* [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Calculate softpin offsets from minimum GTT alignment [not found] <20191031152857.17143-1-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> @ 2019-10-31 16:47 ` Patchwork [not found] ` <20191031152857.17143-5-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> ` (4 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2019-10-31 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Janusz Krzysztofik; +Cc: igt-dev == Series Details == Series: Calculate softpin offsets from minimum GTT alignment URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/68831/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7231 -> IGTPW_3638 ==================================================== Summary ------- **SUCCESS** No regressions found. External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/index.html Known issues ------------ Here are the changes found in IGTPW_3638 that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### #### Issues hit #### * igt@prime_busy@basic-wait-before-default: - fi-icl-u3: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2] ([fdo#107724]) +1 similar issue [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/fi-icl-u3/igt@prime_busy@basic-wait-before-default.html [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/fi-icl-u3/igt@prime_busy@basic-wait-before-default.html #### Possible fixes #### * igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s4-devices: - fi-icl-u3: [DMESG-WARN][3] ([fdo#107724]) -> [PASS][4] +1 similar issue [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s4-devices.html [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s4-devices.html {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE). [fdo#107713]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107713 [fdo#107724]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107724 [fdo#108569]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108569 Participating hosts (52 -> 44) ------------------------------ Missing (8): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-tgl-u2 fi-byt-squawks fi-bsw-cyan fi-ctg-p8600 fi-byt-clapper fi-bdw-samus Build changes ------------- * CI: CI-20190529 -> None * IGT: IGT_5255 -> IGTPW_3638 CI-20190529: 20190529 CI_DRM_7231: 9c304eaf3dae009ccb96d56eca58a81837303fc6 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux IGTPW_3638: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/index.html IGT_5255: b21b6a7aaa0db2159f22ee4427804e5a16fe2261 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/index.html _______________________________________________ igt-dev mailing list igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20191031152857.17143-5-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>]
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH i-g-t v4 4/4] tests/gem_ctx_shared: Align objects using minimum GTT alignment [not found] ` <20191031152857.17143-5-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> @ 2019-11-01 9:42 ` Chris Wilson 2019-11-01 10:11 ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson [not found] ` <1691851.FHYvApHjdp@jkrzyszt-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-11-01 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Janusz Krzysztofik, igt-dev; +Cc: intel-gfx Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-10-31 15:28:57) > exec-shared-gtt-* subtests use hardcoded values for object size and > softpin offset, based on 4kB GTT alignment assumption. That may result > in those subtests failing when run on future backing stores with > possibly larger minimum page sizes. > > Replace hardcoded constants with values calculated from minimum GTT > alignment of actual backing store the test is running on. > > v2: Update helper name, use 'minimum GTT alignment' term across the > change, adjust variable name. > > Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > --- > tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c > index 6d8cbcce..1e9c7f78 100644 > --- a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c > +++ b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c > @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ static void exec_shared_gtt(int i915, unsigned int ring) > uint32_t scratch, *s; > uint32_t batch, cs[16]; > uint64_t offset; > + uint64_t alignment; > int i; > > gem_require_ring(i915, ring); > @@ -203,7 +204,8 @@ static void exec_shared_gtt(int i915, unsigned int ring) > clone = gem_context_clone(i915, 0, I915_CONTEXT_CLONE_VM, 0); > > /* Find a hole big enough for both objects later */ > - scratch = gem_create(i915, 16384); > + alignment = 2 * gem_gtt_min_alignment(i915); > + scratch = gem_create(i915, 2 * alignment); > gem_write(i915, scratch, 0, &bbe, sizeof(bbe)); > obj.handle = scratch; > gem_execbuf(i915, &execbuf); > @@ -246,7 +248,7 @@ static void exec_shared_gtt(int i915, unsigned int ring) > gem_write(i915, batch, 0, cs, sizeof(cs)); > > obj.handle = batch; > - obj.offset += 8192; /* make sure we don't cause an eviction! */ > + obj.offset += alignment; /* make sure we don't cause an eviction! */ It's 'stride' here. It's leaving a guard page in between, just in case page coloring demands it. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [igt-dev] [RFC PATCH i-g-t v4 4/4] tests/gem_ctx_shared: Align objects using minimum GTT alignment 2019-11-01 9:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH i-g-t v4 4/4] tests/gem_ctx_shared: Align objects using " Chris Wilson @ 2019-11-01 10:11 ` Chris Wilson [not found] ` <1691851.FHYvApHjdp@jkrzyszt-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-11-01 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Janusz Krzysztofik, igt-dev; +Cc: intel-gfx Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-11-01 09:42:18) > Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-10-31 15:28:57) > > exec-shared-gtt-* subtests use hardcoded values for object size and > > softpin offset, based on 4kB GTT alignment assumption. That may result > > in those subtests failing when run on future backing stores with > > possibly larger minimum page sizes. > > > > Replace hardcoded constants with values calculated from minimum GTT > > alignment of actual backing store the test is running on. > > > > v2: Update helper name, use 'minimum GTT alignment' term across the > > change, adjust variable name. > > > > Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > --- > > tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c | 6 ++++-- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c > > index 6d8cbcce..1e9c7f78 100644 > > --- a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c > > +++ b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c > > @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ static void exec_shared_gtt(int i915, unsigned int ring) > > uint32_t scratch, *s; > > uint32_t batch, cs[16]; > > uint64_t offset; > > + uint64_t alignment; > > int i; > > > > gem_require_ring(i915, ring); > > @@ -203,7 +204,8 @@ static void exec_shared_gtt(int i915, unsigned int ring) > > clone = gem_context_clone(i915, 0, I915_CONTEXT_CLONE_VM, 0); > > > > /* Find a hole big enough for both objects later */ > > - scratch = gem_create(i915, 16384); > > + alignment = 2 * gem_gtt_min_alignment(i915); > > + scratch = gem_create(i915, 2 * alignment); > > gem_write(i915, scratch, 0, &bbe, sizeof(bbe)); > > obj.handle = scratch; > > gem_execbuf(i915, &execbuf); > > @@ -246,7 +248,7 @@ static void exec_shared_gtt(int i915, unsigned int ring) > > gem_write(i915, batch, 0, cs, sizeof(cs)); > > > > obj.handle = batch; > > - obj.offset += 8192; /* make sure we don't cause an eviction! */ > > + obj.offset += alignment; /* make sure we don't cause an eviction! */ > > It's 'stride' here. It's leaving a guard page in between, just in case > page coloring demands it. Other than that, Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> -Chris _______________________________________________ igt-dev mailing list igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1691851.FHYvApHjdp@jkrzyszt-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>]
* Re: [igt-dev] [RFC PATCH i-g-t v4 4/4] tests/gem_ctx_shared: Align objects using minimum GTT alignment [not found] ` <1691851.FHYvApHjdp@jkrzyszt-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> @ 2019-11-04 9:47 ` Chris Wilson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-11-04 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Janusz Krzysztofik; +Cc: intel-gfx, igt-dev Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-11-04 09:39:32) > Hi Chris, > > On Friday, November 1, 2019 10:42:18 AM CET Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-10-31 15:28:57) > > > exec-shared-gtt-* subtests use hardcoded values for object size and > > > softpin offset, based on 4kB GTT alignment assumption. That may result > > > in those subtests failing when run on future backing stores with > > > possibly larger minimum page sizes. > > > > > > Replace hardcoded constants with values calculated from minimum GTT > > > alignment of actual backing store the test is running on. > > > > > > v2: Update helper name, use 'minimum GTT alignment' term across the > > > change, adjust variable name. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> > > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > > --- > > > tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c | 6 ++++-- > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c > > > index 6d8cbcce..1e9c7f78 100644 > > > --- a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c > > > +++ b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c > > > @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ static void exec_shared_gtt(int i915, unsigned int > ring) > > > uint32_t scratch, *s; > > > uint32_t batch, cs[16]; > > > uint64_t offset; > > > + uint64_t alignment; > > > int i; > > > > > > gem_require_ring(i915, ring); > > > @@ -203,7 +204,8 @@ static void exec_shared_gtt(int i915, unsigned int > ring) > > > clone = gem_context_clone(i915, 0, I915_CONTEXT_CLONE_VM, 0); > > > > > > /* Find a hole big enough for both objects later */ > > > - scratch = gem_create(i915, 16384); > > > + alignment = 2 * gem_gtt_min_alignment(i915); > > alignment = one page for an object + one page for stride > > > > + scratch = gem_create(i915, 2 * alignment); > > space reserved = 2 * (one page for an object + one page for stride) > > > > gem_write(i915, scratch, 0, &bbe, sizeof(bbe)); > > > obj.handle = scratch; > > > gem_execbuf(i915, &execbuf); > > > @@ -246,7 +248,7 @@ static void exec_shared_gtt(int i915, unsigned int > ring) > > > gem_write(i915, batch, 0, cs, sizeof(cs)); > > > > > > obj.handle = batch; > > > - obj.offset += 8192; /* make sure we don't cause an eviction! */ > > > + obj.offset += alignment; /* make sure we don't cause an eviction! > */ > > offset += (one page for an object + one page for stride) > > > It's 'stride' here. It's leaving a guard page in between, just in case > > page coloring demands it. > > Assuming I correctly understood the intentions here but my implementation > is not readable clearly enough, how do you think this should be fixed? How > about a comment '/* one page for an object + one page for stride */' above the > line where the 'alignment' variable is assigned the value of 2 * minimum GTT > alignment? I think "stride = 2 * min_alignment()" concisely describes the intent. -Chris _______________________________________________ igt-dev mailing list igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20191031152857.17143-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>]
* Re: [igt-dev] [RFC PATCH i-g-t v4 1/4] tests/gem_exec_reloc: Don't filter out invalid addresses [not found] ` <20191031152857.17143-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> @ 2019-11-01 10:02 ` Chris Wilson [not found] ` <2117261.1uHUvrbj0G@jkrzyszt-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-11-01 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Janusz Krzysztofik, igt-dev; +Cc: intel-gfx Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-10-31 15:28:54) > Commit a355b2d6eb42 ("igt/gem_exec_reloc: Filter out unavailable > addresses for !ppgtt") introduced filtering of addresses possibly > occupied by other users of shared GTT. Unfortunately, that filtering > doesn't distinguish between actually occupied addresses and otherwise > invalid softpin offsets. As soon as incorrect GTT alignment is assumed > when running on future backends with possibly larger minimum page > sizes, a half of calculated offsets to be tested will be incorrectly > detected as occupied by other users and silently skipped instead of > reported as a problem. That will significantly distort the intended > test pattern. > > Filter out failing addresses only if not reported as invalid. > > v2: Skip unavailable addresses only when not running on full PPGTT. > v3: Replace the not on full PPGTT requirement for skipping with error > code checking. > > Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > --- > tests/i915/gem_exec_reloc.c | 12 +++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_reloc.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_reloc.c > index 5f59fe99..423fed8b 100644 > --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_reloc.c > +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_reloc.c > @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ static void basic_range(int fd, unsigned flags) > uint64_t gtt_size = gem_aperture_size(fd); > const uint32_t bbe = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END; > igt_spin_t *spin = NULL; > - int count, n; > + int count, n, err; > > igt_require(gem_has_softpin(fd)); > > @@ -542,8 +542,11 @@ static void basic_range(int fd, unsigned flags) > gem_write(fd, obj[n].handle, 0, &bbe, sizeof(bbe)); > execbuf.buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj[n]); > execbuf.buffer_count = 1; > - if (__gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf)) > + err = __gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf); > + if (err) { > + igt_assert(err != -EINVAL); I've been thinking about this and I think the right approach is /* Iff using a shared GTT, some of it may be reserved */ igt_assert_eq(err, -ENOSPC); > continue; > + } _______________________________________________ igt-dev mailing list igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <2117261.1uHUvrbj0G@jkrzyszt-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>]
* Re: [igt-dev] [RFC PATCH i-g-t v4 1/4] tests/gem_exec_reloc: Don't filter out invalid addresses [not found] ` <2117261.1uHUvrbj0G@jkrzyszt-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> @ 2019-11-04 9:17 ` Chris Wilson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-11-04 9:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Janusz Krzysztofik; +Cc: intel-gfx, igt-dev Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-11-04 09:13:28) > Hi Chris, > > On Friday, November 1, 2019 11:02:45 AM CET Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-10-31 15:28:54) > > > Commit a355b2d6eb42 ("igt/gem_exec_reloc: Filter out unavailable > > > addresses for !ppgtt") introduced filtering of addresses possibly > > > occupied by other users of shared GTT. Unfortunately, that filtering > > > doesn't distinguish between actually occupied addresses and otherwise > > > invalid softpin offsets. As soon as incorrect GTT alignment is assumed > > > when running on future backends with possibly larger minimum page > > > sizes, a half of calculated offsets to be tested will be incorrectly > > > detected as occupied by other users and silently skipped instead of > > > reported as a problem. That will significantly distort the intended > > > test pattern. > > > > > > Filter out failing addresses only if not reported as invalid. > > > > > > v2: Skip unavailable addresses only when not running on full PPGTT. > > > v3: Replace the not on full PPGTT requirement for skipping with error > > > code checking. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> > > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > > --- > > > tests/i915/gem_exec_reloc.c | 12 +++++++++--- > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_reloc.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_reloc.c > > > index 5f59fe99..423fed8b 100644 > > > --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_reloc.c > > > +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_reloc.c > > > @@ -520,7 +520,7 @@ static void basic_range(int fd, unsigned flags) > > > uint64_t gtt_size = gem_aperture_size(fd); > > > const uint32_t bbe = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END; > > > igt_spin_t *spin = NULL; > > > - int count, n; > > > + int count, n, err; > > > > > > igt_require(gem_has_softpin(fd)); > > > > > > @@ -542,8 +542,11 @@ static void basic_range(int fd, unsigned flags) > > > gem_write(fd, obj[n].handle, 0, &bbe, sizeof(bbe)); > > > execbuf.buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj[n]); > > > execbuf.buffer_count = 1; > > > - if (__gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf)) > > > + err = __gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf); > > > + if (err) { > > > > > + igt_assert(err != -EINVAL); > > > > I've been thinking about this and I think the right approach is > > > > /* Iff using a shared GTT, some of it may be reserved */ > > igt_assert_eq(err, -ENOSPC); > > Thanks for your help, I'll follow your approach. > > Shouldn't we also use the trick with invalid reloc here to save request > emission? Could do. If you move the whole probe out of line so it's not easily confused with the central point of the test, that'll be great. -Chris _______________________________________________ igt-dev mailing list igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20191031152857.17143-3-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>]
* Re: [igt-dev] [RFC PATCH i-g-t v4 2/4] lib: Add minimum GTT alignment helper [not found] ` <20191031152857.17143-3-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> @ 2019-11-01 10:08 ` Chris Wilson [not found] ` <2784945.zMDf8oG64d@jkrzyszt-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-11-01 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Janusz Krzysztofik, igt-dev; +Cc: intel-gfx Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-10-31 15:28:55) > Some tests assume 4kB offset alignment while using softpin. That > assumption may be wrong on future GEM backends with possibly larger > minimum page sizes. As a result, those tests may either fail on > softpin at offsets which are incorrectly aligned, may silently skip > such incorrectly aligned addresses assuming them occupied by other > users if incorrect detection method is used, or may always succeed > when examining invalid use patterns. > > Provide a helper function that detects minimum GTT alignment. Tests > may use it to calculate softpin offsets valid for actually used backing > store. > > v2: Rename the helper, use 'minimum GTT alignment' term across the > change (Chris), > - use error numbers to distinguish between invalid offsets and > addresses occupied by other users, then > - simplify the code (Chris). > > Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> > Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com> > --- > lib/ioctl_wrappers.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > lib/ioctl_wrappers.h | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c b/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c > index 628f8b83..f0ef8b2e 100644 > --- a/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c > +++ b/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ > #include "intel_io.h" > #include "igt_debugfs.h" > #include "igt_sysfs.h" > +#include "igt_x86.h" > #include "config.h" > > #ifdef HAVE_VALGRIND > @@ -1158,6 +1159,51 @@ bool gem_has_softpin(int fd) > return has_softpin; > } > > +/** > + * gem_gtt_min_alignment_order: > + * @fd: open i915 drm file descriptor > + * > + * This function detects the minimum possible alignment of a soft-pinned gem > + * object allocated from a default backing store. It is useful for calculating > + * correctly aligned softpin offsets. > + * Since size order to size conversion (size = 1 << order) is less trivial > + * than the opposite, the function returns the alignment order as more handy. > + * > + * Returns: > + * Size order of the minimum GTT alignment > + */ > +int gem_gtt_min_alignment_order(int fd) But not part of ioctl_wrappers.c! lib/i915/gem_gtt_topology.c? _query.c? _probe.c? > +{ > + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj; > + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb; > + const uint32_t bbe = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END; > + int order; > + > + /* no softpin => 4kB page size */ > + if (!gem_has_softpin(fd)) > + return 12; > + > + memset(&obj, 0, sizeof(obj)); > + memset(&eb, 0, sizeof(eb)); > + > + obj.handle = gem_create(fd, 4096); > + obj.flags = EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED | EXEC_OBJECT_SUPPORTS_48B_ADDRESS; > + eb.buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj); > + eb.buffer_count = 1; > + gem_write(fd, obj.handle, 0, &bbe, sizeof(bbe)); > + > + for (order = 12; order < 64; order++) { > + obj.offset = 1ull << order; > + if (__gem_execbuf(fd, &eb) != -EINVAL) > + break; > + } > + igt_assert(obj.offset < gem_aperture_size(fd)); Hmm, there is one more trick we can apply here: an invalid reloc. memset(&reloc, 0, sizeof(reloc)); obj.relocs_ptr = to_user_pointer(&reloc); obj.relocation_count = 1; We first process the buffers, then we process the relocations. So we will get the -EINVAL for illegal softpin before we get the -ENOENT for invalid reloc handle. That just saves actually emitting a request. -Chris _______________________________________________ igt-dev mailing list igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <2784945.zMDf8oG64d@jkrzyszt-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>]
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH i-g-t v4 2/4] lib: Add minimum GTT alignment helper [not found] ` <2784945.zMDf8oG64d@jkrzyszt-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> @ 2019-11-04 9:28 ` Chris Wilson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-11-04 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Janusz Krzysztofik; +Cc: intel-gfx, igt-dev Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-11-04 09:23:12) > Hi Chris, > > On Friday, November 1, 2019 11:08:45 AM CET Chris Wilson wrote: > > Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-10-31 15:28:55) > > > Some tests assume 4kB offset alignment while using softpin. That > > > assumption may be wrong on future GEM backends with possibly larger > > > minimum page sizes. As a result, those tests may either fail on > > > softpin at offsets which are incorrectly aligned, may silently skip > > > such incorrectly aligned addresses assuming them occupied by other > > > users if incorrect detection method is used, or may always succeed > > > when examining invalid use patterns. > > > > > > Provide a helper function that detects minimum GTT alignment. Tests > > > may use it to calculate softpin offsets valid for actually used backing > > > store. > > > > > > v2: Rename the helper, use 'minimum GTT alignment' term across the > > > change (Chris), > > > - use error numbers to distinguish between invalid offsets and > > > addresses occupied by other users, then > > > - simplify the code (Chris). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> > > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > > Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> > > > Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com> > > > --- > > > lib/ioctl_wrappers.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > lib/ioctl_wrappers.h | 2 ++ > > > 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c b/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c > > > index 628f8b83..f0ef8b2e 100644 > > > --- a/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c > > > +++ b/lib/ioctl_wrappers.c > > > @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ > > > #include "intel_io.h" > > > #include "igt_debugfs.h" > > > #include "igt_sysfs.h" > > > +#include "igt_x86.h" > > > #include "config.h" > > > > > > #ifdef HAVE_VALGRIND > > > @@ -1158,6 +1159,51 @@ bool gem_has_softpin(int fd) > > > return has_softpin; > > > } > > > > > > +/** > > > + * gem_gtt_min_alignment_order: > > > + * @fd: open i915 drm file descriptor > > > + * > > > + * This function detects the minimum possible alignment of a soft-pinned > gem > > > + * object allocated from a default backing store. It is useful for > calculating > > > + * correctly aligned softpin offsets. > > > + * Since size order to size conversion (size = 1 << order) is less > trivial > > > + * than the opposite, the function returns the alignment order as more > handy. > > > + * > > > + * Returns: > > > + * Size order of the minimum GTT alignment > > > + */ > > > +int gem_gtt_min_alignment_order(int fd) > > > > But not part of ioctl_wrappers.c! > > > > lib/i915/gem_gtt_topology.c? _query.c? _probe.c? > > I was thinking about that but couldn't find a good name. I'll use one of your > proposed, thanks. > > > > +{ > > > + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 obj; > > > + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb; > > > + const uint32_t bbe = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END; > > > + int order; > > > + > > > + /* no softpin => 4kB page size */ > > > + if (!gem_has_softpin(fd)) > > > + return 12; > > > + > > > + memset(&obj, 0, sizeof(obj)); > > > + memset(&eb, 0, sizeof(eb)); > > > + > > > + obj.handle = gem_create(fd, 4096); > > > + obj.flags = EXEC_OBJECT_PINNED | EXEC_OBJECT_SUPPORTS_48B_ADDRESS; > > > + eb.buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&obj); > > > + eb.buffer_count = 1; > > > + gem_write(fd, obj.handle, 0, &bbe, sizeof(bbe)); > > > + > > > + for (order = 12; order < 64; order++) { > > > + obj.offset = 1ull << order; > > > + if (__gem_execbuf(fd, &eb) != -EINVAL) > > > + break; > > Should I also follow your advice of checking for -ENOSPC here rather than > !-EINVAL? This time we expect EINVAL for the invalid non-aligned offset provided by the user. -ENOSPC comes later when we fail to evict -- but we will only try that with a valid GTT node. -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20191031152857.17143-4-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>]
* Re: [igt-dev] [RFC PATCH i-g-t v4 3/4] tests/gem_exec_reloc: Calculate offsets from minimum GTT alignment [not found] ` <20191031152857.17143-4-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> @ 2019-11-01 10:11 ` Chris Wilson 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Chris Wilson @ 2019-11-01 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Janusz Krzysztofik, igt-dev; +Cc: intel-gfx Quoting Janusz Krzysztofik (2019-10-31 15:28:56) > The basic-range subtest assumes 4kB GTT alignment while calculating > softpin offsets. On future backends with possibly larger minimum page > sizes the test will fail as a half of calculated offsets to be tested > will be incorrectly aligned. > > Replace hardcoded constants corresponding to the assumed 4kB GTT > alignment with variables initialized with actual minimum GTT alignment > size and order. > > v2: Simplify the code by reversing the size->order conversion, > - drop irrelevant modifications of requested object sizes. > v3: Reword commit message after removal of patch "Don't filter out > addresses on full PPGTT" from the series, > - initialize page size order with an actual minimum returned by a new > helper (inspired by Chris). > v4: Update the helper name, use the term 'minimum GTT alignment' across > the change, adjust variable names, > - refresh the commit message on top of the reintroduced patch that > fixes invalid offsets incorrectly assumed as occupied. > > Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Katarzyna Dec <katarzyna.dec@intel.com> > Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> -Chris _______________________________________________ igt-dev mailing list igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for Calculate softpin offsets from minimum GTT alignment [not found] <20191031152857.17143-1-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> ` (4 preceding siblings ...) [not found] ` <20191031152857.17143-4-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> @ 2019-11-01 19:09 ` Patchwork 5 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Patchwork @ 2019-11-01 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Janusz Krzysztofik; +Cc: igt-dev == Series Details == Series: Calculate softpin offsets from minimum GTT alignment URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/68831/ State : success == Summary == CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_7231_full -> IGTPW_3638_full ==================================================== Summary ------- **SUCCESS** No regressions found. External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/index.html Possible new issues ------------------- Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_3638_full: ### IGT changes ### #### Suppressed #### The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses. They do not affect the overall result. * igt@kms_color@pipe-a-gamma: - {shard-tglb}: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][1] [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-tglb4/igt@kms_color@pipe-a-gamma.html Known issues ------------ Here are the changes found in IGTPW_3638_full that come from known issues: ### IGT changes ### #### Issues hit #### * igt@gem_ctx_exec@basic-invalid-context-vcs1: - shard-iclb: [PASS][2] -> [SKIP][3] ([fdo#112080]) +10 similar issues [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_ctx_exec@basic-invalid-context-vcs1.html [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_ctx_exec@basic-invalid-context-vcs1.html * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@bcs0-s3: - shard-kbl: [PASS][4] -> [DMESG-WARN][5] ([fdo#108566]) +4 similar issues [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@bcs0-s3.html [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@bcs0-s3.html * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-s3: - shard-iclb: [PASS][6] -> [SKIP][7] ([fdo#109276] / [fdo#112080]) [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-s3.html [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-s3.html * igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke: - shard-iclb: [PASS][8] -> [SKIP][9] ([fdo#110854]) [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_balancer@smoke.html * igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-contexts-chain-bsd: - shard-iclb: [PASS][10] -> [SKIP][11] ([fdo#112146]) +3 similar issues [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-contexts-chain-bsd.html [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-contexts-chain-bsd.html * igt@gem_persistent_relocs@forked-interruptible-faulting-reloc-thrashing: - shard-hsw: [PASS][12] -> [FAIL][13] ([fdo#112037]) [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-hsw8/igt@gem_persistent_relocs@forked-interruptible-faulting-reloc-thrashing.html [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-hsw5/igt@gem_persistent_relocs@forked-interruptible-faulting-reloc-thrashing.html * igt@gem_persistent_relocs@forked-interruptible-thrashing: - shard-iclb: [PASS][14] -> [FAIL][15] ([fdo#112037]) [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_persistent_relocs@forked-interruptible-thrashing.html [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-iclb3/igt@gem_persistent_relocs@forked-interruptible-thrashing.html * igt@gem_persistent_relocs@forked-thrashing: - shard-kbl: [PASS][16] -> [FAIL][17] ([fdo#112037]) [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_persistent_relocs@forked-thrashing.html [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_persistent_relocs@forked-thrashing.html * igt@gem_userptr_blits@dmabuf-unsync: - shard-snb: [PASS][18] -> [DMESG-WARN][19] ([fdo#110789] / [fdo#111870]) [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-snb7/igt@gem_userptr_blits@dmabuf-unsync.html [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-snb5/igt@gem_userptr_blits@dmabuf-unsync.html * igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap-cycles: - shard-snb: [PASS][20] -> [DMESG-WARN][21] ([fdo#111870]) +1 similar issue [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-snb1/igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap-cycles.html [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-snb6/igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap-cycles.html * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible: - shard-apl: [PASS][22] -> [DMESG-WARN][23] ([fdo#108566]) +2 similar issues [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-apl4/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-apl1/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible.html * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-mmap-cpu: - shard-iclb: [PASS][24] -> [FAIL][25] ([fdo#103167]) +5 similar issues [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-mmap-cpu.html [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-mmap-cpu.html * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-blt: - shard-glk: [PASS][26] -> [FAIL][27] ([fdo#103167]) [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-glk3/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-blt.html [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-glk7/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-2p-primscrn-pri-indfb-draw-blt.html * igt@kms_psr@psr2_basic: - shard-iclb: [PASS][28] -> [SKIP][29] ([fdo#109441]) +2 similar issues [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_basic.html [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_psr@psr2_basic.html * igt@kms_setmode@basic: - shard-hsw: [PASS][30] -> [FAIL][31] ([fdo#99912]) [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-hsw1/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-hsw1/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html * igt@prime_vgem@fence-wait-bsd2: - shard-iclb: [PASS][32] -> [SKIP][33] ([fdo#109276]) +16 similar issues [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-iclb4/igt@prime_vgem@fence-wait-bsd2.html [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-iclb5/igt@prime_vgem@fence-wait-bsd2.html #### Possible fixes #### * {igt@gem_ctx_persistence@vcs1-queued}: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][34] ([fdo#109276] / [fdo#112080]) -> [PASS][35] +4 similar issues [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@vcs1-queued.html [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@vcs1-queued.html * igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress: - shard-snb: [FAIL][36] ([fdo#109661]) -> [PASS][37] [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-snb1/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-snb2/igt@gem_eio@unwedge-stress.html * igt@gem_exec_parallel@vcs1-fds: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][38] ([fdo#112080]) -> [PASS][39] +9 similar issues [38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_exec_parallel@vcs1-fds.html [39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_parallel@vcs1-fds.html * igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-bsd1: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][40] ([fdo#109276]) -> [PASS][41] +17 similar issues [40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-bsd1.html [41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-bsd1.html * igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-contexts-chain-render: - {shard-tglb}: [INCOMPLETE][42] ([fdo#111677]) -> [PASS][43] [42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-contexts-chain-render.html [43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-tglb8/igt@gem_exec_schedule@preempt-queue-contexts-chain-render.html * igt@gem_exec_schedule@wide-bsd: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][44] ([fdo#112146]) -> [PASS][45] +2 similar issues [44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_schedule@wide-bsd.html [45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_exec_schedule@wide-bsd.html * igt@gem_softpin@noreloc-s3: - shard-apl: [DMESG-WARN][46] ([fdo#108566]) -> [PASS][47] [46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-apl6/igt@gem_softpin@noreloc-s3.html [47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-apl2/igt@gem_softpin@noreloc-s3.html * igt@gem_sync@basic-store-each: - {shard-tglb}: [INCOMPLETE][48] ([fdo#111647] / [fdo#111747]) -> [PASS][49] [48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-tglb4/igt@gem_sync@basic-store-each.html [49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-tglb3/igt@gem_sync@basic-store-each.html * igt@gem_userptr_blits@map-fixed-invalidate-busy: - shard-snb: [DMESG-WARN][50] ([fdo#111870]) -> [PASS][51] +2 similar issues [50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-snb6/igt@gem_userptr_blits@map-fixed-invalidate-busy.html [51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-snb5/igt@gem_userptr_blits@map-fixed-invalidate-busy.html * igt@gem_userptr_blits@map-fixed-invalidate-busy-gup: - shard-apl: [INCOMPLETE][52] ([fdo#103927]) -> [PASS][53] [52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-apl3/igt@gem_userptr_blits@map-fixed-invalidate-busy-gup.html [53]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-apl7/igt@gem_userptr_blits@map-fixed-invalidate-busy-gup.html * igt@gem_userptr_blits@map-fixed-invalidate-overlap-busy-gup: - shard-hsw: [DMESG-WARN][54] ([fdo#110789] / [fdo#111870]) -> [PASS][55] [54]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-hsw5/igt@gem_userptr_blits@map-fixed-invalidate-overlap-busy-gup.html [55]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-hsw4/igt@gem_userptr_blits@map-fixed-invalidate-overlap-busy-gup.html * igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap-after-close: - shard-hsw: [DMESG-WARN][56] ([fdo#111870]) -> [PASS][57] +1 similar issue [56]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-hsw6/igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap-after-close.html [57]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-hsw5/igt@gem_userptr_blits@sync-unmap-after-close.html * igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume: - {shard-tglb}: [INCOMPLETE][58] ([fdo#111832] / [fdo#111850]) -> [PASS][59] +1 similar issue [58]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume.html [59]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-tglb4/igt@gem_workarounds@suspend-resume.html * igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-stress-extra-wait: - shard-glk: [DMESG-WARN][60] ([fdo#105763] / [fdo#106538]) -> [PASS][61] [60]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-glk8/igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-stress-extra-wait.html [61]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-glk1/igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-stress-extra-wait.html * igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists: - shard-glk: [INCOMPLETE][62] ([fdo#103359] / [k.org#198133]) -> [PASS][63] [62]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-glk6/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html [63]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-glk2/igt@i915_selftest@live_execlists.html * {igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_timelines}: - {shard-tglb}: [INCOMPLETE][64] ([fdo#111831]) -> [PASS][65] [64]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-tglb6/igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_timelines.html [65]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-tglb8/igt@i915_selftest@live_gt_timelines.html * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-128x128-random: - shard-hsw: [INCOMPLETE][66] ([fdo#103540]) -> [PASS][67] +1 similar issue [66]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-hsw4/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-128x128-random.html [67]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-hsw8/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-128x128-random.html * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-dpms: - shard-kbl: [FAIL][68] ([fdo#103232]) -> [PASS][69] [68]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-dpms.html [69]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-dpms.html - shard-apl: [FAIL][70] ([fdo#103232]) -> [PASS][71] [70]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-apl4/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-dpms.html [71]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-apl4/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-dpms.html * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-suspend: - shard-kbl: [DMESG-WARN][72] ([fdo#108566]) -> [PASS][73] +6 similar issues [72]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-suspend.html [73]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-suspend.html * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-long-flip-vs-cursor-atomic: - shard-glk: [FAIL][74] ([fdo#104873]) -> [PASS][75] [74]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-glk5/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-long-flip-vs-cursor-atomic.html [75]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-glk1/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@2x-long-flip-vs-cursor-atomic.html * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-render: - shard-iclb: [FAIL][76] ([fdo#103167]) -> [PASS][77] +4 similar issues [76]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-render.html [77]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-iclb3/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-1p-primscrn-cur-indfb-draw-render.html * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-shrfb-plflip-blt: - {shard-tglb}: [FAIL][78] ([fdo#103167]) -> [PASS][79] [78]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-tglb7/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-shrfb-plflip-blt.html [79]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-tglb4/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-primscrn-shrfb-plflip-blt.html * igt@kms_psr2_su@frontbuffer: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][80] ([fdo#109642] / [fdo#111068]) -> [PASS][81] [80]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-iclb4/igt@kms_psr2_su@frontbuffer.html [81]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr2_su@frontbuffer.html * igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_blt: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][82] ([fdo#109441]) -> [PASS][83] +3 similar issues [82]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_blt.html [83]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_cursor_blt.html #### Warnings #### * igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-nonpriv: - shard-iclb: [FAIL][84] ([fdo#111329]) -> [SKIP][85] ([fdo#109276] / [fdo#112080]) [84]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-nonpriv.html [85]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_ctx_isolation@vcs1-nonpriv.html * igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-isolation-bsd2: - shard-iclb: [SKIP][86] ([fdo#109276]) -> [FAIL][87] ([fdo#111330]) +1 similar issue [86]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-isolation-bsd2.html [87]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-isolation-bsd2.html * igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-settings-bsd2: - shard-iclb: [FAIL][88] ([fdo#111330]) -> [SKIP][89] ([fdo#109276]) [88]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-settings-bsd2.html [89]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-iclb7/igt@gem_mocs_settings@mocs-settings-bsd2.html * igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-pri-indfb-multidraw: - shard-iclb: [INCOMPLETE][90] ([fdo#106978] / [fdo#107713]) -> [FAIL][91] ([fdo#103167]) [90]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7231/shard-iclb7/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-pri-indfb-multidraw.html [91]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/shard-iclb6/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-1p-pri-indfb-multidraw.html {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE). [fdo#103167]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103167 [fdo#103232]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103232 [fdo#103359]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103359 [fdo#103540]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103540 [fdo#103927]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103927 [fdo#104873]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104873 [fdo#105763]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105763 [fdo#106538]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106538 [fdo#106978]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106978 [fdo#107713]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107713 [fdo#108566]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108566 [fdo#109276]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109276 [fdo#109441]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109441 [fdo#109642]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109642 [fdo#109661]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109661 [fdo#110789]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110789 [fdo#110854]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110854 [fdo#111068]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111068 [fdo#111329]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111329 [fdo#111330]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111330 [fdo#111646]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111646 [fdo#111647]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111647 [fdo#111671]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111671 [fdo#111672]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111672 [fdo#111677]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111677 [fdo#111747]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111747 [fdo#111830 ]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111830 [fdo#111831]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111831 [fdo#111832]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111832 [fdo#111850]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111850 [fdo#111865]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111865 [fdo#111870]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111870 [fdo#112037]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112037 [fdo#112080]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112080 [fdo#112 == Logs == For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3638/index.html _______________________________________________ igt-dev mailing list igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-11-04 9:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20191031152857.17143-1-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
2019-10-31 16:47 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for Calculate softpin offsets from minimum GTT alignment Patchwork
[not found] ` <20191031152857.17143-5-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
2019-11-01 9:42 ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH i-g-t v4 4/4] tests/gem_ctx_shared: Align objects using " Chris Wilson
2019-11-01 10:11 ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
[not found] ` <1691851.FHYvApHjdp@jkrzyszt-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
2019-11-04 9:47 ` Chris Wilson
[not found] ` <20191031152857.17143-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
2019-11-01 10:02 ` [igt-dev] [RFC PATCH i-g-t v4 1/4] tests/gem_exec_reloc: Don't filter out invalid addresses Chris Wilson
[not found] ` <2117261.1uHUvrbj0G@jkrzyszt-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
2019-11-04 9:17 ` Chris Wilson
[not found] ` <20191031152857.17143-3-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
2019-11-01 10:08 ` [igt-dev] [RFC PATCH i-g-t v4 2/4] lib: Add minimum GTT alignment helper Chris Wilson
[not found] ` <2784945.zMDf8oG64d@jkrzyszt-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
2019-11-04 9:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
[not found] ` <20191031152857.17143-4-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
2019-11-01 10:11 ` [igt-dev] [RFC PATCH i-g-t v4 3/4] tests/gem_exec_reloc: Calculate offsets from minimum GTT alignment Chris Wilson
2019-11-01 19:09 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for Calculate softpin " Patchwork
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox