From: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, jyoti.r.yadav@intel.com
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v13 6/6] tests/i915/i915_pm_dc:Skip the DC6 test if BIOS has disabled PC8+
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 21:56:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190903162613.GA3490@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190903143802.GC4392@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com>
On 2019-09-03 at 17:38:02 +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 07:50:01PM +0530, Anshuman Gupta wrote:
> > As DC6 requires platform to enter PC8 package C state.
> > It make sense to skip the DC6 igt-test, if BIOS configuration
> > has disabled PC8+ package C states.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
> > ---
> > tests/i915/i915_pm_dc.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/i915/i915_pm_dc.c b/tests/i915/i915_pm_dc.c
> > index 4c7e152a..0b29599b 100644
> > --- a/tests/i915/i915_pm_dc.c
> > +++ b/tests/i915/i915_pm_dc.c
> > @@ -26,19 +26,35 @@
> > #include "igt_sysfs.h"
> > #include "igt_psr.h"
> > #include <errno.h>
> > +#include <fcntl.h>
> > #include <stdbool.h>
> > #include <stdio.h>
> > #include <string.h>
> > #include "intel_bufmgr.h"
> > #include "intel_io.h"
> > #include "limits.h"
> > +#include "igt_kmod.h"
> >
> > /* DC State Flags */
> > #define CHECK_DC5 1
> > #define CHECK_DC6 2
> >
> > +#define MSR_PKG_CST_CONFIG_CONTROL 0xE2
> > +/*
> > + * Below PKG CST limit mask and PC8 bits are meant for
> > + * HSW,BDW SKL,ICL and Goldmont Microarch and future platforms.
> > + * Refer IA S/W developers manual vol3c part3 chapter:35
> > + */
> > +#define PKG_CST_LIMIT_MASK 0xF
> > +#define PKG_CST_LIMIT_C8 0x6
> > +
> > +#define MSR_PC8_RES 0x630
> > +#define MSR_PC9_RES 0x631
> > +#define MSR_PC10_RES 0x632
> > +
> > typedef struct {
> > int drm_fd;
> > + int msr_fd;
> > int debugfs_fd;
> > uint32_t devid;
> > igt_display_t display;
> > @@ -52,6 +68,34 @@ typedef struct {
> > static bool dc_state_wait_entry(int drm_fd, int dc_flag, int prev_dc_count);
> > static void check_dc_counter(int drm_fd, int dc_flag, uint32_t prev_dc_count);
> >
> > +/* If the read fails, then the machine doesn't support PC8+ residencies. */
> > +static bool supports_pc8_plus_residencies(data_t *data)
> > +{
> > + int rc;
> > + uint64_t val;
> > + int msr_fd = data->msr_fd;
> > +
> > + rc = pread(msr_fd, &val, sizeof(uint64_t), MSR_PC8_RES);
> > + if (rc != sizeof(val))
> > + return false;
> > + rc = pread(msr_fd, &val, sizeof(uint64_t), MSR_PC9_RES);
> > + if (rc != sizeof(val))
> > + return false;
> > + rc = pread(msr_fd, &val, sizeof(uint64_t), MSR_PC10_RES);
> > + if (rc != sizeof(val))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + rc = pread(msr_fd, &val, sizeof(uint64_t), MSR_PKG_CST_CONFIG_CONTROL);
> > + if (rc != sizeof(val))
> > + return false;
> > + if ((val & PKG_CST_LIMIT_MASK) < PKG_CST_LIMIT_C8) {
> > + igt_info("PKG C-states limited below PC8 by the BIOS\n");
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return true;
> > +}
>
> I missed it last time, but this is a copy/paste from i915_pm_rpm, so
> please factor it out instead into a lib function.
msr_fd is spread pretty sparse in i915_pm_rpm, passing it to a lib function
doesn't sounds good, can we take it in a seperate patch, rather then this series?
>
> > +
> > static void setup_output(data_t *data)
> > {
> > igt_display_t *display = &data->display;
> > @@ -255,6 +299,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > igt_require(has_runtime_pm);
> > igt_require(igt_pm_dmc_loaded(data.debugfs_fd));
> > igt_display_require(&data.display, data.drm_fd);
> > + /* Make sure our Kernel supports MSR and the module is loaded */
> > + igt_require(igt_kmod_load("msr", NULL) == 0);
> > +
> > + data.msr_fd = open("/dev/cpu/0/msr", O_RDONLY);
> > + igt_assert_f(data.msr_fd >= 0,
> > + "Can't open /dev/cpu/0/msr.\n");
> > }
> >
> > igt_subtest("dc5-psr") {
> > @@ -270,6 +320,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > psr_enable(data.debugfs_fd, data.op_psr_mode);
> > igt_require_f(edp_psr_sink_support(&data),
> > "Sink does not support PSR\n");
> > + igt_require_f(supports_pc8_plus_residencies(&data),
> > + "PC8+ residencies not supported\n");
> > test_dc_state_psr(&data, CHECK_DC6);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -278,11 +330,14 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > }
> >
> > igt_subtest("dc6-dpms") {
> > + igt_require_f(supports_pc8_plus_residencies(&data),
> > + "PC8+ residencies not supported\n");
> > test_dc_state_dpms(&data, CHECK_DC6);
> > }
> >
> > igt_fixture {
> > close(data.debugfs_fd);
> > + close(data.msr_fd);
> > display_fini(&data);
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.21.0
> >
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-03 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-01 14:19 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v13 0/6] DC states igt tests patch series Anshuman Gupta
2019-09-01 14:19 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v13 1/6] lib/igt_pm: igt lib helper routines to support DC5/6 tests Anshuman Gupta
2019-09-03 14:32 ` Imre Deak
2019-09-01 14:19 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v13 3/6] tests/i915/i915_pm_dc: Added test for DC6 during PSR Anshuman Gupta
2019-09-01 14:19 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v13 4/6] tests/i915/i915_pm_dc: Added test for DC5 during DPMS Anshuman Gupta
2019-09-01 14:20 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v13 5/6] tests/i915/i915_pm_dc: Added test for DC6 " Anshuman Gupta
2019-09-01 14:20 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v13 6/6] tests/i915/i915_pm_dc:Skip the DC6 test if BIOS has disabled PC8+ Anshuman Gupta
2019-09-03 14:38 ` Imre Deak
2019-09-03 16:26 ` Anshuman Gupta [this message]
2019-09-01 14:49 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for DC states igt tests patch series (rev18) Patchwork
2019-09-01 20:28 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
[not found] ` <20190901142001.11279-3-anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
2019-09-03 14:34 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v13 2/6] tests/i915/i915_pm_dc: Added new test to verify Display C States Imre Deak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190903162613.GA3490@intel.com \
--to=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=jyoti.r.yadav@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox