Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/3] tests/xe_waitfence: Removed drm_xe_sync data in exec_queue_reset_wait
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 08:15:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240122024543.456795-3-krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240122024543.456795-1-krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com>

drm_xe_sync flags are declared wrongly and drm_xe_sync data is not used
in this test, hence removing drm_xe_sync which is unused.

Signed-off-by: Bommu Krishnaiah <krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
---
 tests/intel/xe_waitfence.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_waitfence.c b/tests/intel/xe_waitfence.c
index dfdb97fb5..e6354b3ff 100644
--- a/tests/intel/xe_waitfence.c
+++ b/tests/intel/xe_waitfence.c
@@ -221,16 +221,8 @@ exec_queue_reset_wait(int fd)
 		uint32_t data;
 	} *data;
 
-#define USER_FENCE_VALUE        0xdeadbeefdeadbeefull
-	struct drm_xe_sync sync[1] = {
-		{ .flags = DRM_XE_SYNC_TYPE_USER_FENCE | DRM_XE_SYNC_FLAG_SIGNAL,
-			.timeline_value = USER_FENCE_VALUE },
-	};
-
 	struct drm_xe_exec exec = {
 		.num_batch_buffer = 1,
-		.num_syncs = 1,
-		.syncs = to_user_pointer(sync),
 	};
 
 	uint32_t vm = xe_vm_create(fd, 0, 0);
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-22  2:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-22  2:45 [PATCH v4 0/3] tests/xe_waitfence: removed invalid_engine subtest Bommu Krishnaiah
2024-01-22  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] tests/xe_waitfence: remove invalid_engine subtest from xe_waitfence Bommu Krishnaiah
2024-01-22 20:53   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-22  2:45 ` Bommu Krishnaiah [this message]
2024-01-22 20:53   ` [PATCH v4 2/3] tests/xe_waitfence: Removed drm_xe_sync data in exec_queue_reset_wait Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-22  2:45 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] tests/xe_waitfence: Removed duplicate code in waitfence Bommu Krishnaiah
2024-01-22 20:54   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2024-01-22  3:13 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success for tests/xe_waitfence: removed invalid_engine subtest (rev4) Patchwork
2024-01-22  3:33 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240122024543.456795-3-krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com \
    --to=krishnaiah.bommu@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox