From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] xe_debugfs: Remove guc_enable check.
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 16:56:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230725205626.346256-2-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230725205626.346256-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
drm-xe-next commit "drm/xe: Invert guc vs execlists parameters and info.")
inverted the param to expose the status of the non-default config.
And commit ("drm/xe/uapi: Remove XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAGS_USE_GUC")
entirely removed the query check.
So, let's simply stop doing this debugfs check here.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
tests/xe/xe_debugfs.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/xe/xe_debugfs.c b/tests/xe/xe_debugfs.c
index 5e16a71a0..5434d4645 100644
--- a/tests/xe/xe_debugfs.c
+++ b/tests/xe/xe_debugfs.c
@@ -104,10 +104,6 @@ test_base(int fd, struct drm_xe_query_config *config)
igt_assert(igt_debugfs_search(fd, "info", reference));
- sprintf(reference, "enable_guc %s", config->info[XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAGS] &
- XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAGS_USE_GUC ? "yes" : "no");
- igt_assert(igt_debugfs_search(fd, "info", reference));
-
sprintf(reference, "tile_count %lld", config->info[XE_QUERY_CONFIG_GT_COUNT]);
igt_assert(igt_debugfs_search(fd, "info", reference));
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-25 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-25 20:56 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] xe: Align uapi after removal of XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAGS_USE_GUC Rodrigo Vivi
2023-07-25 20:56 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-07-26 10:14 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] xe_debugfs: Remove guc_enable check Kamil Konieczny
2023-07-26 14:23 ` [igt-dev] [Intel-xe] " Rodrigo Vivi
2023-07-25 22:03 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [i-g-t,1/2] xe: Align uapi after removal of XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAGS_USE_GUC Patchwork
2023-07-26 8:28 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] " Matthew Auld
2023-07-26 10:06 ` Kamil Konieczny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230725205626.346256-2-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox