From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: IGT dev <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>, Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH v19 5/6] lib: igt_dummyload: use for_each_context_engine()
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 19:45:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190408164548.GA2556@intel.intel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bec9ae6-aaf4-4c65-b300-c51985b889b0@linux.intel.com>
Hi Tvrtko,
> > - engines[nengine++] = opts->engine;
> > + struct intel_execution_engine2 *e;
> > + int class;
> > +
> > + if (!gem_ctx_get_engine(fd, opts->engine, opts->ctx, e)) {
> > + class = e->class;
> > + } else {
> > + gem_require_ring(fd, opts->engine);
> > + class = gem_eb_to_class(opts->engine);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (opts->flags & IGT_SPIN_POLL_RUN)
> > + igt_require(gem_class_can_store_dword(fd, class));
> > +
> > + flags[nengine++] = opts->engine;
> > }
>
> Patch looks good but I'm afraid I made an oversight earlier in review when I
> asked you to move this else block in this function. I forgot that the
> differentiation between igt_spin_batch_new and __igt_spin_batch_new was that
> the latter should not do any execbuf calls apart from the spinner itself.
> Since gem_require_ring does one it could be a problem.
>
> Would you mind moving just this else block back into the main constructor?
No problem, I'll move it back.
> With that you can have:
>
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Thanks!
Andi
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-08 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-08 16:15 [igt-dev] [PATCH v19 0/6] new engine discovery interface Andi Shyti
2019-04-08 16:15 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v19 1/6] include/drm-uapi: import i915_drm.h header file Andi Shyti
2019-04-08 16:37 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-08 16:47 ` Andi Shyti
2019-04-08 16:56 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-08 18:33 ` Antonio Argenziano
2019-04-09 7:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-08 16:15 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v19 2/6] lib/i915: add gem_engine_topology library and for_each loop definition Andi Shyti
2019-04-08 16:54 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-08 18:21 ` Andi Shyti
2019-04-11 16:03 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-11 23:23 ` Andi Shyti
2019-04-08 16:15 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v19 3/6] lib: igt_gt: add eb flags to class helper Andi Shyti
2019-04-08 16:24 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-08 16:15 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v19 4/6] lib: igt_gt: make gem_engine_can_store_dword() check engine class Andi Shyti
2019-04-08 16:25 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-08 16:15 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v19 5/6] lib: igt_dummyload: use for_each_context_engine() Andi Shyti
2019-04-08 16:28 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-08 16:45 ` Andi Shyti [this message]
2019-04-11 12:26 ` [igt-dev] [RFT i-g-t 6/6] test: perf_pmu: use the gem_engine_topology library Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-11 12:32 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-04-11 12:53 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-11 13:50 ` Chris Wilson
2019-04-11 14:37 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-11 13:01 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2019-04-11 13:40 ` Chris Wilson
2019-04-11 14:55 ` Andi Shyti
2019-04-11 12:28 ` [igt-dev] [RFT i-g-t 5/6] lib: igt_dummyload: use for_each_context_engine() Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-08 16:15 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH v19 6/6] test: perf_pmu: use the gem_engine_topology library Andi Shyti
2019-04-08 16:35 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-04-08 16:56 ` Andi Shyti
2019-04-08 17:35 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for new engine discovery interface Patchwork
2019-04-11 14:54 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for new engine discovery interface (rev3) Patchwork
2019-04-11 18:11 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for new engine discovery interface (rev4) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190408164548.GA2556@intel.intel \
--to=andi.shyti@intel.com \
--cc=andi@etezian.org \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox