From: Jing-Ping Jan <jingpingjan@google.com>
To: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Kamil Konieczny" <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jing-Ping Jan <jingpingjan@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH i-g-t v3] tests/kms: correct index validation logic
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 17:28:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260423092832.595471-1-jingpingjan@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMYCwo5YH+WBOGbDu4uVPgRkQ_N1T3bTZ2fdUSMa7dr+Jvzjqw@mail.gmail.com>
Based on the original implementation and the comment above the function,
it appears the expected behavior is for the plane indices to remain
consistent with those in crtc->planes. Therefore, after swapping the old
and new primary planes, we must update the index in igt_plane_t to
ensure it matches the corresponding index in crtc->planes.
Therefore, we should expect the indices of the old and new primary
planes to remain unchanged after swapping them.
Fixes: ac37e1174cc4 ("lib/kms: Pimp the primary plane swapping")
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jing-Ping Jan <jingpingjan@google.com>
---
v2:
- Add Fixes tag to the commit message.
v3:
- Add Cc tag to the commit message.
lib/igt_kms.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/igt_kms.c b/lib/igt_kms.c
index bec96f267..405a04640 100644
--- a/lib/igt_kms.c
+++ b/lib/igt_kms.c
@@ -2982,8 +2982,8 @@ void igt_display_reset_outputs(igt_display_t *display)
igt_swap(*old_primary, *new_primary);
igt_swap(old_primary->index, new_primary->index);
- igt_assert_neq(old_primary->index, 0);
- igt_assert_eq(new_primary->index, 0);
+ igt_assert_eq(old_primary->index, 0);
+ igt_assert_neq(new_primary->index, 0);
} else {
igt_assert(old_primary == new_primary);
--
2.54.0.rc2.533.g4f5dca5207-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-23 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-20 7:49 [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms: correct index validation logic Jing-Ping Jan
2026-04-20 18:16 ` Kamil Konieczny
2026-04-21 2:07 ` Jing-Ping Jan
2026-04-21 6:13 ` Karthik B S
2026-04-21 6:43 ` [PATCH i-g-t v2] " Jing-Ping Jan
2026-04-21 9:28 ` Karthik B S
2026-04-21 12:02 ` Jani Nikula
2026-04-22 17:05 ` Kamil Konieczny
2026-04-22 17:23 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-04-23 9:21 ` Jing-Ping Jan
2026-04-23 9:28 ` Jing-Ping Jan [this message]
2026-04-23 10:27 ` Kamil Konieczny
2026-04-23 10:40 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-04-21 21:28 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for tests/kms: correct index validation logic (rev2) Patchwork
2026-04-21 22:20 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-04-22 2:36 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
2026-04-22 5:16 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260423092832.595471-1-jingpingjan@google.com \
--to=jingpingjan@google.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox