From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Make sure GPU is quiescent before handling assertions.
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 16:22:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <567151e07ff43dd9fb35814ee46b59738eb8519e.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91d15d29abd351f92e537049fc7d42e981f80a94.camel@intel.com>
On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 16:18 -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 11:00 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 10:52:34AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > > Typically PSR enables in around 136 ms, but on some tests the we
> > > have
> > > to explicitly make sure that the gpu is idle before rendering.
> > >
> > > Otherwise, sometimes we wait for the background flusher to
> > > finish,
> > > which will take at least a second longer, and causes the wait for
> > > PSR to timeout.
> > >
> > > On kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
> > > Starting subtest: psr-2p-scndscrn-shrfb-plflip-blt
> > > psr_active(debugfs_fd, true) took 136ms
> > > psr_active(debugfs_fd, true) took 136ms
> > > psr_active(debugfs_fd, true) took 350ms
> > > psr_active(debugfs_fd, true) took 136ms
> > > psr_active(debugfs_fd, true) took 1598ms
Now that I read this again, we should be checking for PSR exit after a
flip but instead we are waiting for PSR to become active again.
However, this is a different issue that we should fix separately.
> > >
> > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> > > Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108733
> > > Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > > ---
> > > tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c | 3 +++
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > > b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > > index 276ef83ce386..7924bb902a2a 100644
> > > --- a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > > +++ b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > > @@ -1642,6 +1642,9 @@ static void __do_assertions(const struct
> > > test_mode *t, int flags,
> > > {
> > > flags = adjust_assertion_flags(t, flags);
> > >
> > > + /* Make sure any submitted rendering is now idle. */
> > > + gem_quiescent_gpu(drm.fd);
>
> Shouldn't this be called from draw_rect() so that the flip is done
> after rendering is complete?
>
>
>
>
> >
> > Hm, I thought we do this already at open time, but oh well, makes
> > sense.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > > +
> > > igt_debug("checking asserts in line %i\n", line);
> > >
> > > wait_user(2, "Paused before assertions.");
> > > --
> > > 2.19.2
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > igt-dev mailing list
> > > igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-14 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-13 9:52 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Make sure GPU is quiescent before handling assertions Maarten Lankhorst
2018-12-13 10:00 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-12-13 10:05 ` Chris Wilson
2018-12-14 0:18 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-12-14 0:22 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan [this message]
2018-12-14 9:31 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2018-12-13 10:20 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2018-12-13 11:44 ` Patchwork
2018-12-13 11:47 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-12-13 12:39 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-12-13 12:49 ` Chris Wilson
2018-12-13 13:39 ` Maarten Lankhorst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=567151e07ff43dd9fb35814ee46b59738eb8519e.camel@intel.com \
--to=dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox