From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>,
<igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>, <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Matthew Auld" <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [Intel-xe] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] xe_debugfs: Remove guc_enable check.
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 10:23:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZMEsXUB9GlF/djiq@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230726101431.o53pbvurkpouv2mm@kamilkon-desk1>
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 12:14:31PM +0200, Kamil Konieczny wrote:
> Hi Rodrigo,
>
> On 2023-07-25 at 16:56:25 -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > drm-xe-next commit "drm/xe: Invert guc vs execlists parameters and info.")
> > inverted the param to expose the status of the non-default config.
> >
> > And commit ("drm/xe/uapi: Remove XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAGS_USE_GUC")
> > entirely removed the query check.
> >
> > So, let's simply stop doing this debugfs check here.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>
> I am sorry, please drop my reply for 1/2 because separate 2/2 patch
> break incremental compile, so merge all this into one commit.
>
> With that you can add my r-b tag.
Thank you both for the reviews. I squashed both patches together and pushed.
>
> Regards,
> Kamil
>
> > ---
> > tests/xe/xe_debugfs.c | 4 ----
> > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/xe/xe_debugfs.c b/tests/xe/xe_debugfs.c
> > index 5e16a71a0..5434d4645 100644
> > --- a/tests/xe/xe_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/tests/xe/xe_debugfs.c
> > @@ -104,10 +104,6 @@ test_base(int fd, struct drm_xe_query_config *config)
> >
> > igt_assert(igt_debugfs_search(fd, "info", reference));
> >
> > - sprintf(reference, "enable_guc %s", config->info[XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAGS] &
> > - XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAGS_USE_GUC ? "yes" : "no");
> > - igt_assert(igt_debugfs_search(fd, "info", reference));
> > -
> > sprintf(reference, "tile_count %lld", config->info[XE_QUERY_CONFIG_GT_COUNT]);
> > igt_assert(igt_debugfs_search(fd, "info", reference));
> >
> > --
> > 2.41.0
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-26 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-25 20:56 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] xe: Align uapi after removal of XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAGS_USE_GUC Rodrigo Vivi
2023-07-25 20:56 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] xe_debugfs: Remove guc_enable check Rodrigo Vivi
2023-07-26 10:14 ` Kamil Konieczny
2023-07-26 14:23 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2023-07-25 22:03 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [i-g-t,1/2] xe: Align uapi after removal of XE_QUERY_CONFIG_FLAGS_USE_GUC Patchwork
2023-07-26 8:28 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] " Matthew Auld
2023-07-26 10:06 ` Kamil Konieczny
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZMEsXUB9GlF/djiq@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox