From: "Sharma, Swati2" <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
To: Mohammed Thasleem <mohammed.thasleem@intel.com>,
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Fix dc9-dpms test on LNL
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 19:02:55 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <722a1c33-d384-4f9c-8652-3d09b8dca950@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231124082712.2384183-1-mohammed.thasleem@intel.com>
Hi Thasleem,
First of all, this patch is not fixing dc9-dpms test.
Rephrase your subject line.
On 24-Nov-23 1:57 PM, Mohammed Thasleem wrote:
> DC5 counter on disp ver >=14 is not expected to get reset in DC9 state.
> Add condition to check runtime_suspended_time value to validate
> DC9 dpms test.
Also, you are not adding any condition, you are just adding platform to
existing condition.
Please fix both subject and commit message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mohammed Thasleem <mohammed.thasleem@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/intel_chipset.h | 1 +
> tests/intel/kms_pm_dc.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/intel_chipset.h b/lib/intel_chipset.h
> index 1edc8e92c..3f2534519 100644
> --- a/lib/intel_chipset.h
> +++ b/lib/intel_chipset.h
> @@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ void intel_check_pch(void);
>
> #define IS_GEN(devid, x) (intel_get_device_info(devid)->graphics_ver == x)
> #define AT_LEAST_GEN(devid, x) (intel_get_device_info(devid)->graphics_ver >= x)
> +#define AT_LEAST_DISPLAY(devid, x) (intel_get_device_info(devid)->display_ver >= x)
>
> #define IS_GEN2(devid) IS_GEN(devid, 2)
> #define IS_GEN3(devid) IS_GEN(devid, 3)
> diff --git a/tests/intel/kms_pm_dc.c b/tests/intel/kms_pm_dc.c
> index a3c7c4018..6990f91a2 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/kms_pm_dc.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/kms_pm_dc.c
> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
> #define KMS_HELPER "/sys/module/drm_kms_helper/parameters/"
> #define PACKAGE_CSTATE_PATH "pmc_core/package_cstate_show"
> #define KMS_POLL_DISABLE 0
> -#define DC9_RESETS_DC_COUNTERS(devid) (!(IS_DG1(devid) || IS_DG2(devid) || IS_METEORLAKE(devid)))
> +#define DC9_RESETS_DC_COUNTERS(devid) (!(IS_DG1(devid) || IS_DG2(devid) || AT_LEAST_DISPLAY(devid, 14)))
>
> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Tests to validate display power DC states.");
>
> @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static bool dc9_wait_entry(data_t *data, int dc_target, int prev_dc, int prev_rp
> * Runtime suspended residency should increment once DC9 is achieved;
> * this condition is valid for all platforms.
> * However, resetting of dc5/dc6 counter to check if display engine was in DC9;
> - * this condition at present can be skipped for dg1, dg2 and MTL platforms.
> + * this condition at present can be skipped for dg1, dg2 and MTL+ platforms.
> */
> return igt_wait((read_runtime_suspended_time(data->drm_fd) > prev_rpm) &&
> (!DC9_RESETS_DC_COUNTERS(data->devid) ||
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-24 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-22 0:22 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Fix dc9-dpms test on LNL Mohammed Thasleem
2023-11-23 18:48 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for " Patchwork
2023-11-24 8:27 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Mohammed Thasleem
2023-11-24 13:32 ` Sharma, Swati2 [this message]
2023-11-29 10:19 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Add LNL platform for dc9-dpms validation Mohammed Thasleem
2023-11-30 13:37 ` Kamil Konieczny
2023-11-24 10:32 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Fix dc9-dpms test on LNL (rev2) Patchwork
2023-11-24 11:43 ` [igt-dev] ✓ CI.xeBAT: " Patchwork
2023-11-25 13:52 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2023-11-29 13:03 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/intel/kms_pm_dc: Fix dc9-dpms test on LNL (rev3) Patchwork
2023-11-29 14:13 ` [igt-dev] ✓ CI.xeBAT: " Patchwork
2023-11-30 13:30 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=722a1c33-d384-4f9c-8652-3d09b8dca950@intel.com \
--to=swati2.sharma@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mohammed.thasleem@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox