From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_big_fb: Add over 32k HW stride tests
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 16:50:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190927135053.GR1208@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5317b00a-b266-3f18-a9be-3797d7d0a23d@gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 04:43:43PM +0300, Juha-Pekka Heikkila wrote:
> On 23.9.2019 15.43, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 01:40:33PM +0300, Juha-Pekka Heikkila wrote:
> >> On ICL when using 64bpp formats strides can reach up to
> >> 64k. These test try exact maximum HW strides so gtt
> >> remapping will not come in play.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> tests/kms_big_fb.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+)
> >
> > I believe all you should need is something like:
> >
> > --- a/tests/kms_big_fb.c
> > +++ b/tests/kms_big_fb.c
> > @@ -161,9 +161,6 @@ static void max_fb_size(data_t *data, int *width, int *height,
> > uint64_t size;
> > int i = 0;
> >
> > - *width = data->max_fb_width;
> > - *height = data->max_fb_height;
> > -
> > /* max fence stride is only 8k bytes on gen3 */
> > if (intel_gen(data->devid) < 4 &&
> > format == DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888)
> > @@ -415,8 +412,16 @@ static bool test_pipe(data_t *data)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -static void test_scanout(data_t *data)
> > +static void test_scanout(data_t *data, bool test_max_hw_stride)
> > {
> > + if (test_max_hw_stride) {
> > + data->big_fb_width = BIG;
> > + data->big_fb_height = BIG;
> > + } else {
> > + data->big_fb_width = data->max_fb_width;
> > + data->big_fb_height = data->max_fb_height;
> > + }
> > +
> > max_fb_size(data, &data->big_fb_width, &data->big_fb_height,
> > data->format, data->modifier);
> >
> >
>
> Doing test this way will try 'bunch of coordinates pulled out of thin
> air' (as stated in the code :) ) but my version tries the explicit
> maximum limits with idea if that works then any other coordinate would
> work as well.
The last element in the "thin air" coordinates array tests the maximum
values already.
Not that I think it matters much for this test. If the max stride value
is broken then it probably doesn't even matter what panning coordinates
we use.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-27 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-23 10:40 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] test longer than 32k strides Juha-Pekka Heikkila
2019-09-23 10:40 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_big_fb: Add over 32k HW stride tests Juha-Pekka Heikkila
2019-09-23 12:43 ` Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-27 13:43 ` Juha-Pekka Heikkila
2019-09-27 13:50 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
[not found] ` <1571904804-2248-1-git-send-email-juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
2019-10-24 13:55 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_big_fb: Add max HW stride length tests Ville Syrjälä
2019-09-23 11:41 ` [igt-dev] ✗ GitLab.Pipeline: warning for tests/kms_big_fb: Add over 32k HW stride tests Patchwork
2019-09-23 11:45 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-09-23 13:01 ` [igt-dev] ✗ GitLab.Pipeline: warning for tests/kms_big_fb: Add over 32k HW stride tests (rev2) Patchwork
2019-09-23 17:18 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for tests/kms_big_fb: Add over 32k HW stride tests Patchwork
2019-10-24 9:19 ` [igt-dev] ✗ GitLab.Pipeline: warning for tests/kms_big_fb: Add over 32k HW stride tests (rev3) Patchwork
2019-10-24 9:35 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2019-10-25 10:46 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190927135053.GR1208@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox