_engine_class_instance to loop through active engines Andi Shyti
2019-03-20 10:04 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-20 10:09 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-20 10:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-20 10:40 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-19 23:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v13 8/9] tests: perf_pmu: use the flag value embedded in intel_execution_engines2 Andi Shyti
2019-03-19 23:44 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v13 9/9] tests: gem_exec_basic: add "exec-ctx" buffer execution demo test Andi Shyti
2019-03-20 0:13 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for new engine discovery interface Patchwork
2019-03-20 9:35 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190320102921.GA2176@intel.intel \
--to=andi.shyti@intel.com \
--cc=andi@etezian.org \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox