From: "Manszewski, Christoph" <christoph.manszewski@intel.com>
To: Jan Sokolowski <jan.sokolowski@intel.com>, igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Dominik Grzegorzek <dominik.grzegorzek@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v1] tests/xe_eudebug: use proper address when waiting for fence
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 16:31:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6fe69bd0-a8d7-4b4c-9910-e28840fff381@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240924084937.95759-1-jan.sokolowski@intel.com>
Hi Jan,
On 24.09.2024 10:49, Jan Sokolowski wrote:
> An incorrect address was used as an argument passed to xe_wait_ufence,
> which caused pagefaults as they referenced unmapped addresses.
Yes, for the exec ioctl this is supposed to be a GPU address in the VM.
Nice fix!
>
> Use proper address in xe_wait_ufence.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Sokolowski <jan.sokolowski@intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Dominik Grzegorzek <dominik.grzegorzek@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dominik Grzegorzek <dominik.grzegorzek@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Manszewski <christoph.manszewski@intel.com>
Thanks,
Christoph
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_eudebug.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_eudebug.c b/tests/intel/xe_eudebug.c
> index 40e07ddf6..e28c9ab67 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_eudebug.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_eudebug.c
> @@ -2121,7 +2121,6 @@ static void *vm_bind_clear_thread(void *data)
> fence_data = aligned_alloc(xe_get_default_alignment(fd), sizeof(*fence_data));
> igt_assert(fence_data);
> uf_sync.timeline_value = 1337;
> - uf_sync.addr = to_user_pointer(fence_data);
>
> igt_debug("Run on: %s%u\n", xe_engine_class_string(priv->hwe->engine_class),
> priv->hwe->engine_instance);
> @@ -2157,6 +2156,7 @@ static void *vm_bind_clear_thread(void *data)
>
> delta = (random() % bo_size) & -4;
>
> + uf_sync.addr = to_user_pointer(fence_data);
> /* prepare clean bo */
> clean_bo = xe_bo_create(fd, vm, bo_size, priv->region,
> DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_NEEDS_VISIBLE_VRAM);
> @@ -2197,9 +2197,9 @@ static void *vm_bind_clear_thread(void *data)
> eq_create.extensions = to_user_pointer(&eq_ext);
> exec_queue = xe_eudebug_client_exec_queue_create(priv->c, fd, &eq_create);
>
> - memset(fence_data, 0, sizeof(*fence_data));
> + uf_sync.addr = (cs - map) * 4 + batch_offset;
> xe_exec_sync(fd, exec_queue, batch_offset, &uf_sync, 1);
> - xe_wait_ufence(fd, fence_data, uf_sync.timeline_value, 0,
> + xe_wait_ufence(fd, (uint64_t *)cs, uf_sync.timeline_value, exec_queue,
> XE_EUDEBUG_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT_SEC * NSEC_PER_SEC);
>
> igt_assert_eq(*map, 0);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-24 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-24 8:49 [PATCH i-g-t v1] tests/xe_eudebug: use proper address when waiting for fence Jan Sokolowski
2024-09-24 14:31 ` Manszewski, Christoph [this message]
2024-09-26 1:57 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2024-09-26 1:59 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: " Patchwork
2024-09-26 8:58 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-26 9:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6fe69bd0-a8d7-4b4c-9910-e28840fff381@intel.com \
--to=christoph.manszewski@intel.com \
--cc=dominik.grzegorzek@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jan.sokolowski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox